The Berserker in Marvel Wants to Die in Battle

The protagonist joins S. H. I. E. L. D., A win-win cooperation. But in the eyes of some people, if you don't take advantage, you will suffer a loss, and your export will become dirty. Say that the protagonist was deceived, nt, what did the protagonist pay and lose?

Seeing that there are constant controversies about mutants in book reviews, I would like to share my personal analysis of the reasons why mutants in the current starting point of Marvel fan fiction will collapse in the middle and later stages. Text below. One, the most important is also the most important. A large number of authors have only a limited understanding of American comics. They only gradually understood Marvel heroes, including the world view, after Marvel opened the movie universe. Please do not deny that it was indeed the movie universe that introduced American comics into the country and popularized them. Meanwhile, the movie universe is divided into the X-Men series. Avengers series (this includes individual hero movies. The fourth version of Spider-Man, Dutchman, many people are now discussing the most powerful version. Sony Cinematic Universe series (Venom, the third version of Spider-Man is also the Garfield version). Independent Universe (Spider-Man first) version (actually this version is an old-fashioned movie and should not be included, but I still include it.) And the second version (Toby version) (there are also the four big guys who can't get around, the Fantastic Four. (The Fantastic Four can't get around the Silver Shadow, Uncle Tun) When you are using the world view of the movie universe, the X-Men series and The Avengers series should be separated. This is not an issue with the author, but an official issue with Marvel, not just because of copyright issues. Because their plots are inherently incompatible. The most obvious thing is that the most basic situation in the Avengers universe is that the storyline revolves around several first-generation Avengers, while the X-Men series is the most basic. The basic situation is that all humans in the world have a recessive X gene. You understand what this means. In terms of major events, there are more than twice as many major events in the mutant story as there are in the Avengers series, and there are also differences like playing with time. Now there are different ability systems, different characters, and differences between the comic universe and the movie universe. For example, in the comics, the Scarlet Witch's power comes from the ability to experiment with chaos magic (creating and annihilating matter) and modifying probability, while in the movie universe, it is the ability given by the Mind Stone. The gap between the two is different. You should be able to understand. Moreover, if the movie universe adds mutants, the three famous mutants, Magneto, Professor, and Gretchen. Comparing the two sides, what will happen to Iron Man if he is controlled by a magnetic field? How can he be like a good boy like the Hulk in the movie universe? There is also Gretchen. With the setting of the movie, the scene is too beautiful. Friends who read American comics know what is the tradition of American comics? No. What is that? Can I tell you how many universes there are in Marvel? There are no less than 200,000. The main universe of the comic universe is 616 and the original setting of the MCU is 199999. And the universe where the X-Men is located is earth-10005. What does it mean? The universe, coupled with the collapse of the painting when encountering major events, will be restarted if it cannot be solved, and then other universes will be opened continuously. Third point, the author's problem is half-understood. As a reader who likes to read American comics, some authors are really speechless. They transfer the official settings, but they haven't copied them all. The original official settings have loopholes. You still only copy the loopholes with little knowledge, but you find that the previous circle cannot be closed, who will collapse if you don't? A simple example, a setting shared by the Avengers universe comics and the movie universe is that there is a price to pay for using magic, and then the interesting thing happens in some Marvel comics. In the novel, it does not include comics, but it includes Harry Potter and the like (yes, let me talk about the Locus series) Magic can be used by the protagonist, and Doctor Strange uses it for fun. Isn't this funny? Do you really think that Doctor Strange is the Ancient One? Heng endorsed him. That's the problem. Of course, most readers only know about the Marvel Universe and can enjoy it half as much as the author. This is of course no problem, because you are a reader. But the author is different. There are loopholes in the setting, and neither official wants to. The author said that if you merge the universes that you are unwilling to take the trouble to reset, what will be the result? The novel collapses like a cliff. No matter how strong your writing skills are, you can't merge them together unless you forcefully integrate countless worlds and then apply your own settings. At this time, the cultural heritage and writing power of an author will be reflected. The background refers to how well you understand the story,) What is the situation that this leads to is what is said above. As long as the mutants are not collapsed, there is no one. Including the trajectory series, you are talking about Deathstroke, the principal, and various knights. You can ask these authors in order to depict the official events. To unify the ability system and solve the official loopholes, how many scalps have been scratched and how many hairs have been pulled out. Of course, I am just saying this to tell everyone that when I write about Marvel, I am not saying that it will definitely collapse if you bring in mutants, but because most authors do not have that ability and cannot control the collapse of the ability system after bringing in mutants. Failures and flaws in the setting. Please believe and understand that it is not that the Marvel novels will collapse, but that the author is useless and his ability is not worthy of his ambition. The above is my analysis. Please give me your advice. I will humbly accept the corrections from other fans. It depends on my opinion.

