The Fiercest Man in the Three Kingdoms

This book is very readable, with clear logic, reasonable plot, and refreshing writing that is well-founded and well-founded. Especially when the Yellow Turban Rebellion didn't start at the beginning. Moreover, people are ambitious, and it won't work without certain conditions. Reputation, connections, money, power. The setting of the protagonist's background in this article is reasonable. In ancient times, people's wars were all for profit, from the monarch down to the family. This is a good point and makes sense. In the Three Kingdoms, Sima Yi's hollow city strategy was intentional because he was ambitious and had not yet prepared the foundation, and Liu Bang's lackeys were also necessary. Xiao He wouldn't be able to survive if he didn't ruin his reputation and reputation because of corruption. Anyway, if after the reunification of the war, your fame and reputation will overshadow the real owner, you will definitely go to jail and die. Even if he is rehabilitated later, the dead person will not continue to increase his reputation, but the living person will. Hahaha, hahaha! ! !

If you don't include Guan Yu, it would be perfect. The three sworn brothers in Taoyuan are too popular because they become rivals. It's unscientific to make the protagonist a god. Without rivals, it's not exciting. It's not interesting to have the strongest in the Three Kingdoms go to one side. It's all fictitious. For example, why not fight Guan Yu and the others? The popular generals all go to the same side. What are you looking at? The same goes for civil servants. They are all here with you. Writing someone as a polished commander is not interesting. 🌚

A librarian, who had only traveled through time for three or five days, convinced a group of counselors and found a girl from a wealthy family as a partner. She was even physically capable of fighting against military generals and could train and lead troops. In short, except for the protagonist, they are all mentally retarded

In this novel, my favorite character is Lu Xuan. I think Lu Xuan is a man who is literary, talented, wise, humorous, passionate but not sentimental. He is like a cheat in the author's writing, constantly escalating! The character of Lu Xuan really amazed me, but there are also shortcomings - the protagonist has not encountered any setbacks (this is purely a personal opinion, don't criticize if you don't like it).

Not bad 👌

The article is not only written with great literary talent, but at least it will not make people feel uncomfortable, and the plot is also good, which can make people motivated to continue reading. This is a pretty good book I found this week. I recommend it with three votes and one thousand gold coins. Keep up the good work.

As an old bookworm who has been reading novels all year round, I can only say that the plot of this novel seems to be quite enjoyable, but many details are really insulting to the IQ, such as calling the emperor by his first name, Zhou Yu is willing to spend 500,000 catties of grain and tens of thousands of acres of land to save Sun Ce. Da Qiao fell in love with the protagonist because he uttered several famous poems and articles. I am really speechless. It is just excerpted from history and forced into the protagonist, without any of the author's own ideas.

This book is really good I feel pretty good about this book. I have read 150 chapters so far. Among these 150 chapters, the plot can be said to be wonderful. Although it may be different from historical facts, this book gave me a different feeling: First of all, this book is different from other books that travel through history. It does not follow what others say, which is one of the reasons why some people don't like to read it; Secondly, the author's writing style is very good, and the plot is tense and coherent; Furthermore, the author did not write randomly, some were adapted from historical facts, and some added his own ideas. In fact, some aspects of this book are not good. For example, when the author writes poems and articles, the meaning of some poems and articles may not be relevant to the scene. The above are my personal views and thoughts. I can only say that everyone has their own preferences for carrots and greens, and my thoughts may not necessarily be everyone's thoughts.

Historical themes are rarely read. Those are the only good ones! The descriptions of the characters in this book are very vivid. The key is that there are many characters and the descriptions are well-founded. Especially when making suggestions, it feels very immersive.

Why is a crow like a writing desk? I don't need any reason to give you good reviews.