The Champion's Creed

After reading about two hundred chapters, here are my thoughts: Honestly, it's a decent basketball novel for beginners. It's mindless; anyone who hasn't watched 90s basketball can read it without thinking. This is the first time I've read a book praising the Iceman. If the author sees this post, I recommend reading Silent Master's "You Are a Pearl, Do Not Let It Be Dusted.

Let's try something different this time, stop with the same old forced self-deprecation. We, your little brothers, still need to support you, so just write normally and stop trying to be cool.

This is a very idiotic book. It's less and less worth subscribing to as you go on. The protagonist has won so many championships, but has he ever been respected? Has the author never been respected and can't even imagine this kind of feeling?

This book imitates Pride in many ways, but its writing is far inferior. Dafei's character is gradually revealed through numerous shifts in perspective, from dominating high school to responding to other rookies in the draft. The author doesn't forget to develop the personalities of other supporting characters; even West's brief appearances are memorable. In contrast, the supporting characters in this book are like characters from the 2K series—soulless and devoid of depth.

I wasn't too keen on the new chapter about the Bulls, for several reasons: 1. The Bulls aren't short of championships. Danny Williams just established a dynasty. Even if the protagonist leads the team to a championship, what difference does it make? Fans still miss Williams; consider the relationship between Kobe and Eddie in Los Angeles.

Is this whole Shaq saga going to drag on forever? The Eastern Conference Finals disaster, the offseason blunder, and then the management taking the blame and getting rid of him—that story should be over, right? Do you have to go back and start all over again? Is your portrayal of Shaq believable?

The writing style is like a data report. The protagonist starts at a top level, but every match is basically just the protagonist throwing and throwing, followed by endless praise of the protagonist, repeating the same cycle over and over. A match can be finished in two chapters, with absolutely no exciting moments.

Can you please stop adding these baseless accusations? Nowadays, fandoms are incredibly toxic, and even NBA fans have their own fandoms. James: Groin, you can criticize it even if you're not married. Curry: I didn't play well, so I wore cropped pants, 7/8 pants, and 4/8 pants. Kobe: A strange, inexplicable prison, iced tea.

Let's stop with the face-slapping plot twists. 🙂🙂

Why are so many people still thinking that beating the protagonist will allow them to replace him? One championship surpassing seven? You yourself said that three consecutive championships in modern basketball are extremely difficult, so why do so many players think they can surpass the protagonist? And it's two teams with seven championships? You're sacrificing all plausibility for the sake of the protagonist's defeat, which makes it awkward to watch.