Give Weak Women a Heart of Steel

Very interesting, very interesting, one of my favorite books

Come on＾0＾~

After skipping through dozens of chapters, I personally feel that the protagonist of this book is really twisted. It may be that the author's writing skills are not strong enough. The author seems to want to write about the "weak mentality" and "strong mentality" discussed in some serious literary works. He wants to write some stories in which the protagonist bursts the ideal bubble of "weak women"'s self-imagination, so that they can recognize reality and fight back against the suffering of reality. However, when I was reading this book, I did not feel the strong spirit of the protagonist, who is "cold in the face of thousands of people, bowing his head and willing to be a coward". I only saw a guy who despises the suffering of others to gain a sense of superiority. His methods of saving "weak women" are extreme, his purpose is not pure, and the protagonist himself is not a "strong man". This results in a distorted perception of the reader. And in this extremely twisted rescue process that struck me as particularly ridiculous, the male protagonist turned the "weak woman" into a kind of "believer" instead of a real "person". Really, it's hard for me to accept it. I thought the author would write about how a "weak girl" could become a "superman" herself, but in the end, the idea was only superficial and crude. Finally, I hope the author will take a good look at the "Three Transformations" thought from the philosopher Nietzsche

The result of the drug test: There are ideas, but the writing is not good. The rescue that the author wants to write has a darker style, which is to constantly use suffering to break through the bottom line of the female protagonist, in order to achieve a "self-awakening" result. If you think of rescue as a game, there are three endings: good end, successful rescue bad end, failed rescue true end, blackening or suicide Logically speaking, in fact, this kind of dark rescue is more likely to lead to bad and true end, but it seems to me that the male protagonist has never thought about whether he will achieve a bad or a true ending, but firmly believes that his method must be a good ending. If not, it must be that the damage is not deep enough. This is too presumptuous. Either the protagonist is a bit darker, saying that this is the fastest and most beneficial way, and that if he cannot be saved, then respect the fate of others. It doesn't matter if you achieve bad or true. Either the protagonist should be whiter, say that he has made preparations and will not let her die, say that he feels a little guilty but you must learn to be strong, and show the protagonist's efforts to avoid bad and true or feel some guilt about his own way of saving. This article does not consider bad and true at all, which is a bit self-righteous. I cannot get the advantages of this character, maybe other book friends can. In my opinion, the protagonist can be a virgin, rational, dark and cruel, and honest and simple, but the self-righteous character is really not likable.

The twisted approach, the twisted people, the superior protagonist, it has a very Japanese feel to it, quite twisted.

Damn, it looks like giving a weak girl the steel of her heart (๑˙ー˙๑)

The iron heart of a man of steel is faith and goal. As a minor, Hinayue believes that she can change when she becomes an adult, but now she still needs to be patient. The protagonist, because he can have basic food and clothing, naturally despises the heroine and thinks it is cowardly, Suppose, as an adult, you have an elder and a younger one, and your salary is only enough to support a family. When you face difficulties from your boss and colleagues, and you are not an indispensable figure, should your patience be defined as cowardice or strength? The protagonist's This approach is not self-righteous. Those who impose their own ideas on children and say that it is better to teach a man to fish than to teach him to fish. With a character like Hinazuki, without the murderer and the protagonist, he will not be humbled in the future because of the "cowardice" that the protagonist considers, and he will get rid of the shadow of his mother.

A very strange book with a very strange description of mentality. The protagonist is more like a childish pervert.

Kanai

After reading Chapter 20, I wonder if this male protagonist is sick? He has an inexplicable superiority, but the things he does are emotionally sick.

I feel like this kind of subject matter is not suitable for the current environment. There are so few people watching it.

Isn't this really youthful illness combined with bullying?

Emmmmm, the protagonist stands from a high angle and helps the girl in what he thinks is right. It is very twisted. I always feel that there is something wrong with the three views and is distorted, but it is not that distorted.

A bit like the dangerous girl next door, but with a strong Nissin flavor

I thought patience meant strength, but it turned out to be cowardice When you lower your head with an expressionless face, it seems that you are enduring for something, but in fact you are making excuses for your own cowardice, because sometimes the price is not very high, but you are just deceiving yourself in order to make excuses. But what does it mean to be a "Heart of Steel"?

