Opening a Martial Arts School, with Batman as the First Disciple

The first disciple is Batman? To be honest, I don't really like the character Batman. In my opinion, what he did is completely contrary to his goal. Being a superhero is actually of little use. The main problems in Gotham are gangs, corruption, and super villains. But none of these can be solved by a superhero; There is also his oath not to kill. It is his business not to kill, but what is the point of being locked up directly? Didn't all the villains run out in the end? It's not in vain, and which of those villains is not worthy of execution? He only needs to ensure that the law can be enforced fairly and justly, because as long as the law is fair and just, those villains should be executed. Ensuring that the law is enforced fairly and justly will not violate the oath not to kill, right? As for the abolition of the death penalty by the white left, the white left is nothing more than a tool of capitalists, and the Wayne family is a very influential capitalist. The United States is a country of capitalists, and the Wayne family is a capitalist family. What he should and can do most is to use the influence of the Wayne family to change Gotham, instead of just being a superhero Batman.

When I was a kid watching Batman, I always felt that he was very pedantic for not killing people. He only has something to show for himself when he grows up. Only discussing the plot and characters of the work, Batman is certainly worthy of admiration. Some people even analyze why Batman can't kill people, whether he can use his power to rectify gangs, etc. However, as a cultural icon, Batman no longer only represents himself. His non-killing is a representative and embodiment of the Western spirit of human rights and justice. In fact, at the very beginning, the germination of this idea of ​​human rights was the bourgeois resistance to the feudal aristocratic system that deprived citizens of their rights of life and death, which was of positive significance. It focuses on personal values, protects civil rights, and allows judicial decisions to replace the feudal "rule of man." But everything changes. When capitalism wins, the dragon slayer becomes the evil dragon. Western capitalists turn judicial decisions into who is rich and who can achieve greater judicial victory, distorting the essence of judicial justice. Batman is a typical representative of this twisted product. On the one hand, Batman himself is a big capitalist and must strive to maintain judicial procedures and not lynching. On the other hand, the distorted justice he maintains has become the biggest obstacle to him punishing crimes. We might as well take a look at Batman's creative background. The peak of DC's creation was in the 1930s and 1940s, a period when the feudal monarchy was in decline and Soviet communism was still in its infancy. Capitalism reached its first peak. Capitalists began to divide classes and brainwash the people. DC heroes who generally came from rich and handsome backgrounds were born during this period. This is in sharp contrast to the Marvel Universe, where most of the poor come from poor backgrounds, because Marvel's peak was in the 1960s, and that was the period when the Soviet Union's communist ideas collided and the American hippie movement was in its ascendant, with the rise of civilian ideas. Back to Batman, it was this superhero who was born when the power of capitalism reached its first peak. He was born with the cultural gene of maintaining capitalism. Therefore, his kindness is limited to charity, his justice is limited to personal actions, and his fairness is limited to sending prisoners to the American courts in the back gardens of capitalists. Batman obviously can't kill, which is more ingrained than Superman's inability to kill, because Batman is a human being, and if people can kill people at will, capitalists will be restless. For comparison, the chivalrous culture of ancient China emphasizes killing the rich and helping the poor, the assassin culture emphasizes the wrath of a common man, with blood splattering five feet, and the uprising culture emphasizes the contentment of one's own kind. No matter you are a wealthy businessman, a powerful person, or a king, if you do not do well, someone will kill you. Although late ancient China domesticated literati, restrained generals, and imprisoned their thoughts, this cultural tradition continued in a more civilized way. American Batman is different. The chaos in Gotham City comes from poverty, and poverty comes from exploitation. What Batman actually fights is not the gangs, but his own class. He rebelled against class according to the rules created by the bourgeoisie and was doomed to fall into a reincarnation that could never be broken. Perhaps this is also a foreshadowing of the end of capitalism.

When Voldemort arrived at the "Planet of the Apes", he originally wanted to pass the level quickly with a wave of a stick, but he found that many things from Muggle researchers were unheard of "What is a virus?" "A gene is something that can replicate itself in the human body?" "Can the soul replicate?" Then Voldemort had another weird idea - - It's strange that he doesn't think wrong - "If Muggles use viruses to protect the brains of old Muggles and enlighten monkeys, they should also be able to use viruses to carry me, in other words, the wizard's soul information. Then wouldn't I really become immortal? Dividing the soul into seven parts is easy to catch them all in one go. What about the 200 parts (referring to Ovo)? 333 Million copies. ?" And this also has an unobtrusive advantage, that is, it makes full use of the emotional power of Muggles. As we all know, powerful magic requires strong (or firm) thoughts and emotions to mobilize it. Compared with wizards, besides not being able to cast spells, Muggles have "no facial features, limbs, no consciousness, no emotions, and no blood." "("The Merchant of Venice") In Voldemort's view, in addition to lurking in the human brain and inheriting the "soul meme", the virus that is about to take shape also has the function of absorbing excessive emotional power and concentrating it on the top of his wand, the "Lord of the Phylactery". By that time, who in the world can resist the beliefs of hundreds of millions of people? Who can resist it? ? So Voldemort ordered several Muggle researchers to abandon the stupid "monkey-to-human virus" and instead research the new "if everyone gives me a dollar virus", and reluctantly split a piece of their own souls, giving this virus a trace of ignorant spirituality. Finally, before the teacher arrived, the virus passed the third phase of clinical testing (it did not) and began to spread around the world. But the power of emotions did not help Voldemort ascend to the throne as originally thought, but was sucked into an unknown space... Question: What do you want magic for? Answer: Call the wind and rain/immortality/control the mind/find a succubus... Many voices, whether white, black, or pink bubbles, mixed together and intertwined with each other. All the mixed voices were finally summarized into four words: "response to all requests" So, in Hogwarts, what is the closest to the four words "responsibility to all requests"? …The Room of Requirement. Since then, there has been an urban legend in the world: When you have a certain "firm belief that you must do something" or have some big ambitions, just hang out in the streets, alleys, and giant shopping malls; when there are many people with you, but no one is looking at you (including cameras), the strong belief will "stuck" you into a dim space, leading to unmanned supermarkets, swimming pools, endless stairs, air-raid tunnels and other rare and uninhabited places. Space; where you may meet teammates, or may not meet anything. After you defeat enough monsters (monsters generated by various human thoughts), a child with a small stick will appear, satisfy your deepest wish, and send you back to the world after "forgetting everything". Some people still remember the child's last mantra - "Damn virus, where did you do me?"

