The Queen's Will

I really like reading the western fantasy Lord Farming and I have read a lot of it. I saw a lot of people complaining about how the female knight should not respond to the plot setting and so on. But this is the third Lord Farming I have read in recent years, apart from letting go of the witch and the dragon is dead. The others are either ignorant and novices, making all kinds of awkward remarks or just boiling water. Of course, this book has some flaws, but what book doesn't? To be honest, these people who complain should read other types of books.

It is written above that the society was very hierarchical, the lords occupied high positions, and the knights at that time were loyal to their lords. A female knight comes out and wants to kill her own lord. What does it mean to do nothing? It's okay to doubt the first time, and it's okay to doubt again, but after the first time, you have to admit your mistake openly and then observe secretly, instead of being sarcastic and sarcastic to the protagonist over and over again. The female knight is not even as good as an ordinary person. The greatest advantage of knights is loyalty. Nobles train knights because they are loyal. This is also the heritage of old nobles. Knights are similar to domestic slaves. They have always lost loyalty since they were young. They are absolutely loyal, how can they bite back their masters. In such a dangerous environment, wouldn't the protagonist be afraid that she would betray him if he didn't remove her from her position? Who would keep an unstable being around? Is forced kneeling real?

It's so hard to write a new book from an author who doesn't have a platinum title or something like that. Come on, I remember the last time I followed Lanke Qiyuan, there were a lot of negative fans in the first few dozen chapters. Nowadays, when some readers see new authors, they can't help but want to show off their "old bookworm" skills, so they don't care so much, and they just spray some words without thinking. This book gives me a good feeling so far, but I still hope that the sense of mystery and excitement is stronger, it would be better.

I don't know why so many people criticize the female knight part. First, the female knight is the knight of the younger sister. To put it bluntly, she can completely ignore the male protagonist. Judging from the content of the article, it's just that this persona doesn't please some readers, so there's no need to criticize him as useless. The female knight is obviously only responsible for her sister, and the sister obviously doesn't understand everything about the female knight. To put it bluntly, she can't control her 100%. With the character of the female knight, relying on the relationship between the male protagonist and his sister, her own strength, and the appearance of the male protagonist before time travel, I don't think there is any problem at all in attacking the male protagonist in various ways. If anything, the hero should ask his sister why she can't manage her knight, but obviously with the character of the hero, this is unlikely to happen. It is even more unreasonable to bypass the younger sister and go directly to the younger sister's knight. The vassal of the vassal is not my vassal, and although my sister is not a vassal, the male protagonist does not have the right to directly order the female knight to do what she wants. To be honest, at a time when fantasy is becoming more and more demonic, this book is one of the few that I can follow without hesitation in recent months. It can be seen that the author has made an outline and thought about the plot carefully, instead of just adding one chapter after another at a glance like many books. Nowadays, many other types of books also use fantasy skins to gain popularity, and the editorial management does not seem to care at all. Speaking of which, this is one of the few serious fantasy films that is well written. Be human, book lovers, and let this book live. Or do you like to kneel down and kowtow when you see someone? Are all villages called villages? A fantasy where everyone uses chopsticks? Everyone eats Chinese food? Inexplicably, he cooked up a dish that made everyone look like they had taken opium~ The same thing? Even Chinese people have their own preferences for national dishes. No matter how handsome you look, a straight man who can't bend is just a man who can't bend. Please don't take your culture for granted, like those Japanese people who speak Japanese all over the world. As for the complaints about the shortcomings of this book, I hope that book friends can speak up and point out the problems, instead of just using their lower bodies to complain and let them feel good about it. As for the posts of trolls, I hope that well-meaning book friends can calm them down, and the author has no need to pay attention to them. The more you argue, the more aggressive they become, and in the end everything you say is your fault.

Why is the female knight attacking the protagonist? In a highly hierarchical society, as a vassal, you want to kill your own lord? And then the protagonist still pretends that nothing happened? Speechless, the protagonist has nothing to do with her in such a dangerous environment. Aren't you afraid that she will suddenly betray him? Is it to show off your writing skills and force yourself to kneel down to the truth?

I see that everyone is unanimously talking about the plot of this book, and the views are obviously the same. I'm afraid it's not because I've been fooled. Everyone is a fan, but this is a black fan. Please keep your eyes open and don't follow the trend. This book is indeed a good book. What is the meaning of cool writing? A good book is one that has connotation. Do you have to watch the protagonist with pig's feet pretending to be a slap in the face? Haven't you seen enough of so many novels like this?

Maybe the noble council will embezzle the protagonist's interests, but they will definitely ensure the inheritance of the protagonist's title, because that is their foundation. No one can guarantee that their family will not have an heir. Those nobles know best. They will embezzle the protagonist's interests, but they will definitely ensure that the protagonist's base is still there, and will also help the protagonist fight against the king, because the king is the common enemy of the nobles.

After reading dozens of chapters, I really can't stand the female knight. Since the world view says that lords have great authority, why do we need to set up such a character? Doesn't it violate our own setting? No noble would put someone next to him who would endanger his own safety, and twice, and he doesn't respect himself at all. If you let the protagonist's subordinates see it, wouldn't it seriously damage his prestige?

I can't say it's too poisonous, I can only say... It's a bit poisonous. No matter what my family background is, my father is a marquis, I am an earl, and I have a princess fiancée. Even if my family is poor, not everyone can step on me. The poor can try to plot my property and my status. A viscount came to frame me and kill me. I can understand that it was the instruction of other counts and marquises. A little priest wants to punish me with an exorcism ritual? A domesticated sister's guardian knight can come and kill me? While writing about what aristocrats are like and how big the gap is between aristocrats and poor people, others are bullying the protagonist? I've read about fifty chapters, which doesn't mean you can't suppress your desires first. This kind of suppression made me feel blocked.

The author visits the club more when he has nothing to do, so that the protagonist's knees will be harder. Don't kneel down if he is a woman. After all, this is not ten years ago.