The African Entrepreneurial Saga

Given the author's background, trying to distance himself from Germany is simply a political novice. If you are not strong enough, after the first battle, I will beat the rabbit with the urine of the shit stick and kill you. In the era when bandits were rampant, it was either food or hunters.

I live in Africa, Ethiopia, and there are many thieves here. Many of my colleagues have had their mobile phones stolen, and they focus on Chinese people. There are many people in other countries who break into houses with knives and guns, and you don't even know about it in China. Now there is a war in Sudan, and my colleagues in Sudan are terrified all day long 😅

As the emperor of the Rhine Empire, you like to lick China so much. Why don't you give up the throne and merge the Rhine Empire into China? Don't you like it?🤔

The only advantage of this book is that there are few competitors. The subject of African nation-building in the 19th century is too rare. It has a lot of flaws. The first is the name. The purpose of establishing the empire and changing the country's name is to get rid of the stereotype of poverty and backwardness in East Africa. The African Empire is more useful than this ridiculous name, followed by water. I repeated a paragraph several times and went on for a long time, but finally came to the same conclusion. I am really glad that I only started reading this book recently. I can't imagine how tortured it was to read this book a few years ago. I read the whole book It's really boring now. It's boring. I skipped all the plots about Nanyang written by the author. I really don't understand. What is the purpose of going there? You said before that you should keep a low profile and don't want to attract too much international attention. Then you start committing suicide in the core areas of Nanyang. What is the purpose of grabbing Ryukyu? Are you afraid that you won't be able to fight Japan? If the Philippines doesn't compete with the United States, what's the point of grabbing a useless Ryukyu? Is it purely to disgust Japan? You might as well go to Japan to attract more women, it's more fun than this The most disgusting thing is the continuous suppression. The author's cognition cannot imagine what the concept of the unity of Southeast and Central Africa, a unified empire of 14 million kilometers and 80 million people, was at the beginning of the 20th century. The only shortcoming of that land is the stone. There is not enough oil, and agriculture, minerals, water, and land resources are almost invincible. If the protagonist has some brains, he should go north to grab the Persian Gulf. The male protagonist has decades of first-mover advantage. Electricity is also far ahead. There are two oceans in the east and west. The north and south are all weak countries. They are still in the center of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. I really can't understand why there is a three-pole struggle for hegemony in normal development? The Soviet Union was able to develop to the second place in the world by relying on two five-year plans. Africa needed people, land, and mines. The natural resources crushed the Soviet Union. There were no internal conflicts in the Soviet Union. It spent decades stabilizing the domestic industrial base. How could it be suppressed by the United States? Africa is seizing the European and South American markets. Coupled with its unique geographical location, the United States has lost its technological leadership and has lost millions of high-quality German immigrants. How can it still develop with only the little land in North America and Japan? Why can we still be two poles with Africa? The Soviet Union had a highly planned economy, so why should the United States? It is obvious that the author has limited intelligence and cannot imagine the impact of the butterfly effect at all This book is quite good at the beginning, after all, it is all micro. When it comes to macro-control after the founding of the People's Republic of China, it is obvious that his intelligence cannot keep up.

Before 1876, it was only right to grab so much land quickly٩(๑^o^๑)۶. South Africa is still small at this stage and needs to be compressed effectively to prevent the British from becoming bigger in South Africa. In the early stage, the Orange River can be used as the dividing line, so that the coal and iron resources of South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, etc. Can be collected and industrialization can be completed quickly. Later, they would find a way to swallow up South Africa south of the Orange River. The key point is that Hechingen's population in East Africa, with a population of four to five million, has completed preliminary industrialization, so that it will be difficult for any country to compete with pig's feet in Africa. A population of tens of millions is directly the beginning of the next ugly country. After all, the monarchy can beat the federal system by several blocks in terms of execution. The Boers can cooperate and absorb. The Boers are mainly descendants of the Dutch, followed by the Germans and the French. Dutch and German are also in the same language family and can basically be in common. Taking in the Boers will reduce the development space of the British. 44W The Boers tortured Britain to death. As long as there are a few million people and basic industries, Britain can fight in Africa

Well written and very plain.

One major flaw of this book is the Chinese immigrants. I don't understand that since the main character is a foreigner, you shouldn't get involved with the Orient. You weakened this point in the book and don't bring up Oriental things. The Chinese immigrants are convinced.

The last two chapters have been written about 💩, which is completely illogical and insists on helping the Far East. Where do you put the interests of your country? Writing blindly, butt and head are separated 😅

The more you write, the worse it gets. If you want to restrict the population at this time, can you maintain such a large country with such a small population? The more I write, the more nonsense it becomes. Not only is it watery, but it is also messy.

After finalizing the last few pictures, I feel sick to death. What the author means is that no matter Portugal or Britain, they cannot fight hard, so as not to anger Britain and avoid the fate of the navy. So does the decision-making power of the war lie with East Africa? Isn't it the British who have the final say on how they want to fight? Still holding on to the illusion that the navy will not end, the battlefield is not going smoothly, and the British navy will not end, why should we ask East Africa? Everything the author writes is entirely what he takes for granted. Forget about Portugal. If the British really want to fight, then don't have any illusions. Just fight to death from the beginning. There is no need to keep prisoners. They will be offended to death anyway and they will all be lost.