Hunting the Deer

To be honest, as a history buff, I lament that there are really only a few online history books that suit my taste. The only one that can make people review the past is "Late Ming Dynasty" (the previous book is really the most fluent one among history netizens). "Guo Qianjiao" (the writing is excellent, decisive in killing, not as long and boring as the Shao and Song Dynasties, and the tasteless feeling of being abandoned) "The Most Romantic of the Three Kingdoms" (restores the urban scenery of the Han Dynasty, although there are Three Kingdoms routine plots, but the rise is smooth No sense of violation) "Qin Officials" (the detailed description of the political system of the Qin Dynasty is detailed but not greasy, and the plot is ups and downs. Although the ending and some plots are rushed, the flaws are not concealed). In addition, the writing of "Three Idiots" is very good, but the protagonists are not competing. The sense of substitution is not strong, Warring States Career is also a good book, but it is not very readable with a lot of philosophical discussions. Ruzi Emperor is also good but I don't want to read it a second time. Currently, the only books I am following are "New Book" and "Ji Lu" written by Ban Chai. Nowadays, the popular novels such as The Prodigal Son of the Ming Dynasty cannot be read from the first chapter. They are either clichéd plots, such as waking up with a maid, or the stupid son of a prince or a prince, or what the hell, I am full of modern vocabulary, and the writing has no ancient charm at all. Another type of novels, such as Shao Song Dynasty, have a look. After a few chapters, I knew it was a good book, but I just couldn't put it down. Maybe it was because the writing was too verbose and too rational to make people feel comfortable. (It's not that I don't want to be rational, I just don't want to be too rational.) It's like a person who is used to eating local delicacies eating a French meal. It's not that it doesn't taste good, but it just doesn't feel comfortable enough.

I don't think Lao Zhao's book is unfinished for no reason. First of all, Ant Thief, because I don't really like that period of history, I only read the first few bits and then gave up. It is difficult to judge the reason for abandonment due to its age. Besides, the Three Kingdoms are the most romantic. From the time I first came across this book, to the time I abandoned it, to the time I read it again, to the time I abandoned it again, I really went through countless choices. You ask me if being the most romantic is good, I think it is good. If you ask me how good it is, I can only answer that it is tasteless and it is a pity to throw it away if it is tasteless. Although the most romantic early stage is slightly "obscene", the writing is quite reasonable and well-founded. The book lacks a bit of the extreme self-pleasure of worshiping and collecting famous generals in the Three Kingdoms literature (there is, but the plot is well arranged), and has more insights from historical novels. For example: in ancient times, people attached themselves to famous people due to local party and geographical rule, or how to invite names. The author has a clearer understanding of history than many people who wrote about the Three Kingdoms. But in the later stage, I enjoyed myself too much and was too indecisive. The last one is this fictional history book. I have basically read this book, and I will subscribe if I need to. But now that the political struggle is still going on, it really makes people speechless. To put it mildly, will the people who are attached to the protagonist agree? Is there always a state of being purged if it fails in the future? It was originally written as a story about a man who conquers his wife, but because he has some feelings for the Queen Mother, he still refuses to make any progress or retreat. I think some readers still use "wife control" as a joke. They only know that desire to conquer? Some readers also said that in the future, Dingxi will be granted to the little emperor and that the little emperor should be treated well. Is it really just about "emotions and morality"? This is a major event to seek to usurp the throne. Changes have never been seen without bloodshed, and this is even when the young emperor has a large number of supporters and elders. Old Zhao's pig's feet are too idealistic. He belongs to a good person, but he is not a politician. There are not so many moral sentiments in politics, and there are not so many right and wrong, good and bad. Of course, I don't mean that I have to write about a cruel and evil person. What I mainly want to say is that your moral sentiments can be fully reflected in your governance. There is no conflict between loving the people and attacking the obstacles that stand in the way of realizing your political ideals. To give a very simple example: Who is more important, one person's life or the lives of a group of people? Is there any conclusion? From a human rights perspective, lives are equivalent, but what I want to see is the realization of the political ideals of the protagonists in this conflict. No one is perfect, but a person with ideals and ambitions is much more difficult than a so-called bad good person. Anyone can be a bad good person, but there are very few ideal people. I have read Lao Zhao's previous explanation that there is external pressure and coups can easily lead to internal instability. It can only be said that this explanation is barely acceptable, but from the perspective of writing, there is no problem in arranging a smooth coup; from a realistic perspective, only the Ju family is a threat now, and the other valves are just dormant. And judging from the previous coups in Dingxi, it is normal for the valve to be loyal in turn. In Lao Zhao's book, problems appear more frequently toward the end. There is a reason why your previous book was unfinished. This feeling is like playing Three Kingdoms or Horse and Blade when I was a child. I enjoyed the early development, but later when I was heading towards victory, I couldn't play anymore and it was no longer interesting. Also, the protagonists in the basic books are all very similar, they just talk about benevolence without distinguishing between benevolence and benevolence. To be honest, Mao was fine enough, but after the founding of the People's Republic of China, he did not show mercy when he deposed Liu and demoted Deng. Political benevolence and brotherly respect and kindness to others are completely different things. Stop writing the same protagonist, highlight the protagonist. Some people say that this book is a group portrait, which I totally disagree with. Go read the book "Steel Gunpowder and the Spellcaster". This book is definitely not a group portrait, but it has more scenes of other characters than this article to highlight the charm of other characters' personalities, but it really has nothing to do with the group portrait. I say all this, not to cause controversy or to scold the author, but I really don't want the books I can read to become less and less attractive. The plot is like boiled water, with no ups and downs.

