The Grand Academy of Natural Sciences

I fully subscribed and subscribed automatically. I am currently reading "The Wizard's Journey" for the third time. Although the book "The Wizard's Journey" has immature writing, plot structure, character creation, etc., The colorful and endless world depicted by Egret is enough to attract my curiosity, and the wizard's ability system is also self-contained. I hope the new book will be better written. Please order it in full first, and all your monthly recommendation votes will be given to you. Eat it after you fatten it up. I hope it will be a plate of delicacies similar to the spore fish cooked by Mrs. Green 😍😍

"Grand Academy of Natural Sciences" has been published for a while, and I decided to write in a slow-burning way with a map, so it was released relatively late. The narrative is similar to Star Wars, and it also has respect for the plunder and destruction of the dark forest in the starry sky of the "Three-Body" universe. The first part of the story tells the story of the protagonist who, on the basis of understanding the rules of the map, launches the genius flow mode. It is basically the model of the academy's invincible flow to conquer the wild natives. If you have any opinions, feel free to put them forward. 😊

If I hadn't seen the updated chapter in "The Wizard's Journey" today, I wouldn't have known that the new book had been released, so what kind of silence would it be 🔨 Welcome back, I hope this book will be wonderful. Recommendation votes are given, come on!

I told you to publish the book earlier. I have been waiting for so long, almost a year, and the rest are all die-hard fans. I will definitely support it.

I'm here to read a cool article, not a mediocre piece of trash. If I'm not to read a cool article, I might as well read myself. At least I'm quite real.

Congratulations on putting it on the shelves, rewards and encouragement. Little egret, come on, come on 😊

This book was somewhat interesting at the beginning, but starting from the place where the principality was destroyed completely destroyed the logic, rationality, and even the context of the entire book. There are too many unreasonable things in the whole book. The astral essence in the beginning has never been mentioned since the place where the principality was destroyed. Bai Ling and Sha Tuo Luo disappeared inexplicably. It was clearly written that the superhumans were chasing Lei Luo for the astral essence, but when they came down, they threw Lei Luo aside and hit the Middle-earth Empire and the underground. The author obviously doesn't know much about science and is not writing about the Academy of Sciences. I wrote a bunch of pseudo-scientific logic that makes people uncomfortable. Lei Luo is like upgrading in online games. He gets a few skills at the beginning, and then it is character upgrade + skill upgrade. Several methods in the later stage are obtained from external forces. I don't know what he is researching all day long. The Wizard's Journey has written about so many interesting civilizations. In this book, the gray worm herding beans is a bit interesting. All other civilizations basically build spaceships. Even viruses build spaceships, which is so outrageous. Can viruses make metallurgy? Moreover, they are all development technologies, and there is no sense of advancement in academia at all. While emphasizing how much pressure there is in academia, how much time it takes to destroy it, progress must be made at the cost of destroying 99% of the population of the principality. While spending another year teaching in Middle-earth, I also traveled with Laura. The author's values ​​also have serious problems. Compared to Lei Luo, Hitler was nothing, he only killed millions of Jews. This is already a war criminal against humanity. When implementing his bullshit plan, there was no discussion, no retreat, and no plan for what to do if something goes wrong. It was just a slap on the head. If it succeeded, it was definitely cheating by the author. Don't you see, the recruiter sent his father to him with the sound of a cannon. The consequences of attacking a big country are highly uncontrollable, let alone attracting the attention of a hostile higher civilization. Luring a paranormal person into the body is simply a pure act of harming others and yourself. Lei Luo couldn't defeat the superhumans until the end of the fight. It's really outrageous that the superhumans were decimated when the academic world was only a level 2 civilization. There was no way to do anything about it. It was said that no matter the cost, it turned out that none of Lei Luo's relatives and friends were in trouble. Has the author ever thought that destroying 99% of people and dying may include these relatives and friends? How much hatred will be aroused, even if those whose family members died can't offend Lei Luo, they can still anger his relatives and friends and cause huge casualties. Isn't it a bit ridiculous to talk about progress at all costs when even the authors of several books are reluctant to share it with friends and relatives? Scientists must first be individuals, and progress must be based on the well-being of mankind. The author admires Darwin's theory of evolution very much, but has big problems in understanding it. The logic of evolution is to adapt to the environment and survive, not that the creatures that appear in more extreme environments will become stronger. There is a problem with the translation of the word "evolution". In fact, it should be closer to evolution. In fact, organisms that survive extreme environments can only survive in the environment they are adapted to, and cannot survive at all in normal environments. On the contrary, the biological populations that have adapted to more diverse environments have the largest number. In addition, evolution is a long process, which usually takes at least three generations. It is more reasonable for adaptive evolution to occur in ten generations. Huge changes in the environment in the short term will only cause biological extinction. It can be seen between the lines that the author is quite confused and even painful. What I want to say is that thinking without learning is dangerous. This situation arises precisely because the author understands too little about the world, institutions, science, and civilization. It is recommended that the author read more and collect more stories to enrich his knowledge and experience so that he can write more exciting stories😊

I forced myself to turn to chapter 17 and couldn't stand it anymore. The setting was good at first, but it turned out that I didn't intend to write seriously about science at all. It was just a guise of science, and it couldn't be called fantasy at all. It was just a ten-year-old fantasy novel, with magic and vindictiveness thrown in all at once. The names of the characters and the details in all aspects did not feel like the Western world at all. There was a chapter in which a lot of people were fighting to respect the teacher. I don't care whether the emphasis on respecting the teacher is in the front or the back. Doesn't the author feel uncomfortable putting these four words here? You can't just write about pursuing the truth or something like that. The female characters are immediately embarrassed when they appear, and they don't know what they are doing. I would like to ask these authors, have they never talked to women in real life? Have you ever seen such a woman? If you have seen such a woman, and you write like this, then I have nothing to say. There are more than just these questions. For example, God created a rock that he could not lift. Then the protagonist heard that it was true, so he doubted God. Who would still believe in God if it is so simple? Theologians have already discussed it, because your question is against human logic. People must comply with their own logic. As long as they are almighty within the scope of human logic. For humans, it means omnipotence. There is no discussion about whether the almighty God can create a stone that he cannot lift. As for things that humans cannot understand beyond the scope of human logic, it is useless to tell you. If you must ask for an answer, theologians will answer you, yes. God can create a stone that he can both lift and cannot lift. Does this sentence still make sense to humans? Just like you can't understand what the five- and six-dimensional space is like, humans can no longer understand God's behavior. This problem itself has become a word game for people, just for their own entertainment. Of course I am not here to defend God, because I do not believe in Christ. What I want to express is that the protagonist, as a person who has studied theology since childhood and is well versed in it, is shaken by such a question. Where has his theology gone? These details simply show that the author did not carve or polish the article at all, and just dealt with it casually. Therefore, he gave a Western fantasy article a Chinese fantasy flavor. This is also the reason why he wrote a good article without spending any effort at all. Of course, the lack of details I listed above did not make me unable to watch it at all, but the appearance of the female characters, the interactions and conversations between the characters really insulted my IQ, and I really couldn't watch it anymore.

Is there a connection between the new book and The Witcher's Journey?

I have read three Egret books, but each one is not as good as the other. I thought that The Wizard was the beginning of Egret and would get better and better as time went by. However, I didn't expect that The Wizard was the peak of Egret. The author I liked very much at first has become like this now