I Use Science to Explain the Supernatural

It's very well written and worth reading. I've already invested in it. The only drawback is that some parts are exaggerated. I guess the author knows this and deliberately left loopholes. In my personal opinion, exaggeration is acceptable, but the author could criticize it beforehand, leaving the reader with no way to complain. Wouldn't that be nice?

So, as we all know, the sun's primary energy source is nuclear fission. Since ghosts fear sunlight, they also fear nuclear fission. Therefore, if we drop a nuclear bomb on a ghost, will it die?

Wow, that's something else! I've been reading supernatural stories for so long, and I haven't felt a chill down my spine in ages.

I thought it would be about using science to solve supernatural problems, like that book where they used fusion to burn the supernatural in Tokyo. But instead, the protagonist barely survives, solves the problem, and then explains the process scientifically. That expectation was gone, so I'm out.

Since I learned to read book reviews, I've dropped nine out of ten novels. Some I thought were pretty good at first, but after reading the reviews, I was disgusted.

This article is actually quite well written, but the logic in the middle is rather disappointing. I only saw the section about Wuliu Village and two problems arose. Firstly, the protagonist kills all the monsters in Wuliu Village, but from the outside, Wuliu Village and its inhabitants appear real. So, after the protagonist defeats the monsters, why would anyone enter Wuliu Village?

I've finished reading it, and personally, I feel the plot of this book could have been expanded upon. However, due to strict government regulations, continuing to write it might get it banned, so I have to end it...

I've read up to chapter 60, and so many major events have happened up to this point, yet no one has discovered the existence of the ghost? Anyway, the author's writing style makes the work self-entertaining, like a cloak in disguise, lacking any real excitement, and just scratching the surface. The writing is actually quite good, but I don't understand why it's so crucial to conceal the existence of the ghost.

The author should be able to use this sentence.

From the initial frantic censorship of related information to the "Approaching Science" program and then the live stream, are these officials idiots? It's obvious they knew about the ghosts all along and blocked related news. Why are you making such a fuss and no one's coming after you?