The Heavenly Forge: Saving the Sword-Wielding Girl

This post is the final summary of the entire Sky Brigade plot. I don't expect to leave any traces, nor do I expect the author to learn any lessons. I just hope that the author can remember that there is a reader who has already explained everything clearly to him when he goes crazy. To resolve the plot controversy, the questions that need to be answered are as follows: 1. Where is the earliest breaking point of the plot? Answer: Ganju officially admitted that he and Firebird were the same person, and showed great strength at the beginning. This plot leads to the total collapse of the plot from two dimensions. 1. The strong strength makes Chamomile lose the sympathy of readers, and the constant concealment also causes readers to lose trust in Chamomile. Human nature always sympathizes with the weak, is jealous, and always wants to destroy the strong and downtrodden. It is an unchanging iron law that a tiger will fall and a dog will bully him. 2. The strong strength makes Ganju's previous humiliation and betrayal become extremely cowardly and ugly. 2. Why is Ganju's betrayal so intolerable? It's human nature to be cowardly, isn't it? Isn't it okay to endure humiliation and bear the burden? Answer: Cowardice that endures humiliation or intolerable cowardice depends on strength. The author likes One Piece, so I will use One Piece. Nami is a coward who endures humiliation and burden because she has no power to restrain a chicken. Cyrus was a coward who endured humiliation because his daughter was kidnapped and he was turned into a toy, without the ability to act independently. Even Robin is a coward who endures humiliation because she was hostile and abandoned by the whole world, but even so, she did not betray her companions, but chose to exchange her life for the safety of her companions. So, what is intolerable cowardice? Kozuki Oden is intolerably cowardly, because he is responsible for the safety of a country, and he has the strong support of Roger Whitebeard, as well as strong strength and loyal retainers. Those who choose to surrender under such circumstances will not be tolerated. Momonosuke is an intolerable coward. He is responsible for the rise and fall of his family. He is supported by pirates in the new era and is followed by countless people of Wano Country who risk their lives. Under such circumstances, people who still want to surrender repeatedly are intolerable. Ganju is an intolerable coward. She bears the hatred of the entire village. She has strong support like Qi Tian and An Ran. She is also capable of fighting one against three and overpowering the whole audience. She is also good at refining medicine and housework, and can do all decathlons. Such a person who betrays his companions and acts as an aide is intolerable. 3. If Chamomile resists, the lives of the protagonists and his younger brother will be in danger? Answer: There is never peace that comes through prayer, only the border dyed red with the blood of your sword and the enemy, and the peace within this border. Weiwei's father's compromise did not bring peace to Alabasta. King Riku's surrender did not bring peace to Dressrosa. Oden's surrender did not bring peace to Wano. The truth is that simple. From the beginning, don't pray, don't have undue hopes for the enemy, that's called Stockholm. 4. You have said so much, how can you be satisfied with chamomile? It's just a keyboard! A: Chamomile doesn't need to do anything else. She doesn't need to compromise, she doesn't need to be silent, and she doesn't need to commit betrayal called enduring humiliation. All she needs to do is face the enemy with a flaming fist that doesn't care about life or death. Use the sea of ​​fire to burn you, me, and everything. This is her best ending.

