I Livestreamed Building a Shelter, Then the Apocalypse Really Happened

If it were an apocalypse that could only be nourished by a shelter, then China would definitely be the happiest in the world. No one knows exactly how many holes China dug in the face of blackmail.

The first chapter said that the signing fee was only 3 million. When I read Chapter 20, everything must be the best. Not counting how much it costs to take down the mine, just the 30 million to build the 10th floor is not enough.

Whoever writes Doomsday Shelter, I'm here to support them

The writing is too rigid, with a lot of professional terms piled up. This is a novel, not a design manual. These professional terms are not organically combined in a narrative style, but are stuffed in a rigid form. It seems that the readers are not the readers of the novel, but the construction engineers. This matter requires a certain amount of moderation. Too little will make the novel seem empty and unprofessional, and too much will make the novel appear arrogant. Only the right amount, appropriate insertion methods, and appropriate explanations can perfectly integrate these hard things into the article. This book does not explain most of the professional terms. These are not things that everyone is familiar with or can interpret literally. Many of the materials and equipment you mentioned are things that readers do not know the difference or function. They can be written down and used directly. Readers cannot rely on text descriptions to construct any picture in their minds. The novel is like an incomplete model. One part of the plot is empty and another part of the plot is empty. This situation is like the author who made up the plot in his head but did not write it out. Is it appropriate to expect readers to fill in the unwritten plot in the author's mind? If that doesn't work, how about inserting some pictures into your book? In addition, I feel that the focus is slightly out of balance. There is too much space to renovate the shelter, and the part about infrastructure construction is also too long. The detailed description of each step of cleaning is certainly immersive, but the appropriate length and short rhythm can also maintain the reader's interest in reading.

I found that in many novels, the plots are written very naturally... It just feels like the protagonist will develop how he thinks it will develop. There is no contingency plan for sudden situations. One line comes to an end and the final ending

I still like to read vernacular novels. This kind of novel that describes a bunch of expressions and tones in one sentence is really not suitable for me. The corners of his mouth were wide open, he took a few breaths, and the fan-shaped image under his eyes was described in detail in every paragraph. I really can't understand what is written 😰

Brother, I don't recommend that you always write about the protagonist's sharp eyes and ejaculation. Occasionally, you can also express a tough character by writing about it. It's a bit uncomfortable to write too much.

It looks like it was cut. . . . . .

Why are there so many repeated conversations in these two chapters recently?

Overall, it's pretty good. I voted for a monthly ticket because I wanted to complain about why the products are shipped expedited every time. Before starting work, you must conduct an on-the-spot investigation on what you need, and stock up on goods in advance. It seems a bit awkward to rush shipping every time.