The Rise of a Primitive Civilization

The early writing was okay, but the speed of industrialization in the middle and later stages was too exaggerated. Even if all the current academicians of the two academies were packed back to the Stone Age, they would not be able to develop the industrial system to the point where they could manufacture various engineering machinery and firearms in 10 years. To put it another way, if the author is given enough scientific information and allowed to develop in some non-industrial countries in Africa for 20 years, it would be amazing to be able to develop a steam engine.

The reason for producing artillery is because of excess steel production capacity... This reason is very confusing... Your first order of two hundred artillery pieces did consume steel in the short term and create short-term demand The question is what happens next? Your opponents are all primitive people. Until now, you have never seen an enemy armed with steel, and there are almost no bronze weapons The Xin tribe just got some bronze out of nowhere, and then the tribes on the grassland copied it. A batch of crudely made leather armor The rest, let alone bronze, don't even have the concept of metal smelting, they are all unarmored units with ancient spears, stone axes And you have to try to capture them alive every time a war starts. How many times can your artillery fire in a year? Relying on artillery to drive long-term demand for steel is purely whimsical It is now obvious that your population growth cannot keep up with your industrial development. You must either lay off workers to reclaim land, or find new dumping markets for industrial products.

I found that the protagonist is just a complete mess! You are a primitive society! If you don't teach technology or knowledge, why are you teaching ancient poetry? ! ! Can it be eaten or can it be fought? ! You can figure it out after studying for a long time! What's the point? ! !

Some of the knowledge points in it are wrong. I suspect that the author looked up the information on Baidu Encyclopedia that has been arbitrarily modified by others. When I read it, I felt like I was looking at a marketing account.

I haven't read much of this book, and there are too many flaws in its logic... Let's not discuss whether it makes sense or not. There should always be logic in the article. Your technology is the same as playing Civilization 6, post-Stone Age, 10 years of development and the late Steam Age? ? ? It's simply outrageous. These are not big problems, after all, the article is more enjoyable. But are the primitive people here too smart? It's not about how high his IQ is (after all, it depends on the author's IQ...), But his ideas are too advanced, right? This was still the tribal era. Even the slave society had not yet arrived, and the feudal society was only a shadow. As a result, the tribal leaders here already have a sense of sovereignty, currency, monopoly, and territorial waters? Even being inspired by someone else is outrageous. In modern China, in the late feudal society, when the treaty was signed in the late Qing Dynasty, the need for national sovereignty was realized. Was this already clear 5,000 years ago? ! ! These are bearable. The most intolerable thing is that they can't see the majesty of the Han Empire at all. Why do you say that? Those tribal leaders dared to ask for anything and think about anything even though they were at a complete disadvantage in terms of technical and population resources. Your Han tribe still discussed with others in a pleasant manner and made certain concessions, but their tough attitude was not clearly displayed at all. It's quite abstract to say so, let's give an example. Just like when the British colonized the United States and encountered the indigenous Indians, the Han tribes were like the British at that time, and those tribes were like the Indians. You invited them to see your ship and people, and introduced your country. The leader of the Indian tribe was very envious. He asked you for skills, ships, and many things. He planned to rob you after learning. You knew this, but you still exchanged with him in a friendly manner, preparing for "peaceful colonization." Don't you think it's very peace-keeping? What did the UK do back then? Gunboat policy, genocide, slave trade, your Han tribe has all been reduced in dimension and attacked, why can't you be tougher? We don't need to use force, but we just need to negotiate tougher, isn't it good? If he dares to ask for it, you should ask for more; if he dares to think, you dare to do it. You should be more generous with your posture. Foreigners were not so generous when they blocked technology. You squeeze out your technology bit by bit. This is a high-level game that does not affect the people. It is the dignity of a big country to be decisive and tough, right? Do we still expect the lower class people of that era to have a sense of national honor? National pride? His attitude is so soft, it makes him angry.

