You've Only Cultivated for a Few Years, Yet You Claim to Be an Immortal

I feel that the format of the academy is in line with my fantasy of the future society, combining learning and practice, and at the same time, everyone's wisdom can participate. I wonder what book friends think?

Because currently, the protagonist's philosophical thoughts in real society are at the level of a typical philosophy enthusiast who has read a few books and some popular philosophy videos, and this level of philosophical thinking can actually be used by the protagonist to crush the thoughts of this world of immortality. Then I can only say that the immortal cultivators in this world are all wastes who are not strong enough in Taoism and do not have any logical thinking. So this book is actually no different from the novel about Tai Chi beating another world 20 years ago.

It feels like the biggest problem is that the protagonist's worldview is always right. Others' will always be naive and popular, blind. I think the author should focus on the collision of different philosophical views rather than the crushing of the protagonists. If the protagonist blindly crushes and shows off, the life of the book will be very short.

Looking at it now, the overall situation is pretty good, and I hope it can go further. It's a cool novel, and it's also a fantasy genre. I suggest you focus more on the plot and less on philosophy. The wonderful plot mixed with a little bit of philosophical thinking is the finishing touch. A lot of philosophical thinking mixed with sporadic plots will only make people feel confused.

I listened to Chapter 27 of the book and wrote a review. Liang Cao is a bit of an invincible stream. There is nothing poisonous about it. It has some jokes and is quite satisfactory. Personally, I feel that although it is written about philosophical cultivation, it is not actually the path of spiritual cultivation as imagined in philosophical speculation. Instead, it sets a cultivation background that is consistent with the protagonist's philosophical learning content, and then the content reflected by the protagonist can restrain other people. It is a golden finger with poor information, rather than a real discussion of philosophy. The story tells that the protagonist is a storyteller in the beginning, who is actually a cultivator. After returning home, he meets someone from his mother's sect who comes to exchange skills, which leads to the protagonist's understanding of the skills being different from others (telling the understanding of the cave story in Plato's Utopia). , Encounter a two-headed snake, give a sermon to the two-headed snake (Freud's self and id), this is also the anchor of the novel's cultivation system, and then tell the story of the cave on a wheel, emmm. In short, after solving this branch line, a new character, another cultivator, will be introduced. The immortal is blocked from crossing the river on the way. The new character talks to the protagonist and asks the protagonist to help solve the problem. The middle process is skipped. The main thing is that the protagonist understands the skills and crushes the other party's Shinto system and solves the other party, which then leads to a new story, the chapter of the jujube tree. In short, it is not difficult to find that although the story involves relevant philosophical content, it actually gives the protagonist a golden finger that can solve other people's problems. It is not really about philosophy. If you want to read philosophical thinking, you will probably be disappointed. If you want to see some different systems of cultivating immortals and have a certain interpretation of the content of cultivating immortals, this book is still good, at least it is much better than others that don't talk about anything

This novel is not a traditional cultivation of immortality. It mainly attempts to use philosophical concepts to explain cultivation of immortality. It is a road movie, not an action movie. Advantages: The genre is novel, and road movies focus on storytelling, which is more suitable for the novel format. Traditional immortal fighting is actually more suitable for animation. Adding philosophical theories to the framework of cultivating immortality allows readers to think, and is not a mindless piece of writing. The writing is okay. Disadvantages: 1. The protagonist's growth trajectory is problematic. Road movies need to meet each story to grow. They cannot grow through exercise and encountering enemies like action movies. The protagonist's growth is not linear, but the enemies appear linearly. As a result, the protagonist encounters a cheat code breakthrough and is temporarily invincible. However, the enemy becomes stronger and stronger, and he does not change, but he appears to be getting weaker and weaker. Hold on until the next upgrade point, break through and become invincible, and continue to weaken. In the middle of each upgrade point, the protagonist is in a weakened state. In ordinary fairy tales, the protagonist starts off weak and slowly becomes stronger. Or be invincible at the start. The protagonist of this article is invincible at the beginning, gradually becomes weaker, becomes invincible again after finding the secret code, and then continues to become weaker. Not in line with Shuangwen. 2. Insincere flooding is serious. Some authors add meaningless descriptions or plots that can be skipped. The author of this article is a bit insincere in his comments, copying large sections of previous content. It's just a sword technique, with the same adjective before every move. It's repeated several times, and the same applies to the enemy. It's like watching the ultimate move animation thousands of times while playing a game. You can't skip it because it will make you feel bored. It's a pointless plot, at least the author thought about it. Pasting and copying is something the author never thought about and shows no sincerity at all. 3. This article type has a small audience. Road movies have a smaller audience than action movies because it is more difficult to tell a good story to bring pleasure than to bring pleasure from fighting. They also add weak philosophical theories and bad jokes, resulting in a smaller audience. 4. The protagonist's goal is unclear, his driving force is small, and his growth is small. Road movies must give in to the story, and use the story to feed the protagonist and achieve the purpose of growth, so it needs to witness more stories. This article changes the story through the protagonist exporting his own ideas. He has not grown up, so encountering stories and fighting cannot make the protagonist stronger. He can only be forcibly strengthened through constant cheats and treasures. Ordinary cultivation of immortality is about Taoist priests training themselves, while cultivation in this article is about missionaries preaching.

