Justice Is Never Absent

Overall, I don't like the recent plot. Maybe I thought the protagonist was more like a rigid hero at first, who abides by the rules but has his own principles. For example, he killed the Tyrannosaurus rex who betrayed the navy but violated the rules and killed the king. But recently, I feel that the protagonist is more like a butcher on the execution ground. He even scolds you a few times before killing, so I feel like giving up the article after reading these recent chapters. How should I put it, I always feel that the author did not describe the protagonist's sense of justice well in these chapters, giving me the feeling that the protagonist is doing bad things for his own pleasure and for himself. For example, the word "yin and yang" should be used for a person who thinks that he is enforcing justice? Also, I think the protagonist tends to be the kind of person who can take action without being aggressive. In recent chapters, the protagonist has obviously developed a tendency to be like Kizaru, taking advantage of you before fighting. If you insist on saying that killing your whole family will affect your mentality, I can only laugh. Why haven't you thought that if someone else's mentality breaks down and their combat power explodes for you, then you won't be able to only play GG.

It's really enlightening. What about a thief and a righteous person? Which thief is just except the Grand Thief? Burning, killing, humiliating and looting were all forced, right? For example, I am also poor, so I have to become a pirate in order to survive. I am lazy and don't want to work, so I have to sacrifice you. Anyway, you are not the only one who dies, and your family is not the one who is ruined, so what does it matter?

I think Red Dog is okay. For example, pirates are ordinary bandits and robbers, the navy is equivalent to the government, and the revolutionary army is actually an anti-government organization. To put it nicely, for example, ISIS can also be called the revolutionary army. Also, digging up history that is prohibited by the government is a crime in itself and can easily destabilize society. Just like if you are now digging into the dark history of g and making it a whole-school project of a university, why don't you take action? Although Red Dog is extreme and has harmed many good people, such a government will also make people feel at ease. Just like the US war in Iraq and Syria, how many good people have been harmed? But only in this way will Americans have a very high sense of identity and security. If you can only condemn everything, investigate clearly before taking action, and leave it alone if it is unclear, will the people have a sense of security?

Four recommendation votes, can they be refined?

You actually use our social point of view to talk about things in One Piece, and then there is no absolute good and absolute evil in people. Can I say that if you eat meat (no matter what kind of meat it is) and if you hurt animals, you are evil? Can't, right? So don't take things too seriously, and One Piece is an anime, don't take it too seriously, just watch it 🙂

Can monthly rewards be increased?

To be honest, I thought this novel was very good at first, but as I wrote it, I felt more and more that the protagonist had become indifferent to right from wrong. In his heart, anyone who was at odds with the navy was evil. It was too extreme. If the plot continues to be like this in the future, I would like to express my regret and I will abandon the book.

Justice may be late, but it will never be absent. Bah, justice delayed is not justice.

With all due respect, the Navy is the dog of the Celestial Dragons, why bother with the title of One Piece fan?

It's sad that the results are so poor. The author doesn't understand the world of pirates at all. It gets twisted just looking at it