The Champion's Creed

As title

I have read about 200 chapters, and here are my thoughts: To be honest, Xiaobai's basketball articles are quite good, and they are mindless. Those who have never watched the games in the 1990s can read them without thinking. This is the first time I have read a book about Iceman. If the author sees this post, he recommends reading "You are a pearl, don't be in the dust" by Silent Boss. Time travel, we readers allow you to cheat and beat up many stars, but how can you have the courage to dream of reaching the top with your iceman talent, the 96 Bulls? All the basketball system time-travel articles, there is no one that does not have the combination of various talents to defeat Jordan. Author, have you really watched the games in the 1990s? Why is Jordan recognized as the god of basketball? A childish O'Neal, the Magic Shark has diarrhea at critical moments, the mentality explodes, and a new player who just entered the league A rookie with iceman talent first started to fight Jordan in various ways, and then he had big dreams and abused the 96 Bulls. I don't even bother to talk about 95 Jordan. According to your setting, 95 is the peak. You can make a rookie with peak iceman talent who just entered the league and a young shark win 4:0 in the playoffs. You really dare to write that. I came here to write this after I finished writing 97. It is also to be fair. Some NCs say that they came here to criticize before reading a few chapters. It is the most ridiculous basketball article I have ever read. If you want to write about someone who has his own talent and competes with Jordan for hegemony, I sincerely recommend the author to read the book of Silent Boss. If you want to write about Black James, I suggest you read Nerve Knife Summary: No-brainer white article, pure James Black, Joe Black, and Comey can come in and read it. Anyone who has watched a season of games in the 1990s, don't come, it's a waste of time.

Let's have a different life this time, don't be slapped in the face by the same old routine. We little brothers still have to support you, so just write normally and don't forcefully show off.

It's a very retarded book. The more it goes on, the less worth subscribing to it. It has won so many championships. Has the protagonist ever been respected? Is it because the author has never been respected and cannot imagine this feeling?

This book imitates Pride everywhere, but the writing style is really far behind. The author gradually presents the character of Da Fei to the readers through a large number of perspective switches. From breaking out in high school to responding to other rookies in the draft, the author has not forgotten to shape the characters of other supporting characters. Even West's few strokes are impressive. The supporting characters in this book are all 2K-style characters, without souls and flesh and blood.

I didn't like the Bulls very much when I saw the new chapter. There are several reasons: 1. The Bulls are not short of champions. Danzi only established a dynasty. What can the protagonist do even if he leads the team to win the championship? Fans still miss Danzi, so they can refer to Kobe Bryant and Ah Tan in Los Angeles. Judging from the previous foreshadowing, Danzi has a very bad feeling for the protagonist. When Danzi comes back, the team will definitely be in dire straits. A Chicago palace drama? 2. There are too many bosses in the team, and there are many conflicts. Pippen has made it clear that he is going to cause trouble, and the next step will be a wave of pretending to slap you in the face, and then make it clear: I am here to conquer you. No need, really, if Pi Lao Er is like Green, let me say: Before you came, we were the champions! Is it disgusting? 3. Even if you later become successful, have conflicts with Braised Eggs, trade to team up with Sharks, and come back to slap you in the face, in the eyes of some people, you will still be a loser who was squeezed out. I hope the author can consider the direction of the plot in the future. I liked the previous books quite a lot, so I will wait and see this one for now.

There's no end to O'Neal's scandal, right? After a big offseason in the Eastern Conference Finals, the management took the blame and asked him to get out. This episode is over. He has to go back and start again, right? Will the O'Neal you created stand? In reality, O'Neal is the kind of person who can hold back his dissatisfaction for more than ten games before venting it? The O'Neal you wrote is gloomy, childish, and pure and precious. If you don't know, you think you are writing about Bynum. If you don't know how to write, can you copy how the famous Shark Black next door shaped O'Neal? If not, you can just copy your own old book and see how O'Neal is written. Don't end up not being able to understand your own writing, then you are really learning to walk in Handan.

It is written in the form of a data sheet. The protagonist is at the top level at the beginning, but every game is basically the protagonist throwing shots, and then all kinds of bragging about the protagonist. The cycle is repeated, and a game can be ended in two chapters. There is nothing exciting at all. On the contrary, the abstract length of the teammates is more than the content of the game. It gives me the feeling that the author is not here to tell stories, but just to complain. Sure enough, there is a reason why the performance in sports categories is generally poor.

No more slap-in-the-face dramas🙂🙂

Can you please not add inexplicable black material? Today's fans are serious about thieves, and NBA fans also have their own XXN. James: The groin can be black with or without a marriage certificate. Curry: Poor performance, 9-point pants, 7-point pants, 4-point pants. Kobe Bryant: Inexplicably strong, iced black tea. Why do current basketball articles always write about this kind of thing? This kind of content has no impact on the process of the novel. It just contains private information. I didn't write much in the previous books and the results were pretty good, right?