Especially those few chapters after it was released, does no one really think so? I always feel that the protagonist is full of self-righteousness, taking it for granted, and what he says is more middle-class than middle-class 😥

Heart of Steel? Give her the Heart Steel directly! When there is an enemy hero within 700 yards, a powerful attack against the hero will be continuously charged for 3 seconds. Charged attacks deal 125 (+6% of your maximum health) additional physical damage and provide you with permanent maximum health equal to 10% of this damage. There is a 30 second cooldown per target. Stack tens of thousands of layers and sink the island country with one punch!

After reading the latest chapter, the protagonist has indeed become weaker. He was originally written as an egoist but now hesitant to add a bond, but the method of saving has not changed. He looks forward and backward, either continue to be evil or clean up and save himself. There is no point in describing the protagonist all day long. The quality drops very quickly at the end of the Nishimiya chapter, and I feel that super powers are a failure.

The problem is a bit big The heroine is cowardly and suffers domestic violence, and is bullied by classmates and dare not resist, so the male protagonist wants the heroine to become strong and learn to resist, but here the heroine has actually tried her best to save herself, violated school rules, exposed wounds and other things So what does the protagonist do? He usually makes sarcastic remarks to the heroine, reveals the heroine's behavior to the domestically violent mother, and then lets go and leaves under the hopeful look in the heroine's eyes, allowing the heroine to be domestically abused. The reason is that he can't bear to see or hear the next scene? The master is kind-hearted and hates the poor? Afterwards, I lamented that the submissive girl was not pure enough. If you want to force it, you have to be responsible, that is, to take responsibility. If you let the heroine suffer domestic violence, you should read it exactly as it is. This is not only to understand the consequences of doing so, but also to protect you from taking responsibility. Cowardly, pretentious, is this your purity? A stranded fish feels the waves blowing over its body, and always fantasizes that it can be carried away by the waves, escape from this waterless land, and be saved ... Unfortunately, the waves will only beat her body over and over again, and push her further to the sand Perhaps, when someone digs up the sand, they will find that... Her body is buried here

The protagonist always wants the heroine to resist and keeps forcing her. But! No hope was given to the heroine, no thinking at all! What happens after you resist? Is the heroine a doll? She will think about it too! After thinking about resistance, what next? Where to go? Um? The protagonist doesn't consider these things at all, and just forces the heroine to resist. Is he forcing it purely to advance the novel?

I read twenty of them. How can I put it this way? For a straightforward character like me, I was a little angry and felt a little unhappy with the behavior of the protagonist. Maybe this type of book is not suitable for me to read. I also don't understand whether the protagonist's behavior really represents growth for the heroine? For the heroine, her hope is to wait until she graduates from high school and come to a city where no one knows her, so she can endure it endlessly. It is precisely because she has endured so much that she will cling to her false hope. After the protagonist took a photo of the heroine after being domestically assaulted in the warehouse, she longed for the protagonist to reach out and use this photo to... To save her who is on the verge of an abyss (in addition, I don't understand Japanese law. If I encounter this situation and find out that a classmate is being domestically abused, I will definitely ask him to call the police) and the protagonist uses cynicism to say that I am nice to you (using your infinite disgust for me to arouse your sense of resistance). Isn't it an act of adding insult to injury? It's like you stopped your bicycle on the edge of a cliff, and when you turned around, a dump truck hit you directly. 😅

If it is true, as the author and some readers believe, that Asasi is evil and deprives those caterpillars in dark corners of their right to emerge from their cocoons and become butterflies, then why should other evils be used instead? The so-called neither destruction nor establishment? With all due respect, it's good to break and then build again, but haven't you considered the other consequences? Is it really broken? What about the ones that are completely broken? After all, the plot of the novel can control the outcome, allowing Yuna to take that step to kill the prisoner and transform successfully, but who knows that in other possible worlds that are not described by the author or observed by readers, she is really screwed up? Do people still want to praise the birth of the brilliance of humanity and a heart as strong as iron? In the final analysis, facing the dripping blood and yearning for a beautiful redemption are just external things added to the characters by others. They are the different developments that we outsiders hope for. According to the dark logic of human nature in the book, these characters are the author's playthings. In order to express and pass on some values, they must make sacrifices and experience these pains. They have also become a pastime in the eyes of readers. Everyone comments on this with their own ideas. It is simply wonderful, cruel and wonderful, haha. I have to say that the effect is still significant. At least for me personally, it caused me to think about the real good and evil, and I couldn't sleep: I know that there is too much evil in this world, and too many people are experiencing pain. But after I realized it, I can only say that the author's writing style is too spicy, just like Mr. Lu Xun once criticized the old society. As a young man in the new era, it is still difficult for me to muster the courage to look directly at it. Personally, I prefer someone to sigh like the teacher when he saw the world map, "The world is so big, how many people are suffering" and then lead us to fight against all this. It can be said that I am relatively weak. At this moment when I have this idea, it is just like the weak Yuna in the article, which makes people hate him. Although I also hope to be like what is said on the Internet, teachers: don't worship me, netizens: I want to be you, but in terms of my personal weakness, I feel that I am happy to have such a great hero stand up and lead us out of hardships and hardships. Let me immerse myself in this happiness more, it will be fine for a while, and don't let me go through these sufferings with the characters in the article again.