According to the author, Chamomile is the real core character of the first volume. This is true. In the first volume, chamomile is the intersection of all contradictions, the builder and tipping point of all powder keg. The two major contradictions in the first volume: revenge against the Sky Brigade and Qitian's dream of practice, the core key is in the hands of Ganju's two identities. To the Sky Brigade, she is a direct victim of Phytolacca atrocities, an abstract image of all the victims in the Sky Brigade's operation to suppress local snakes, and the most critical node of resistance to Phytolacca and even the concept behind it. As for the protagonist Qi Tian's dream of cultivation, she is the first producer of Brown Sugar, she is the benefactor who started Qi Tian's dream of cultivation, she is the capable general of Phytophaga, and she is the core engine of the ambition of the Sky Brigade. The root of Chamomile's unpopularity is that the conflict between the two identities is too intense and there is no room for maneuver. The person who is the biggest victim is also the biggest perpetrator. Even if moral concepts are discarded and only considered from the perspective of social rules, this is very difficult to accept. After all, just because Japan suffered two atomic bombs, you cannot say that it is a victim country and ignore Japan's atrocities in invading other countries. The first refutation point is that the author said that Ganju did not kill anyone, and he had always wanted to die, so he should not hate her deeply. Maybe it makes sense, but that's not how it works. Maxin, who invented the machine gun, never killed anyone with his own hands in his life. Emperor Hirohito, who started the war, never killed anyone with his own hands in his life. Those powerful people who enforce the law of the world and kill tens of millions of people with just a few orders may not have killed anyone with their own hands in their lives. So not only can't she be evidence of innocence because she has never killed someone with her own hands, but it is also a manifestation of heinous crimes, because she is the magnifier of Sky Brigade and Phytolacca's ambitions, and is one of the foundations of Phytolacca's atrocities. Not only is she not innocent, but she is extremely guilty. The second refutation point is that the author said that the biggest characteristic of Chamomile is entanglement. She is entangled in the fact that if she doesn't help Phytolacca, people close to her will die again. She was frightened. This is even more nonsense. There are so many ways to practice non-violence and non-cooperation. Use the stupidest method, commit suicide. If you force me, I will commit suicide. Anyway, you have killed the relatives who raised me, so I have nothing to fear. The more timid the police are, the more they will be threatened by terrorists. So from the beginning, don't give in to any threats. The problem with Ganju is that after obeying the threat, he began to regret it again, and then he desperately obeyed the threat again because of the male protagonist's pursuit of spiritual practice. Then he regretted it again and made the door-to-door delivery a subplot. Ganju said that the protagonist helping you get revenge is just playing house. In fact, Chamomile's series of actions are more like children's play house. You are playing games in front of you and repeatedly jumping into camps. You must know that there are plot penalties for frequently switching camps in the game. This is the third and more profound problem, the author's preference, which makes Ganju De unfit. The author gave Chamomile superior talents, special production techniques, and the life skills of a good wife and mother, but he did not give her the temperament to adapt to these. In other words, in order to satisfy the sentence "Chamomile is the core of the plot of the first volume", Chamomile is destined to keep adding drama, keep entangled, keep waiting, keep jumping sideways repeatedly, and finally collapse. In the end, the character completely collapsed and became completely OOC. Not to mention the fact that there are so many characters, the author is in a difficult situation and is not willing to write them to death. He must include the problem of the protagonist group. The author seems to respect the characters and likes the so-called "letting the characters play freely", but in fact, he completely treats Ganju as a plot tool and a puppet, which ultimately led to the collapse of the plot in the first volume. It seems that this is not the first time that the author has been in this situation. If he does not remain vigilant, he will destroy as many characters as he creates.

Seeing this, I really don't think it's a matter of slow progress. I feel like the author is too focused on foreshadowing the long-term plot and neglects to tell good short stories. So far, no story has made me feel that it is exciting or even complete. There is too much emphasis on the main plot of Phytolacca, while ignoring every small story in it, especially the branch plots. So far, I have not seen any characters in the branch stories that impressed me deeply. I quite like the author's writing style. I first read the Assassin book. The structure of the book is very clear. The beginning, transition, foreshadowing and climax of each chapter and story are relatively complete. This book seems to be too greedy, wanting everything, but in the end nothing is done well. Instead, it seems to be written as a short article about upgrading and fighting monsters. Most of the so-called character creation relies on dialogue rather than plot. My personal suggestion is not to let Phytolacca become the main body of the plot. Let the protagonist have his own life, his own journey, and his own story, in which the plot related to Phytolacca will be gradually laid out until the final battle. Of course, I am a standard science and engineering man, and I am purely talking on paper. I just expressed my thoughts after reading the previous single chapter and expressed my own opinions.