Why do so many people think that winning the protagonist will replace him? One crown exceeds seven crowns? You have said it yourself, it is very difficult to win three consecutive championships in modern basketball. Why do so many players think they can surpass the protagonist? And seven championships for two teams? You're slapping the protagonist in the face, completely sacrificing rationality, which makes people uncomfortable.

The reason why the literary youth next door is ranked first is because he has always been a literary youth. At first, his grades were not good, and he was still commenting on Yin Yang Reader. But he insists on being a literary youth. I have blocked him and will not read his books again. Is it because I have read his "Descendants of the Bull" in its entirety and am still following it. , I don't know what the next five or six books were like, and I don't know what the current one is like, but this Roger book may not be better than the ones I've read a few years ago, and I'll let you know in advance next time I change tracks, I won't read it if I know it's Wenqingliu.

If you write that your opponent is strong, then you should write about the problems that arise in your opponent every time, from the problems between the Magic Sharks and the management, the Sharks being affected by public opinion, the internal strife between the Sharks and the protagonist, to how many of the main players in the Hawks were injured, and the boss was replaced by a stupid boss. The most unreasonable one is the boss. Which boss would be stupid enough to have money and not make a profit? The person who wants to get rid of the number one player in the league just writes that the owner's interests come first. Even if the team's salary expenditure is too much, it will always make more than if it loses the protagonist. You said that the new owner has a strong desire for control and racial discrimination is easy to explain, but you also wrote that he only invests in the NBA to make money, so his behavior is that he thinks there is too much money and wants to lose it. Deliberately creating difficulties to win the championship is too obvious, seems very brainless, and makes people uncomfortable. There are a lot of descriptions in the whole article that look down on the protagonist and are not optimistic about the protagonist. He is almost the first person in history, and he is still at his peak. . . .

I can't believe it

It doesn't matter if he is bad at Jordan, after all, the old gangster also has many black spots, but he is still perfect on the court. But it would be too much to always associate Jordan with Ah Tan.

I'm speechless. What did I gain by joining forces with O'Neal? Kill the bad fish instantly? Does it make any difference whether there are sharks or not? Problems arise as soon as you encounter a powerful shark. Then this shark is useless. The plot is really forced and disgusting.

Fifty-fifty with Kobe? Then just give the goat to Kobe.

Why does it feel like Roger has no cards? Someone who is dissatisfied always comes out and slaps him in the face. You have to say that in that era, the players were high-spirited, and the team boss should be the one who jumped out. It felt like every player would be dissatisfied. With no cards at all, did he win the championship in vain?

This year's playoffs really pissed me off. Jokic was bullying me and James is running slowly now. Ten years ago, I, James, would have gone to the Nuggets to steal your boss! 🙂

What kind of basketball god is he? It should be called the God of Tie-breaks

Laohe, can't you please call me your foster father?

It's about a protagonist who defeated Jordan at the top of his game in his debut. But when the protagonist was at his peak, even Kobe Bryant's level was passed by his teammates through their talents, almost relying on luck every time, so he still won the championship every year? Is it a hit every time I see it? What about dominance?

Stop writing about the main character being the god or savior of Atlanta. He was sprayed like 💩 by the visiting team fans at home. It was fun for the fans in the stadium to watch, right?

The best basketball article, the pinnacle work

Anyway, if the protagonist wants to win, he has to either be lucky or have a sure kill, and his opponent is always bursting with seeds.

I have basically read the books of several authors in the basketball section. I won't say this one is the best, but it should be considered the top three for basketball players. Not to mention noise, noise is considered a branch of coaching. There are some laughs, but nothing too poisonous. It was a little rough in the back, and most of the basketball culture was in trouble. This was considered okay. The Magic won three consecutive championships and the Atlanta Hawks won four championships. They were pretty good, but things started to go wrong later on. Overall, it's very good. I personally feel it's a little better than the one next door that was drafted by the Wizards.

The writing is quite good. Putting aside some minor flaws, it can reach 80 points. There are no bad points. It makes people want to read more. Two updates a day are a bit too little.

This book, I feel, is the ugliest book the author has ever written. It's pure white writing and doesn't carry a single thought. . . Get the ball and shoot. . . Just attack the protagonist directly. . .

The trash talk of this protagonist is really dirty, like Payton, Garnett and Miller. Why not write it like Rodman and Big Bird? It's not dirty, it just makes people's mentality. Even Rodman was written by you as someone who could only curse with his genitals.

This month's guaranteed monthly pass is given to you