Let me make a blind guess: The author is from the north, a city dweller, and grows rice in the area where he lives. He knows from various information that rice in the south has two or even three crops, but he definitely doesn't know that in two-crop areas, there is only a few days or even no snow in winter, and in three-crop areas, short-sleeves are worn in winter! The author probably thought that the whole world was like them, spending the winter in ice and snow! Looking at the protagonist's performance, one thing is that he has little military literacy. Even other tribes know how to set up ambushes to catch wild animals to defend against foreign enemies. The protagonist is a special soldier, and there is no defense around the tribe. He was killed many times and only woke up at the entrance of the cave! Is this called special forces? Not as good as ordinary soldiers! The second is that they don't understand production. If they have to describe it in detail, it may be useless to fool city people, not to mention there are so many rural children watching! There are also various common sense questions...

The author is short and weak. If you agree, give it a √

. . . I found that the original Qidian novel either had a single female protagonist or no female protagonist. Shouldn't the original world be like that?

I haven't read too much of this book, just the first 300 chapters! As soon as I saw the cannibal tribe coming to siege the city, I knew I couldn't stand it anymore. First of all, the early stage of a novel written on this subject should be more exciting, the middle stage should be duller, and the later stage should be boring, so I don't have much hope! Many people say that everything in this book is unreasonable. I think so too. Why didn't the cannibals use explosives when they came to besiege the city? Humans don't accept new things that fast. Secondly, how many meters? How many hectares? No one would care about this seriously, right? Those who have never farmed in rural areas probably don't know this. My family has less than five acres of land. It takes two to four days to plant rice, and there is absolutely no such thing as a hundred times. Moreover, it is wild rice, not hybrid rice. The ears of wild rice only have 10 to 25 seeds, or even less. (The author has never seriously planted rice at first glance), but what does it matter? As long as he can justify himself, because the world here is created by him (the author), there is no way to argue. If you don't accept it, just write the same book, it may not be better than him! In summary Comprehensive score: three stars (62 points) The first 100 chapters can be consumed with confidence The above comments are only personal opinions, please don't criticize if you don't like them

I don't understand. Why do we still pursue a small-scale peasant economy when we know that industrialization is the best direction? We already have the pinnacle of manual machinery for textile machinery, and the land is public. The author also said that the textile industry is a labor-intensive industry, and it is more important to expand the scale of the factory rather than inhibit the development of the factory. One of the reasons for the small-scale peasant economy in ancient China was that commerce was underdeveloped and the social environment excluded commerce. Another is the difficulty of transportation. Many villages live in remote and scattered areas, making it difficult to conduct business. Therefore, the small-scale peasant economy has emerged and is self-sufficient. The third is private land However, the current situation of the protagonist is that people are concentrated, and most towns are connected by rivers. Those that are not on the river are not far away. There is rubber and slag for road construction. It does not inhibit business and even encourages commercial development. This gives sufficient soil for industrial development I can be self-sufficient. Why buy from others? This is a blow to commercial development because demand has decreased. Moreover, large-scale factories, whether in terms of cost, sales, or technology research and development, far exceed individual production under the small farmer economy. If production capacity is insufficient, recruit people, reform technology, and commerce to complete the flow of goods and create commercial tax revenue. After the manufacturing industry reaches a large scale, commercial tax will be much higher than agricultural tax. The most important point is that the Han tribe implements public ownership of land. How to use a piece of land, whether for farming or building a factory, is completely decided by the state. This is the same as the difference between Japan and China now. China has urban planning, and it is a relatively popular profession and department. There is no such industry as urban planning in Japan, let alone a department. Because land in Japan is still privately owned, the government has no right to intervene in the use of land, let alone plan the entire city In China, land is publicly owned, and the use of land is decided by the government, so there is urban planning. Since the protagonist implements public ownership of land, he can completely use urban planning to achieve integration and characteristics. For example, Textile City, Coal City, Metallurgical City, Grain City Specialized cities are conducive to large-scale production activities, transportation and commerce, and at the same time effectively avoid urban independence, because each city cannot be self-sufficient and can only rely on the state. Author, you said that the small-scale peasant economy is not a regression. Isn't it a regression to suppress the development of workshops? Or should we say stay put? The author has completely failed to understand the essence of public ownership of land, which is to stand at the national level and from a strategic perspective to conduct centralized, characteristic, and large-scale planned development I am very disappointed with this.