Damn eunuch again, eunuch deserves death

Eunuch Zhao is well-deserved. In the new book, Chiqi is also a eunuch.

The exam is coming soon, and I feel so idle if I don't want to review. Alas, I wanted to go to bed early. The bottom map is Tan Qixiang's map and the map of prefectures and counties in the book review area. (Probably) The level is limited, so take a look. The general map of each campaign, Jiner's Zhuye Ze, aiding the West Sea, attacking Shuofang, conquering the Western Regions, aiding Shuofang, and attacking Ranxing. Some small ones are hard to find, so I didn't get them. It's too troublesome. Zhu Yeze and aiding Xihai defeated Yao Kingdom Two attacks and rapid rise

After reading it, I searched for other books by the author and found out that it was a eunuch. I regretted reading this book. It was good to read, but it was really uncomfortable to write half of it.

Lao Zhao released his new book "Red Flag" on another platform. You can check the name of the platform on Weibo.

If you don't get good grades, you're a eunuch. It's really nonsense. Everything has to be accumulated. It's really a loss of character. Please subscribe again🐶

In response to Lao Zhao's call, he set up his own business. If you want to be a bit player, just follow Lou. Feng Yu, courtesy name Xiaofeng, was a native of Luoyang in the Northern Wei Dynasty. Learn less from literature, but have talent for writing and calligraphy. There was great chaos in the Houhai Sea. Pu Qin and the Northern Wei Dynasty attacked each other, and people in the Tang Dynasty were devastated. Then he mastered the art of the large crossbow, which has a long range, high accuracy, and bonus damage to armor. It can also be like the crossbow arrows of the later Song Dynasty, which can shoot nails into city walls. Later, he gathered tribesmen and loyal people of the Tang Dynasty to resist Pu Qin (or Northern Wei Dynasty). Later, when Xin You attacked the Northern Wei Dynasty, he sneaked into Luoyang City, contacted the heroes, and made great contributions to Xin You's capture of Luoyang City. After that, he followed Xin You to eliminate the evil and unify China. Because he supported Liu Le and his concubine's eldest son, he suffered setbacks and was demoted. However, he was later re-employed and had some merit. As for his merit, let Lao Zhao use it!

I have read both Ant Thief and The Romance of the Three Kingdoms. I thought it was a masterpiece, but I didn't expect that I would find new books occasionally. It's not very demanding. Don't enter the palace. Come on, come on, come on.