NBA: I'm Just Saying Basketball Skills Are Getting Worse

It's not that basketball skills are regressing, but that the level of confrontation is getting worse There is a saying in the NBA that without confrontation alone, even the center can play tricks, but the confrontation is a mess and he can't even hold the ball It is very unfair to compare players in the 1980s with today's players. When you are playing, you not only have to play, but you also have to be careful about hitting people. When you go to the layup, you have to be careful. Someone pulls you down. When you go to the layup, you have to be careful not only about someone blocking the shot, but also about someone using the hand to block the shot. The hand directly hugs you down Hidden elbows on the outside, pulling the jersey, and pinching are even more commonplace. It is really hard to say how many of these foreign star players can play now

It's all about being better now than before. However, in fact, many of today's techniques cannot be used under the previous rules. Today's dribbling and breakthroughs, in the era when Jordan first came out, one breakthrough was a wrist-turning walk. This thing was not developed until the mid-to-late 90s. It was clearly written in the rules before that the dribbler must stay in the upper half of the basketball. This is one of the reasons why it was difficult for outsiders to be the core in the past, and most of them were inside. Because of this and the handcheck reason, there were few breakthroughs in the past, and persistence It is also difficult to shoot a three-pointer. Allow outside players to put their hands on you. Just find a court and try it yourself. There is no way to pull it up directly when protecting the ball, not to mention the vertical takeoff and other rules of the inside. The NBA has been weakening the influence of the inside in the past few years. Is it just to make the game smoother? The only thing in modern times that is definitely better than before is the average physical fitness of players. At least in terms of tonnage, it must be better than before. Just like the current Curry, if you put him in the 1980s, he would be called a heavy point guard.

The so-called signature moves are all in line with the star's own physical conditions. If you don't have that physical fitness, let Paul check it out and don't label you as SB.

One is forged by hard work and tempered with iron and blood. The other is a person who uses medicine to maintain health. I don't understand why we should fight for nothing.

The most famous one is to learn the dreamy steps from Ah Tan, learn the crab steps and do Yangcheng Lake backwards to make people laugh. But why did Ah Tan learn technology? It wasn't because under the current rules, if he only knew how to break through, he would be flanked to death, so Ah Tan was forced to learn technology. If hand defense had not been canceled at that time, Ah Tan's average points per game would have been five points lower. The all-around All-Star, who averaged 20 points, 5 rebounds and 5 assists per game, would never have reached the threshold of a 30+8+8 superstar. The hand-held defense rule was canceled; then the defensive three-second zone was reset to open up space, making it easier for outside players to break through the defense and get to the basket; then the cylinder rule introduced after Kobe Bryant's three-year finals further weakened the defense, making free throws more likely to occur and making defenders more fearful; after the Spurs' final swan song, Curry came to Curry's five-year general In the finals era, zone defense rules and mobile pick-and-rolls were further blurred. The elevator door tactic was a variant of the mobile pick-and-roll that was tested on the edge of the rules. It was blown to death ten years ago. In the SGA, it was no longer practiced. It directly hooked the league to buy rice and pay money. If Nelson hadn't been a human being in the Knicks finals, otherwise the free throws would have been like that bear of SGA.