It feels like the heroine has been snatched away after redemption.

Gradually vulgar, and finally vulgar intolerable.

I haven't watched the back part, but I enjoyed watching the middle part. It's right on the radio. I compare this atmosphere. The protagonist detective with weird personality and the villain with weird personality each use their own superpowers to complete their own "beliefs" and fight against each other. There is no official background of super powers, just the struggle between the protagonist and different objects and the competition of beliefs.

It's over? When I first read it, I felt like I was going to enter the palace, but in the end I actually finished it. I can only say that the author is really good at it. Although the writing style is a bit immature, the spirit of persisting to completion is worth encouraging.

I'm fed up with this fantasy writing mode of constantly changing maps (beautiful girls)

As the title states, a person reads a book based on his own factors, such as his or her personal worldview, outlook on knowledge, and values. These concepts originate from each person's different experiences. These different experiences and one's own feelings form different people. Then the root cause of reading a book is different people. Therefore, different people will inevitably have different evaluations when reading the same book. Because I have nothing to do, I summarized a template for reading from my personal perspective (the word template is inappropriate because I can't think of other words, and this is just a personal perspective) Writing. . . I personally think there are three levels of writing. The lowest is the kind that people can't stand, the medium is the kind that can be read, and the normal ones can be read with medium writing (different factors are involved here). For example, I used to prefer novels with depth, but I don't like the kind of novels that are written by novices, but I have a good impression of novels with depth) type. . . Some people like fantasy, and some people like Xianxia, because an individual has different preferences at different times, and these different periods are determined by his different environments and different moods at the moment (take me as an example, I liked Xianxia when I was young, and after a while I started to I like fantasy cities, which is determined by my different moods. Now I like Japanese romance novels, and I even don't like them if they don't have Japanese names. Don't complain! This is determined by different moods) The characters. . . If a person likes a character, then the character will reflect himself to some extent, and he himself will also determine what kind of character he will like. There are many such as those that are decisive, gentle, and funny. Different characters will affect his evaluation of the book (also take my personal example, I used to like Fang Ping and Chen Pingan, then I went to watch Fang Yuan, and then I liked to read those kings, etc. Now I like the Tokyo Love Danger Game, mainly because of the sense of substitution!! If you ask me to read Fang Yuan when I like Chen Pingan, then I will definitely not have a great impression, this is because People at different times) Just like the purpose of reading a book is to have a sense of immersion in a character, then because of the difference in people, I will not like the Nine Dog Training Book for the time being. Compared with him, I will prefer the Tokyo Love Threat Game. The reason is just a personal problem In addition, what I said is not perfect, such as the plot, supporting roles, and many other things have not been added. There are definitely more than the three I mentioned above. It is due to my lack of personal expression ability and my inability to specifically perfect and express it. Everyone is welcome to express their own views and opinions, and at the same time improve my personal theory. Finally, everyone comes to Qidian to read novels, and pay attention to pleasing yourself. As long as you like it, read it, and don't read it if you don't like it. Don't get too entangled, and remember to please yourself, just like what I said, it is to please myself. Everyone should be able to understand my theory. If you don't understand, feel free to comment. You can help me improve it, you can complain about me, but at this moment, as long as you please yourself, it may be different in the future, because time can change everything. Everyone is different, don't impose your will on others.

For Dianbo articles, it is okay to match the Dianbo. If the Dianbo runs away or fails to match, it violates the laws of the market.

Recommend a book: The Super Fairy Grass Girl Arrives in the Land of No Sea