My Emperor Father Took My Place in the Succession War

I'm really angry... Can readers who came to speak for that article answer me, "The concubine's mention of other precocious princes caused the emperor to think of the protagonist's slow development and feel unhappy", "The emperor summoned the imperial doctor to ask why the protagonist could not speak at the age of one", "The emperor privately taught the protagonist to call daddy and the protagonist responded with "Gruck"". How likely is it that these three plots will collide at the same time in just two or three chapters? Could it be that just slightly changing the order, replacing calling daddy with calling father, and replacing "cluck" with "hee hee", is it considered original?

I said to someone in the comment area, when did this article say that the welfare extra chapter was updated casually, and the so-called perfect ending, and that the author stopped writing it because he didn't want to write the rights protection extra chapter. It's really funny. Why is the author being scolded? It's because she promised to update the extra chapter at the beginning, but she kept delaying it. What's more, I asked for leave at the beginning, but then I just pretended to be dead and never came back. What made the readers really angry was that I couldn't do what I promised. When I came back, I started to say that I should revise the article and write a side story. I didn't mention protecting my rights at all. In the end, I wrote a forum article, and I said that I couldn't write the side page. After finishing the review, I quit the website, saying It is clear that you are coming back to do copywriting, so don't say that you have to revise and write extras, and you can't do what you promised. Why shouldn't readers be angry? What is she right about readers? Anyone who doesn't know the inside story, please see clearly, what is the author's problem: 1. When writing an article, you can't use too much in your words. The result is that the second half is just like writing an outline, jumping to adulthood and ascending to the throne all at once, and all the subsequent plots are covered in one stroke. This is the so-called "perfect ending". 2. When I updated the article, I promised to write an extra chapter. I asked for leave at the beginning, but then I never updated or responded to readers. 3. When I came back, I said I wanted to revise the article and write a side story, but I didn't even mention that I wanted to defend my rights. As a result, after the incident came out, I just wrote a chapter saying that I would quit the Internet after I finished defending my rights. Then what are you doing back here? You have always failed to deliver and made false promises. Then why shouldn't you be angry as a reader? All the above content comes from the author's words, all actions and the content she posted in the comment area when following the update.

There is no conflict between supporting the author's rights protection and allowing the author to complete the if extra. . Support authors' rights protection. . . I don't care that the author only appeared because of rights protection, but at least I'll finish writing this if now that it has appeared. It can be regarded as having a beginning and an end. What's the point of conscience if I don't finish it? Who am I who chases after and is doomed even more? Just count me as having time [helpless]

Mi A, meow meow, stop pretending. If you can say something like "Extras are meant to be a bonus, so what if they don't update", you can't be a reader. Put down the bowl here and start cursing, and refund all the money spent by readers. You are e-xin enough, and you have the ability to open a big account and say in the comment area, what is your ability like a laoshu in the gutter? After enjoying the benefits of this kind of article before Jinjiang, start putting down the bowl and scolding the mother.

Wow, I came back after two months and saw that it was actually so lively. Readers begged for extras and all the results were gone. As soon as I got cxed, my blood immediately filled with excitement. Although I very much support the author's rights protection, but you, the author, are also evil, and evil people will have their own troubles.

Oh my gosh, I don't know what's going on, I feel like I'm quite gentle in my words, haha, and I'm not forcing the author. After all, I can't write in the author's handwriting. Let me start by saying that I wasn't very angry before the author came out. That was the day I saw the author saying that he was going to quit the network after safeguarding his rights. Uh-huh, I was really convinced when I saw the withdrawal. In fact, I feel like most people The readers are really tolerant and didn't say anything to the author. We are the readers who read the article. The author wrote it and we bought it. It's an equal relationship. First of all, I have forgotten about this book for a long time. It seems that it is normal for there to be glitches when I am catching up on updates. It is the law of time. The author said that the extra chapter will make up for everyone, so wait until the extra chapter is about the cubs. The issue is only one chapter. The author may have adjusted the status and updated the welfare episode Modern IF. After updating for two chapters, I didn't feel it. I forgot that it disappeared. But there will be a period of time to update the sick and weak. OK, we accept it. We are afraid that the author's welfare episode will not be motivated and we will also ask the author to charge. The author initially said that it would be updated every three days. I forgot about the update once a week. We all understand the author, right? In fact, I think if the author can't do it, don't make a promise. It's a very simple thing. If you know you can't do it, don't say it. I'm also disgusted with this. I believe the author said at the time that the welfare series would be updated by chance, but no one said anything about the author once a year, so can you blame the readers [rolling eyes]

Some people have been expanding the scope and expanding the contradiction to make the author complete the extra story ≠ do not support the author's rights protection ≠ do not understand the author, 1 did not say that the book is not good-looking, 2 did not say that the author should not protect rights 3. I didn't say that plagiarism is right. What I have always said is that it is very tasteless for the author to dig holes for readers and not fill them in. I also don't understand the author's behavior of quitting the network and pretending to be dead. I understand that the author can't continue writing, but why can't he come out to reply to readers earlier? Why should he do it all? And the third Gege reader disappeared in the end. He came out to defend his rights and did not insist on finishing these extra chapters and actually said he would quit the network. I understand that the author was very angry and was not in the mood to write because he was plagiarized. I also understand that the author may have no inspiration now, but the author actually said he wanted to quit the network haha

I really can't help but say something fair. Readers who have been promised benefits for so long are just trying to find justice for themselves. It's quite funny that some people will confuse right and wrong and say that they don't support the author's rights protection. You can see which of the welfare chapters are not full subscriptions. If you look down on the reader's small money, let the author come out to refund the money or take responsibility. We say that we are inconsiderate and intolerant of authors. Do you really feel the disappointment every time you click on it and see that it is not updated? If you can't write it down, just admit it honestly, so that both parties can have some dignity. You are so tolerant and considerate. I can only wish you the best of luck in meeting such authors when you read articles in the future. After all, you who are so tolerant and considerate must understand the author's difficulties [kiss] Finally, I support the author's rights protection to prevent anyone from saying that my position is unclear and labeling me [laughing]

It seems that the author is still online. Have you read the comment section of this book during this time? Everyone is waiting for you to give an explanation [laughing] Only when someone is needed to charge into the battle will I realize that it is really 666 to squeeze in some updates.

Plagiarism is definitely wrong, but the atmosphere in this comment area is really different from the comment areas of other plagiarized novels, hahaha. Because plagiarism hurts the author himself, but the author's bad work always hurts the readers, so it can be seen that the attitude of some people in the comment area has nothing to do with them (I am also a [clown]. Because I have an average opinion of the author of this article, and this article is not a super favorite. To put it bluntly, people who watch the fun know that plagiarism is wrong, but have no feelings for the article that was plagiarized.) However, it is not easy to defend rights against plagiarism. I can only say, author, work hard.