I feel that the protagonist is a bit too irritable, even if he fights, he can't control his emotions at ordinary times. In terms of character design, he can actually be normal at ordinary times. Even if he is irritable, he doesn't always change his shape. After all, others don't know the protagonist's situation, so they can easily label the protagonist as a dangerous person. For example, S. H. I. E. L. D. Will do risk assessments for all people with abilities, if the protagonist keeps doing this. According to SHIELD's style, there will inevitably be a war. It is very likely that he will become a decent person who can't get along with him, and he can't stand the villain. But it may also be in line with the protagonist's pursuit, leaving no worries in this world, just being a passerby who only wants to die in battle. (Of course it's just a personal idea, it depends on how the author handles it. Even reckless men have their springtime. Just make it interesting.) By the way, let's think about it. The protagonist must be getting stronger and harder to die. But the protagonist's ultimate goal is to return to Earth, and seeking death is only a method. When this method becomes more and more difficult. Thinking in reverse, the Tomahawk of Clearing the Way reaches the top level. The protagonist becomes the God of War and has complete control over the Tomahawk. He can choose a battlefield on the real earth, directly reach the earth across the multiverse, and return home successfully.

Reminds me of another protagonist who wants to die in order to go home, and then is attracted by death. Emmmm, don't ask, it's the curse of immortality if you ask.

This may not be the first time that Pigfoot has been abducted and time traveled. Every time he dies, he deletes his memory and returns to the original time and space. However, his instinct to die every time makes him a reckless man, even when he returns to the original world. Even playing games is Olaf.

Often in those stories where the protagonist thinks about how to keep a low profile and how to get a reward if he dies in a reasonable way, the result is the opposite. Basically, all kinds of mindless operations are counterproductive or the system forcefully breaks the plot. For example, there is a system for traveling through other worlds. The system gives a message that as long as the system dies reasonably on the battlefield, the protagonist can return to Earth and become a billionaire. As a result, the protagonist sets the goal of returning to Earth and becoming a billionaire. Why? I would like to ask, if you think about it differently, when you go to another world, you can work hard and experience a different life. If you fail, you will probably go back and become a billionaire. Is it much more refreshing to have this kind of mentality? However, in the end, you end up being unwilling to engage in brainless operations, just like the hypocritical Versailles. Even if you don't become a multi-millionaire and just return to the original earth, it's still a guarantee. You can do it boldly with confidence. It's boring to be cautious.

Why are the protagonists of the current invincible flow either naive or stupid, or both? Can't they just pretend to be b-flow in the traditional way? It's obviously a standout and fun way to write the invincible flow, but in the end, such a protagonist seems to be about to sneeze, but he gets stuck at the last moment and can't play.

Author, please re-learn physics 😅 Your common sense of physics is outrageous

In Marvel novels, when mutants appear, few authors can control them, and they tend to collapse (with the exception of Dr. Chen Ang). Since the author of this book is guaranteed to be fine, I'm looking forward to it. I hope it's not a plot twist

After Thanos is over, what else is there to do?