I Brought the Mount Shu Game to Life

Have you been to Shushan? I wrote some things randomly, taking it for granted.

Have you ever practiced immortality? Are you just writing randomly?

Without indifference, there is no clear ambition; without tranquility, there is no far-reaching goal. Learning requires tranquility, and talent requires learning. Without learning, there is no way to expand talents, and without ambition, there is no way to achieve learning. If you are impatient and slow, you will not be able to stimulate your essence, and if you are dangerous and impetuous, you will not be able to cure your nature. Years go with the times, thoughts go with the sun, and they become withered and withered. Many people do not take on the world, and they stay in the poor house with sadness. How will they be able to get back to you!

This novel is seriously anti-intellectual in its worldview and character logic. The most ridiculous part is that the author has created a concept of "superstitious science" that completely goes against the nature of science, and portrays the scientific community as a conservative, ignorant, and negative clown who rejects facts. Science has never been a sacred and inviolable belief, but a research method based on evidence, constantly revised, and with objective reality as the only criterion: draw as many conclusions as there is evidence; for phenomena that cannot be explained, study, revise, and even overthrow old theories. This is the core of science. When supernatural phenomena such as immortality, magic, and vitality truly appear in front of the world, the first reaction of the normal scientific community may be shock, but they will never close their eyes and deny it for a long time - they will immediately invest in research, incorporate these phenomena into a new theoretical framework, and even try to quantify, reproduce, and apply them. This is not a fantasy, but the instinct of science in facing the unknown. But in the novel, the author repeatedly uses the same cheap trick: having scientists and public officials stubbornly deny the facts that are already in front of them, and being "slapped" in the face repeatedly by the protagonist, in order to create a sense of satisfaction. The problem is: this kind of slap in the face is simply not tenable. It is understandable once or twice in the early stage, but when the mysterious phenomenon has been made public, the scientific community still collectively pretends to be blind and stubbornly resists, completely contrary to the true attitude of the scientific research community towards new fields and new breakthroughs in reality - especially when it involves huge benefits such as disciplinary revolution and technological breakthroughs, the speed of acceptance will only be faster. Once the character's logic collapses, the foundation of the entire worldview collapses. The biggest attraction of modern cultivation literature is the real collision between mysterious power, modern society and modern science. Modern profiling has collapsed, and the so-called "slap in the face" has become a self-talk, with no real sense of dislocation and no real intellectual crushing. The reader's sense of superiority and satisfaction are naturally greatly reduced, and the pleasure of reading is also gone. This is not nitpicking, but the core framework logic of the story is not established. The protagonist seems to be very good, but he has never really had a convincing collision with science or modern society. The so-called crushing is just the author forcibly reducing the opponent's intelligence.

The writing is quite good, but a single chapter is too expensive. A long series is cheaper, and the flow is long-lasting! You can't catch fish without exhausting the lake! They all look down on it. From 20 to now, a single chapter costs almost 5 cents. It's too expensive!

Has anyone read it? Could you please tell me what you think of this book? Is it the solipsistic type?

Some people are funny. They don't like this book, so there's no need to say that it's a fake. Other readers come out with a few words of support, but why can't they just say that they don't like it? This really knows how to change concepts! It's just like if you don't like someone, you are free. If you call the police and say that someone is a bad person for no reason, is that right? If you don't like what you read, you just watch it. People you don't like are bad people?

It's been a long time since I've seen such a comfortable novel. Nowadays, the novels are either about revenge for killing one's father, hatred for taking away one's wife, or bullying by evil young men. Sometimes people who read them are very angry. And this book will make people smile even if it creates conflicts. If the author can maintain this rhythm, there is no doubt that the fairy grass!

When I read it for the first time, it was like chewing wax. Reading carefully is like eating a big piece of cake😢

I saw a lot of posts saying that no one discussed the plot in the comment area. As an old bookworm, I would like to share this spontaneously. I ordered this book in one go and read the latest chapters. I have been following it for the past month. The author has avoided some poisonous points very well. The writing is smooth and comfortable to read, and the plot is also good. Repeatedly pulling back and forth between abstraction and rationality, many people ask whether it is a one-of-a-kind type. My personal understanding is that it is, and it is not. The article uses abstraction to cover up the swaggering release of spells, but the spells are not very abnormal. This may be related to the fact that the plot has just been laid out, and the combat power should not be broken in the later stage. The main plot is the construction of the Immortal Cultivation Sect (in modern times), and the protagonist builds the Immortal Cultivation Sect in modern times.