From Textbooks to History

Create a recommendation building here. I will recommend many unpopular movies that I have watched to everyone in this building. Dear author, remember to read it😊

Clear the name of Wu Dalang! So you wrote this? ? ? Wu Dalang in history was the number one scholar, but he offended someone! There are many such things in history!

You use history covers in Chinese class,?

This book has the feel of an early starting work, with less water and more practical content. Moreover, the author is not good at writing about daily life and does not write, thus avoiding mistakes.

1. Huan Xuan was the youngest son of Huan Wen, born in 369 AD. He was only 14 years old when the story took place, and he was not conscripted as the crown prince until he was 23 years old. But judging from the author's writing, he is at least a young man in his 20s. 2. Huan Shiqian was the eldest son of the concubine Huan Huo. He followed his father Huan Huo to settle Jingzhou in 361, even though he was about 20 years old at the time. Then the author was already in his mid-40s when the story happened. The author also clearly stated in the article that he was in his 30s when he appeared. 3. Although the age of Huan Shikang cannot be determined, he should be several years older than Huan Xuan (mainly because Huan Wen came to have a son when he was old, and Huan Xuan was really too young). He was estimated to be around 20 years old at the time of the Feishui War. This is relatively consistent with the age set in the book, but the age difference between him and Huan Xuan becomes a problem. In addition, I want to complain, do you really think that everyone does not know the Heifu family letter? This one is really too lazy~~ Regarding the use of quicklime for disinfection in the military and the requirement to drink boiled water, it was clearly recorded in the military regulations of the Qin Army during the Warring States Period. This includes quarantining those infected with the disease. The common sense of the ancients is not as primitive as we think. If the author is interested, you can check Qin Lv. I saw it many years ago, but I don't remember the details clearly. Since the title of the book is "From Textbooks to History," shouldn't we be more rigorous when writing about these histories? How about checking enough information before writing? The book is really good, but it lacks rigor. I will continue to comment in the book review area, and I hope the author will not find me offensive~

Why didn't I see the plot of the math book?

It would be terrible if you put a physics book Change a constant and the universe will be destroyed in minutes

I just read Cao GUI's article on war, and I want to make a comment. Cavalry is not necessarily better than chariots. Chariots are an impact weapon, while cavalry is a mobile weapon. Their positioning is different. During the period of Duke Huan of Qi, the populations of various vassal states were small and their military formations were weak. Cavalry was not necessarily better than chariots...

The author didn't realize at all why the book faltered in the later stages. The author thought it was because each plot was different, and some people liked it and some didn't. That's not the case at all. In the final analysis, there is a problem with the author's writing. The system is dispensable. The system rewards are sometimes mentioned but not mentioned. There are no statistics on the protagonist's personal attributes. The protagonist often acts as a background board and disappears for more than a dozen pictures.

This cover. . . It's like a history book!