He said he didn't want to be a traitor until he surrendered to Japan. Only after entering the white house did he say that he didn't want to be ridden. If the mucus enters your mouth, throw it away. The child is starving to death and you need milk. Highlight a piece of music

Ganju's question is actually very representative, and to a large extent it reflects a basic issue in writing: "How do we design the plot so that the characters can express themselves without violating their own personalities?" And the author's approach is also very representative - turning on the left turn signal and turning the steering wheel to the right, under the banner of "fully unleashing the character's potential and making the character come alive", stuffing the author's own desires and his own character's private goods. It's a bit like a script editor trying his best to add drama to his favorite characters regardless of the rationality of the plot. But real actors will say that if they have acted in so many dramas, not to mention fatigue, the script will definitely collapse after so much effort, and they should not film the drama anymore. The characters in the book will not remind the author in this way. They will only collapse under the author's repeated tossing. In the end, they will be forced to arrange by the author, and they will not get the most dazzling ending. This is the problem with this book. Don't open your eyes randomly, don't block the plot, don't force the difficulty, just honestly tell a revenge story about a girl who would rather break than bend, and honestly hit the enemy with a flaming fist regardless of life or death. Don't engage in any kind of play-house style, let alone any useless love-hate relationships. It's not difficult, isn't it?

After reading Chapter 48, I feel that the protagonist is more like a native. He only knows that Dota or Goldfinger can only build things for Dota. For example, the alternative is to go to 600 miles to find the materials, which can completely build a bicycle. People who are good at bicycles can reach 140 kilometers per hour in mountainous areas. What's more, the protagonist is strengthened and can get there in one day ( I know the recipe for the card, but I can't make it. What I want to express is that the protagonist's thoughts and ideas are not in line with modern people's ideas) Moreover, choosing alternatives can also prevent readers from guessing, and will not make readers guess at a glance and feel boring Before going to the wild, you can also prepare items such as chain armor, paragliders, parachutes, hooks, hand crossbows, etc. For self-defense and escape.

For me, if there are too few posts on a book circle, I won't read it. Either the book is not good and no one reads it, no one comments on it, or the author is controlling the comments.

Eighty years ago, a great man went to Chongqing to attend the Hongmen Banquet. The subordinates believed that conflicts should be reduced, but he said: "Don't be afraid of conflicts. The better the fight, the safer I will be." Is this courage? Yes, but this is more wisdom. Dignity is not achieved by begging, it is achieved by fighting. The more violent Chamomile's reaction is, the greater the damage will be to Phytolacca's career. As long as she herself is not caught, the protagonist group and her younger brother will be safer. If she is caught, they must be well fed and served, because Chamomile may arrive at your doorstep at any time. Yes, chamomile can't defeat pokeweed, but can't I still defeat your men? Can you Phytolacca protect every one of your men anytime and anywhere? If you turn against me and kill my whole family, be prepared for everything of yours to be smashed by me. After all, you would threaten my weakness, wouldn't I threaten yours? Even if you are strong, take your time and cut your flesh with a dull knife, which will make you forget about food and drink. It will kill you sooner or later. I am the most vengeful woman, and I have plenty of time. Strong men in a world of high weapons must understand that they are nuclear weapons and do a good job in nuclear deterrence. Because as long as Phytolacca still needs people to work and join, he cannot bear the price of "being unable to protect the lives of his men." Ganju was fully capable of rubbing Phytolacca's face on the ground, but she gave in, and in turn, her own face was rubbed. This is the source of my sorrow for her misfortune and my indisputable anger. But the approach of great men is the real wisdom of survival left in this land. If we seek unity through struggle, we will unite and survive. If we seek unity through compromise, we will only become slaves in the end. I hope the author will stop responding to me. Continuing the argument will only escalate the issue, which is not good for both parties.

The comment was deleted just now. I would like to ask the author whether what I said makes any sense and whether it has broken any defenses? . Ps: I feel sorry for my 60 coins, md actually asked for money in the recent chapters

The protagonist does not make equipment for the sake of making equipment. He has other goals. He wants to experience more things and see more scenery, rather than being stuck in one place and becoming a master. Work for a better life, not work for the sake of work. This book is not a simple upgrade article, but a complex book that contains a lot of hard work by the author.