One Piece: The Fire Dragon's Roar

First couplet: A beer bottle hits the Yonko, and he steps on the future Pirate King. You want to ask me who I am? I am the bandit king of the East China Sea! Second line: I bit off an arm of the four emperors, swallowed the bandit king of the East China Sea, and asked me who I am? I am the king of the East China Sea! Horizontal review: King of kings

What do you want me to say? What the hell is this written about? Is a Pirates fan who doesn't have a harem, doesn't appear invincible and doesn't pretend to be a slap in the face still a Pirates fan? That's right! So damn classic! I have to say good books! Worship(＞＜)

I don't understand why there are so many people complaining. To be honest, I have read these two books no less than three times. The personal charm of the protagonists in these two books is simply overwhelming. I think the writing and plot are second. Even if the personal charm of the protagonist is not limited to two-dimensional novels, this protagonist also left a deep impression on me. Unfortunately, the author does not seem to write pirates anymore.

First of all, there is no absolute justice in this world, whether it is comics or the real world. Although there are scum in the navy (such as Colonel Mouse in Nami's hometown), most of the navy still protects the people. Even if they have to obey the orders of some Celestial Dragons, they can still be said to represent the righteous party on the whole. Even if they want to criticize, they are criticizing the World Government and the Celestial Dragons, not the navy. Do you want to criticize the military if officials in the real world are corrupt? The second is the issue of stance. If the protagonist of this book is a revolutionary army or something, then there is still a stance to criticize the navy (to maintain a corrupt regime), but as a pirate, what stance does the protagonist have to criticize the navy? Is it true that a bad person who does one good thing after doing ten thousand bad things is a good person, and a good person who does one bad thing is a bad person? Even if Luffy's pirate group seems to be doing good things all the way, in fact the impact is extremely bad. After people learn about his pirate group, whether they form it with the purpose of following or being inspired, it will bring disaster to the people. Luffy and the others can be said to have done no bad things, but what about the other pirates who were inspired by it? Who should be blamed for their mistakes? If you really want to have a pure adventure, can you set up an adventure group? If you want more complete justice, join the revolutionary army. Since the protagonist is a pirate, he has no right to criticize the navy's justice.

Killed her companions in front of baby5, and forced her to be tied to the ship using her setting that she would satisfy other people's demands. . . And also having fun doing it. . . You might as well kill her like this, it's just torture.

Empress, Robin, Nami, you have to accept one. In the end, you are single, and you are instantly out of mood.

Post an opinion ▶Momo 🐷 must die

The protagonist of this book does not look like a time traveler at all. Instead, he looks like a person from the world of One Piece. Compared with those brainless and wise fellow pirates, there is no comparison at all beyond a section.

Did the author offend someone? I obviously look very good, why do so many people criticize me? 😰

This novel may not be the most beautiful, but it is the purest novel I have ever read (I am talking about words)