The plot is very witty, the character actually rejects the cultivators of immortality because they harm too many people. It's as absurd as someone who doesn't allow themselves and those around them to make and use guns because they harm too many people.

The fact that you traveled through time shows that consciousness can exist independently of matter. The theory of practice refutes dogmatism and empiricism. The protagonist repeatedly talks about some theories in reality, which is a dogmatist error in itself.

Interesting, but there is a bit too much salted duck 🙂

Such a big mind and such a high level

After reading Chapter 43, I realized why I always felt weird but couldn't figure out the reason. I would also like to thank the book friends in the chapter review for their controversial points, which helped me discover the problem. To put it bluntly, the biggest problem with this book is not to export opinions or philosophical concepts at all, because as long as it is a human being, it must have a preset viewpoint to output information. Every perfect adult has his own set of methodology and three views, and everyone's three views can never be exactly the same. Unless this person is a complete yes man and a brainwashed person. Or maybe teenagers have been seduced into forming unhealthy thoughts, otherwise a person's speech must carry his own, highly personal information. And humans, social animals, are bound to desire communication. Well, it's just like I want to stop vomiting now. Okay, I'm going a bit far, back to the topic. At present, the biggest feeling given to me by the author is not actually whether it is professional or not, or whether it should be discussed at length, because no matter how the novel is written, there will always be a preferred audience, it's just a difference in size. But from my own perspective, the most critical problem is that the author's point of view expressed by the protagonist is too ungrounded, too condescending, and too out of touch with the masses. For example, in Chapter 43, the protagonist asks questions like a madman. But look at what questions he asked? Why is a stone a stone? Do you think this is an issue that cultivators would care about and pay attention to? Do you think this is the question the protagonist is seeking? The core question of the protagonist at this time, the fundamental thing that he wants to explore, is what is cultivating immortality, what is the purpose of cultivating immortality, and what is an immortal. And can you really become an immortal like this? Can such cultivation of immortality really be successful? What will you get in the end by cultivating immortality like this? This system of cultivating immortals divides realms in this way, so what are the differences between different realms? Why divide realms? What is the immortal his senior brothers want to become? What is their purpose of becoming immortals? If they are simply pursuing immortality, and their current cultivation system can indeed meet their requirements, then is it really necessary for me to waste time asking them about this? And the most fundamental question that extends from this is, what is the difference between this and myself? What is his purpose in cultivating immortality? What is the difference between the immortal he wants to become and them? So what should you do? This is what you, the author, describe, a protagonist who has a methodology, a mature outlook, and is good at using philosophical systems to think. Judging from the current performance, the author, your protagonist has fallen into the metaphysics of spring and snow. This is contrary to the more simple and materialistic popular tradition of our country, and is also somewhat deviated from the soul of our Marxist philosophy today. Of course, it doesn't mean that you, the author, can't write like this. I am just a social person here and want to express my own opinions.

Damn it, if you want fantasy, don't withdraw from philosophy. It's far-fetched. If you are a good person, why should you and me withdraw? The saying that "three clears and three corpses are killed" is to cut off the cause and effect, not to engage in schizophrenia.