The author is one of the best writers on this subject that I have ever seen! If you look around casually, most people will list the abilities gained by the protagonist, then pretend to be cool and slap them in the face, and then the apprentice will just take care of them like a tool. Personally, I feel that apart from cheats, the most important thing about this subject is the bond and story between the protagonist and his students. So far, the interaction between Bateman, Harry, who has played a long time, and the protagonist is very good! Bateman's no-kill principle and paranoia, Dumbledore's reasons for not intervening in Harry's unfortunate childhood... The collision of ideas between different characters is really exciting! Looking forward to the appearance of the next villain and new student who are persecuted by the protagonist. Finally, I wish that the author can code 10,000 words every day. Please ask me and I will do anything! (?) Finally, I wish the author, teacher, a happy life and smooth work♡(*´∀｀*)(*´∀｀*)♡

I give this book nine out of ten points. The one point deducted is due to the looseness of the power system. The protagonist has gone through hardships but remains kind. After gaining power (plug-in), he remains calm. He then relies on this power to improve the world, is extremely protective of his own people, and ruthlessly kills his enemies. At the same time, he has a sense of responsibility while changing the world. For example, when he accepted Batman as his apprentice, he warned him, "Once a teacher, always a father. If you learn something in the future but don't use it on the right path..." And the latest treatment of Tom (Voldemort) is simply perfect. Beauty, Tom will not escape from being imprisoned in Azkaban for life because of the protagonist. After various reshapings of Tom, let him save the world of "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" with the mindset of "beating Harry". I think this is the most advanced way to "whitewash" Also I think that since we have to mix various world views, the world views of domestic works can also be mixed in. As long as the main story background and character characteristics are clearly described, the most interesting thing is actually the collision of the ideas of various distinctive characters. This is really interesting

The author's writing style made me feel that the protagonist is a real person, yes, it is a personal feeling. The protagonists of many novels are almost the author's puppets. The protagonist is created by the author, but he cannot live without his own thoughts, will, and even feelings. What I hate most is that kind of time travel in the first chapter, and then immediately determines one's lifelong goal, and all subsequent actions are only for that goal. In other words, when writing a composition, the central idea is pointed out in the first paragraph, so there is no need to dwell on it. Many novels, such as cultivating immortals, only deal with cultivating immortals. There are no basic necessities, food, housing, and transportation. There are even no ordinary people in the perspective. It seems that the world is really only about cultivating immortals. The protagonist saves those children, sees the darkness of the world, and wants to do what he can. This is real. Without a golden finger, it would be nonsense to just want to change the world. The supporting characters also have their own thoughts and feelings, and they are not there to set off the protagonist. Well written, keep up the good work, monthly tickets are provided, please update soon.

I could have lived for a few more months, but the author got the proportion of the protagonist and the apprentice wrong. If the protagonist is too strong, the apprentice's growth should be emphasized. At this time, the protagonist can just disappear and watch the apprentice walk out of a different life. As a result, the author keeps emphasizing the protagonist, almost invincible, and yet giving so much proportion, your protagonist is not as good as Dr. Chen and Magnetic Field Guy.

Some people in the comment area are almost convinced. Without Batman and Bruce Wayne, the US government would have abandoned Gotham City long ago. Bruce Wayne has built a large number of apartments in the music scene for the poor to live in, and invested in subways, high-speed rails, orphanages and various clean energy sources. No one has mentioned these, right? Dian Zhongdian read a few comics explanations similar to Pale Knight, and then felt that he had seen everything, right? Batman has been a character for decades, and there are flaws, but so many authors have polished him, do you need to come up with conspiracy theories?

Is the author not good at writing? In the past, various settings and inner thoughts of the characters did not occupy too much content, but now they are really becoming more and more watery. Take Dormammu as an example. From his arrival to defeating him, it took three chapters, and more than 60 points were almost all the thoughts of Dormammu and the protagonist. There was no character interaction. The plot has advanced a little, but it took more than 60 points and more than 10,000 words in three chapters. Is this reasonable?

Can you feel how desperate I am? This time I will lose at least 500 points, woo woo woo.