Between Dimensions

It's not like writing a novel at all. It's written side by side with Liu Cixin and better than Jiangnan. What kind of novel is this? It's a masterpiece! A masterpiece!

In this world, some roads must be faced and traveled alone. No matter how long or far the road is, no matter how dark the night is, you still have to walk it alone and silently. -- Xi Murong

The Golden Angel chapter is also quite interesting. After reading it, I immediately thought of Harari's "A Brief History of Mankind". The book tells that the fundamental reason why humans can stand out from the beasts and why Homo sapiens can exterminate other human species and dominate the earth is that Homo sapiens has evolved the ability to "tell stories." Because of the ability to "tell stories", Homo sapiens can unite and fight for an illusory thing that does not exist at all. Through "storytelling", Homo sapiens can empathize and transfer knowledge more easily. In essence, "telling stories", that is, creating an illusory concept that does not exist at all and making everyone believe it, is "lying". Therefore, lying is an innate ability of human beings and the basic driving force for the advancement of human civilization; people who do not lie cannot be called human beings in a civilized sense. For the world in the novel, the existence of heaven is so ridiculous. Only those who do not lie can go to heaven. Then only babies who die at birth can go to heaven. Isn't a paradise without lies more like "hell"? For humans, not lying is a kind of torture and a kind of spiritual castration. Looking at it this way, it might be a good thing that Lu Qiao lied in the end. At least from that moment on, he could become a normal person - in the eyes of others, he finally started telling the "truth".

This book was very confusing to read. The author has a lot of great ideas, but the writing style is really far-fetched and I can barely read it. I actually like this book very much. I vote here every month for treasures because I don't want it to be pornographic. But I really can't stand it. The tone of voice and thinking mode of each character are basically the same, there is no sense of three-dimensionality, and the richness and gorgeousness of the novel are not at all. It feels like I am rushing to finish the story~~ Fortunately, there are many typos~~~ Even so, I, a Virgo proofreader, insisted on reading it. The content is really good, even if the writing is a waste of the story, I can bear it! The author might as well consider slowing down his writing and thinking more about the writing of each chapter. It would be okay to write one chapter in two days. Now that you have developed your storytelling skills, and coupled with your great brain, you will definitely be a great master. The current data is not good, so more updates are not always better. The basic readers of this book are still very loyal and willing to accompany you to make progress. We can afford it.

After reading Margaret's two stories, I found that Lu Qiao in the author's description had almost lost all "humanity" in the story, and everything he did was perfectly in line with the characteristics of "gods" or "angels" in the New Testament. In the entire story, Lu Qiao, as a person after the collapse of human civilization, did not inherit human "humanity". Instead, as a "god", he gave "apocalypse" or "guidance" to the artificial intelligence Margaret 63. This setting is very clever. The "resurrection after death" section in the second chapter is too Christian. The Son of God died bearing original sin, and was resurrected and ascended to heaven three days later. Luqiao, as a "god", forgave Margaret 63's original sin due to her "human nature", thus leading to the arrival of a new world or "heaven". Different from the "human nature" promoted by humanism as truth, goodness and beauty, "human nature" in theology is essentially the eight original sins of man. As for "kindness, tolerance, honesty", etc., These are divinities. Only when people have divinity can they be called saints. Interestingly, throughout history, the progress of human civilization has been driven by "original sin" in most cases, while "truth, goodness and beauty" have been the brake pads of human civilization, preventing it from going all the way into the ditch.

It's a very good book, but it's a pity that I can't calm down to read it. I'd like to vote for it.

It's really well written, and the author has great imagination.

I was surprised to see the question "Create a stone that God himself cannot lift." This is a very famous theological question. It seems to directly logically deny the existence of God. In reality, however, it did not undermine the status of theology. Theists have excellent refutations of this. This is a famous rebuttal from the past, which is extremely interesting. I prefer to present it in the form of dialogue: "Can God create a stone that even he cannot lift?" "Aha, of course, he is omniscient and omnipotent." "How to create? If he creates it, then he cannot lift the stone. There is at least one thing he cannot do. If he cannot create it, then there is at least one thing he cannot do." "Aha, look, doesn't this just show the greatness of God's omnipotence? We don't know how to accomplish this at all, but God can do it. As for your inability to understand, of course you can't understand it, because you are not God. If you can understand this, what is the difference between you and God? You can even do this that we cannot understand at all. He is the great God!" Of course, some people pointed out the logical fallacy of this question itself, and it was widely accepted: The stone that cannot be lifted does not exist, which means that the essence of this question is to ask God to do an illogical thing. And this is meaningless. Asking this question means that you are tacitly admitting that "there is a stone that cannot be lifted no matter what," and this itself is a false proposition. As long as a stone has weight, it must be able to be lifted. The kind of stone you ask about doesn't exist, so how can you expect this question to be meaningful? Just like when you asked "How to prove 1+1=3", you already assumed that 1+1=3 when you asked, but this is wrong in the first place. How can you expect the question "Prove 1+1=3" to be meaningful? Therefore, it is not that God is no longer omnipotent, but that the questions you ask are meaningless. Such questions are obviously meaningless for theological discussion. Looking back at the first rebuttal, you will find that it is actually very interesting. This explanation has a deceptive meaning of "since you are unreasonable, then I am not unreasonable either." Haha, so this may be the reason why the second explanation is recognized, after all, it is more "reasonable"? Isn't it interesting?

When there was a shortage of books, Dian Niang recommended the author's "Light, Short, Scattered". I fell in love with him at first sight, as if I had found the feeling of watching the story show back then. Later, I read some short stories of "Zhuan, Shen, Li" and "Soft, Transformed, Things", which left a deep impression on me. The ones he wrote are "Devil's Corner" and "The Game of National Destruction". The author has a very rich imagination, and the high-intelligence stories he wrote are amazing. I am still reading "Between Dimensions", and I plan to read it after I have fattened up. 😁 I wish the author better and better.