Nowadays, writing novels is a real volume. Those who study mathematics write about academic hegemony, those who study physics write about going back to the past and the rise of great powers, and those who study philosophy write about cultivating immortals... There are also a bunch of lip beads writing about emotional output. Every track was packed with people.

This book is about cultivating immortality, but it is not entirely about cultivating immortality. It is essentially about cognition. Everything else is good, but the long paragraphs of philosophical speculation make people have a headache. People who study philosophy are so nagging that at the end of the study, they feel that they have become immortals and have seen through everything. Then it doesn't matter if others think he is crazy or a freak.

After seeing several of the protagonist's questions to the Dharma Protector, I feel that the author may not have read a few philosophy books, or may not even have finished reading one. I just watched a few videos online and knew a few questions. When I saw the master, I couldn't stand it anymore. When I was using people, I acted like a cow or a horse. When I didn't use him, I immediately lost contact. This time, it was even more the case. After I got the information I wanted, I turned against the person and refused to recognize him. Not only does the protagonist appear to be unsympathetic, but he is also rude and does not understand the basics of being a human being.

I looked through the comment section, and all of them were arguing, what the hell! Not doing anything practical at all! Let me tell you! Can the author disable anti-theft? 🙂

The introduction is too out of place and boring. I suggest you change it.

Because God can make a stone that He cannot lift and yet be able to lift it. This seems contradictory. This is because people are limited in the real world, bound by logic and the laws of the world, so people cannot do things that violate the law of contradiction. But God created the world, created logic, and is transcendent. Human reason is consistent with the existence of the world, so God cannot be understood using human reason, but can only be understood using faith. Therefore, religion is irrational, faith comes first and is the prerequisite for cognition, and extreme religion is very dangerous.

Cultivation of monsters who have been fucked and even eaten people😅

I feel like the narrative is a bit similar

I can't think about this book in detail, and I can't figure it out even after thinking about it. Why can personal cognition affect the size of other people's world? I understand practicing Buddhism and Zen. What is the method of sword cultivation? If you say it is Gewu, I can understand it. This sword cultivation seems to be a traditional cultivation of immortality. It depends on the adaptability of the skills. If all the monks in the first three realms seem to want the same realm, then the sect should have explored a common education path long ago until Jin Dan has its own direction. , Just like going to graduate school to have your own research direction. If cognition can reach the corresponding state, and the protagonist also has the method of enlightenment, why is there no direct golden elixir? If you still need to accumulate spiritual energy, it seems to be no different from tradition. And why does the Wuding Sect use people to make elixirs? Although it was crushed like an ant, it must have its own advantages if it can be evenly matched with the Zen Sect. In short, if you read it in one go, you can get caught up in the plot, but once you finish it, you will feel that many places do not make sense. I hope it doesn't end up being that the protagonist is the reincarnation of some powerful person or has an extremely high status or something.

This woman affects the senses too much. . . Let's downplay it as soon as possible.

Philosophy and Immortality, you can watch it if you are not open-minded, but it is boring if you are open-minded.

Is the title of the book a reference to seniority? Kneel down in front of seniority 😭

After reading Chapter 3, why does the pig's trotters have to fight against the Dharma Protector? Isn't it okay to just change the exercises?

What are you insinuating? Don't be afraid to check the water meter🥵

Nowadays, the settings of those immortality novels are basically the same. It's not that they are not good-looking, but I am tired of reading them after reading them too much. I admire such authors who have the courage to open up new ideas. I hope that the author can continue to work hard, his grades will get better and better, and his thoughts will flow like a fountain. The key is to write more!

Are there any book friends who remember asking the mirror? I was shocked when I first saw it, but now I realize it's just the same set, it's still a low-profile one!

It's better than most of the books on the monthly ticket list. What is a novel? For us old bookworms, it's just an inexplicable idea coupled with straightforward and easy-to-understand writing. A book that can be read is called a good-looking book.

Some people look in the mirror and dress appropriately, and some people look in the mirror and curse. Constantly making accusations that are divorced from reality is nothing more than self-objectification and labeling oneself accordingly. When someone else is discussing something, they say, "Why are you scolding me?"