The Fox of France

Author, do you know that in fact no one reads your novels at all? These are all my trumpets. Believe it or not, I just look at them and they all dig 666.

Since 1855, the American tycoon has been pursuing milk bottle books. What I like most is his insight into human nature from history. Human nature after thinking and debating, I think he recognizes it from the bottom of his heart. This also allows me to read his books with confidence. Even sometimes the content can be used as an achievable reference for authenticity. If people are abilities, they are like numerators, and your evaluation of yourself is the denominator. For example, outstanding people love to learn and are able to overcome difficulties one after another. Napoleon faced all difficulties confidently and defeated them as much as possible, and he also loved learning very much. Almost all of his interests were attracted by war. It is precisely because of this that the legend of Napoleon exists. The various abilities of the protagonists in the book who are fifteen or sixteen years old, if placed in other novels, they would be the so-called bosses, the so-called wise men. Their abilities and vision do make me ashamed, but this is also an inevitable trend of middle-class performance. Milk Bottle himself likes history very much. His knowledge is accumulated on history. Because he is familiar with history, it can be seen that he also likes history very much and he has an inescapable fate - he will be connected with history in this life. It is foreseeable that after these years of accumulation, what he can bring will not be a vulgar, same old story that you think is the same over and over again. Perhaps when you are reading a book, your eyes will occasionally light up, and these highlights are the highlights of the explosion of inspiration generated by the milk bottle over the years.

This seems to be the author's first book? Let me give you some suggestions The author should also have discovered that this book has obviously started to rise and fall... In the past, there were many readers, but now there are fewer and fewer readers. There are reasons for both the large number of readers and the small number of readers. Let's talk about the advantages: The previous results are obviously good. The most fascinating thing is the language and translation in daily life. Half a year later, I am still impressed. The author is obviously good at writing about political struggles, such as Fouche, Robles and other influential figures during the French Revolution, as well as various social changes. The writing is also very good. The shortcomings are very serious: 1. There is almost no description of the diplomacy of major powers around the world, or even in Europe, and the exchanges between countries. The reader does not even know which countries France is at war with. They can only guess: Oh, maybe it is those countries in the original history during the Great Revolution? In short, descriptions of countries other than France are completely lost. The reader is in a fog and has no idea which countries France is at war with, nor what the situation is, nor where to start. I have to write about the European HRE, right? I also need to write about Northern Europe, right? Is there one in North Africa too? Italy must have it too, right? Spain and Portugal must also have it, right? The entire perspective makes people feel: there are only France and the United Kingdom, plus half of the North American continent, and the rest is covered in the fog of war, and no map has been opened yet. 2. Although everyone knows that the protagonist of the "Struggle for Hegemony" will change from Joseph to France, but after winning the supreme power of France, the protagonist's change and perspective change are too blunt. The early successes were completely lost. 3. The protagonist writes about international strategies, diplomatic disputes, and alliances. It is indeed poorly written. To be honest, I suggest you learn from someone who wrote about the Holy Roman Empire. I think his writing in this aspect is good. 4. Authors are always full of personal information, and readers actually don't like authors who have too many personal items, especially those who read Western historical texts. Many people have their own ideas. When your personal information conflicts with readers, it will be difficult for readers to continue reading. Moreover, the large length of private goods and "Look, sister" really affect the sense of immersion and overall sense, making readers feel that this book is the author's self-venting rather than writing a good story. At this point, I hope the author will continue to work hard and write better in the next book. So far, this book has actually been unable to save the day, and it is not a big deal to end it hastily... The most read country in Western history is probably Germany. I personally think you can give it a try.

Today's insult to the law

Isn't France the weakest country in Europe? It feels like the only one who is most famous is Napoleon, and no one else can beat him at other times.

There is another book to read

Looking at the title, I thought you were going to write about Richelieu.

Why are there so many bratty brats? I really don't know who is the boss in the EU now?

The Tsar's system is much smarter than the system adopted by the protagonist. Expanding territory in Europe will not only increase support, but also gain military morale. On the surface, it promotes a multi-party system, but in fact it does not allow multiple parties to enter the electoral mechanism and public opinion. Propagate anti-Western, anti-liberalization, and anti-democratic public opinion. One person, one vote is allowed on the business card, but in reality, if the vote result is unfavorable, it will be done in secret. Of course Napoleon won the election without operating behind the scenes. In fact, the royalist party has always been very powerful in the French political system, which shows that the French people admire strongman rule. The French people are not suitable for democracy. A republican system with French characteristics can be implemented. You can definitely learn from the Tsar's system. The tsarist system was hereditary. Kidnapping France to Napoleon will not overthrow the rule of the Bonaparte family.

There are quite a lot of breast-feeding brats in the comment area. I also played breast-feeding memes, but only during World War II. Breast-feeding has passed at any time. For breast-feeding brats who want to breast-feed at any time, I recommend reading history.