The starting point is convulsing

The short story I first came across with Keba a few years ago was probably "Softening, Transformation, Object", and then I finished reading "Light, Short, Scattered", and just happened to start the book "Turn, Leave, Leave", and now "Between Dimensions" has been subscribed to now. These books have been fully subscribed and read. No matter how many short stories I read, "Between Dimensions" It was so amazing every time, but after reading the epilogue of the last chapter, I really felt sad. How could it be that no one needs your story anymore? So many of the stories you told are really good stories. I can still read short stories from that time to this day and I am still fascinated by them. It is a pity that I don't know why the subscription is not good.

There are a lot of typos, sorry if they cause discomfort. It will be fixed within a week, I try to speed it up as much as possible. Please also help me mark the content with syntax errors. Thank you all and let's make progress together.

I remember that this author seems to be the leader of Qidian short stories

Everyone, come quickly~~~

The starting point is convulsing

I just watched it today. After watching "Margaret", I think it is still really awesome. The following is my personal opinion: In Qidian, I am used to reading long stories in a continuous pattern of 0~~~1, but short stories always read in an intermittent pattern of 0~1, 0~1, which is not very adaptable. The long story is a big story that makes people unable to put it down; the short story can be put down at any time after reading a short story. Moreover, you will feel tired after reading a story, whether it is a long story or a short story. This makes reading multiple short stories at once more tiring. (The feeling of exhaustion can also be said to be the feeling of gain from reading a novel. After reading a story, you get an experience. In the case of short stories, you get multiple experiences in a short time. Personally, I feel tired easily.) Having said so much, it does not prevent me from feeling that the writing is awesome. I looked at the number of fans, and they were too few. I just had over fifty, which was seriously inconsistent with my strength. 🕖It is still a long-form mainstream website, and short-form articles have obvious disadvantages in online articles. Short stories feel more suitable for publishing, Zhihuyan, public accounts, Weibo, and self-media. I don't read short stories, but I accidentally read a light short story one time, and I thought it was awesome. But... I didn't read the whole book. . . Because every time a story in the book ends, it is a full stop. The book is very good, but the starting audience doesn't eat this dish very much. The creativity is great. I look forward to integrating, summarizing, sorting out ideas, and creating a "mainstream Internet article" that is in line with the mainstream people in the starting point.

From the earliest beginnings of Qingshuan, to the softening, turning away, and finally to this dimension, the author's story-telling ability and storytelling ability have been maintained very well. It is easy to immerse yourself in this short story. Personally, I feel that the biggest improvement of this new book is the addition of a main line, but it does not destroy the independence of each story. Then the length is shortened to three chapters. The plot is still attractive and complete (although the corresponding chapter is about 5,000 words), and the connection of related short stories is still great. As for each story, it also has a certain depth, but what attracts me are the wonderful stories (laughs).

Such books are rare in Qidian and difficult to write, so I cherish reading them 😎 Awesome, author, come on

I paid a full subscription on WeChat and read the entire book. I deliberately went back to the starting point next time to comment. The writing is really good, I recommended it to two friends and they both liked it very much! Thank you for your work, keep up the good work! !

This is the first time I found the introduction to be of such high quality. If it hadn't recommended it, I wouldn't have known you had published a new book. Yysy, I really like the continuity of these stories. The content of the stories is not only interesting but also profound, come on!

Well, actually I haven't read it carefully yet. I'm keeping it on the bookshelf for now. I'll read it when I'm fattened up or when I finish the book. Come on, the short stories are really good. The short stories must be excellent. I'm definitely the first person in the short stories. And the avatar looks very cute. The author must be very handsome! What a handsome guy! Brackets deleted I have been re-reading Softening Things recently, and I remember that the book I started writing is Softening Things. The strange title of "Softening, Turning, Things" made me read it several times without clicking on it. The more times I saw it, I was in a shortage of books. After reading the reviews of Utopia Book Friends, I went straight to Qingduan Sanli. As expected, the short stories in Qingduan Sanli were more attractive to me. I was fascinated by each short story. It was very refreshing and enjoyable! As a result, I didn't have much interest in reading the semi-length version of Softener later on. This was also the case in the later stages of Zhuan Sheli. Now that I'm interested again, I immediately reread it! While this energy is still there, maybe I'll watch Between Dimensions again after finishing the softening and turning around, or if my interest dies away again after a while! Anyway, keep it first.

Why is it in the new book recommendation?

Since it takes me a long time to vote every time I finally changed the top of my bookshelf

I just discovered that the main character in almost every book by the author is named Lu Qiao, haha This short story is really interesting. I have never seen a better one. I like this way of writing.

Why is this book here?

Hey, hey, hey, swallow my post...

I read this novel about two years ago. I was a high school student at the time and didn't have much money. I read a pirated version Come to pay for it now

Lu Qiao in "The Godfather" was forced by life to write a book. He had good ideas but not enough writing skills. The author feels the same way. Although it should not be because of the pressure of life, but because of love, but he also has good ideas but lacks writing skills. Anyway, we are not just a fast-food article. The author also has plans to write a long novel. Why not think about the words and sentences of these stories? How about trying to make this novel more perfect? 😁

I just finished watching the first and second seasons of Love to Death, and suddenly I felt that the short stories written by this guy gave me a feeling of Love to Death. When I first thought about whether I should watch Love to Death or the short series, I was very impressed.

I finally found you. I don't know which software I used to see your dimension and then I stopped thinking about it. I like it so much.