People in the comments section kept saying that if players don't do it in the 1980s or 1990s, they will be beaten to death. I laugh every time I see this kind of comment. Is it because today's players are not as good at fighting as before? Can't beat those players wearing canvas shoes and sucking leaves? Nowadays, fights and conflicts are rare. This is because the league has strict control and fines and suspensions are often imposed. It is not because players cannot fight. As for those who say they will be prevented from death by small tricks, they are even more hilarious. No small moves now? Insert eyes, kick in the crotch, step on feet, tear clothes, etc. Are there any small moves now? Today's players are physically better than before, and their finances are better than before. Many players also practice Sanda, boxing, etc. In their spare time. You said they are not as good as the ancient skinny men? The most important thing is that today's players are much smarter than previous players. Even role players can understand tactics and understand the league rules thoroughly. If this group of people had reached the 1980s and 1990s, they would have killed those players who sucked leaves and burned their brains by just using the rules. I don't deny that there were indeed many physically gifted players in the past, such as Malone, Jordan, Chamberlain, O'Neal, etc. But how many such players are there? Now role players rely on more complete training methods to tap their potential. Is it comparable to those people in the past? The real beauty of the NBA started in the 1990s, when the league began to strictly ban the Leafs. Jordan held breakfast training camps to systematically train the body and polish skills at the same time. Many players have participated in his training camps. Those who have participated in his training camp are relatively capable players in the league. Many players later learned from Jordan's training camp system to train their bodies and polish their skills. When the teams later became rich and each team had its own training room, there were few training camps organized by the players themselves. Most of them were retired players asking for life lessons. But what I want to say is that today's players are far superior to previous players in terms of physical fitness and IQ (except for those with extraordinary talents). So the ancient talk is all nonsense. As for post-up singles, this technology has long been outdated. Post-up singles, what is singles? It's just one person holding the ball in the low post and four people watching. This kind of technology that wastes time and physical energy can only be used in the 1990s and 100s. Nowadays, basketball is about efficiency and attacking time. Will there be fewer post-ups now? Durant, Leonard, Booker, Paul George, James, etc. Many players know it, but they rarely use it because the efficiency is too low. Kobe Bryant was top-notch in post-ups, but his efficiency was only 45%-47%. 47% Is the highest in a season, right? So I want to ask, why does ancient times keep playing ancient times? Is it paying for youth?

Some people just watch the game to enjoy the fun, and flaunting their seniority is a waste of time. If I throw you a videotape from the 1990s, you can't even tell me what tactics and moves it is, it's just a mix of past and present, haha

To be precise, it should be that the overall NBA players are indeed better than the previous NBA.

Speaking of confrontation, just look at the figures of previous role players. In the 1980s and 1990s, in addition to star players, there were a lot of people with bones. Could it be said that the role players at that time would be replaced after every game? It's just that the quality of the role players now has improved, and the players can't be crushed like before.

I won't talk about ancient times, but just a few skills can make a fish belly win consecutively? Among them are the SuperSonics and Lakers? Author, I think you are here to embarrass me

It is indeed regressing. The tactical level of basketball is always improving, but technology is directly linked to the confrontation and defensive environment. The more intense the confrontation, the more offensive teams will develop various techniques in order to score goals. In today's age of body hair whistles, it is completely unnecessary.

The superstars of the past are still superstars now, and the role players of the past may not be able to play in the Development League now.

The modern NBA has particularly high requirements for role players, and the quality of modern role players is much higher than that of ancient times. It is difficult for players with a single function to gain a foothold in the NBA today. Today's top role players are 3D players like Caruso who can handle the ball by themselves and have good movement control. However, many role players in ancient times did not dare to shoot open three-pointers. This is the biggest gap between the current NBA and ancient times.

This way of writing can't compare ancient times and modern times. Isn't it just that the one who takes medicine can't beat the one who cheats? If you combine the peak abilities of Durant, Curry, Antetokounmpo, Ah Tan, and Wade, you can also take care of Jordan.

What's so good about the current NBA? It's like King James. He can walk four steps like a crab. If you can't win, change the rules. Cooperate with gambling groups. Isn't this degeneration? Why not watch the World Championships?

The modern era is definitely better than before. The modern understanding of various tactics, movement, and player strength are not comparable to those of the previous era, especially those who always talk about confrontation. Is it true that the muscles that were longer in the past collided with each other than those in the modern era? Or was there something special before? Or are actions that are not basketball also called confrontation?

Buster's brain circuit is really funny. It turns out that the Cavaliers use the draft in the next few years to exchange role players for someone, and someone runs away and the team is scrapped in the next few years, so the Cavaliers suck someone's blood. It turns out that someone has taken up the Cavaliers' salary space so that someone can't find a leg, calling the Cavaliers weak. It turns out that Wade is in his team, so he took a salary cut and came over to ask Wade to hug you. 🤭 It turns out that being driven away because of poor reputation can still be promoted as someone with ambition and choice. I thought no one wanted it 🤭

Isn't it just about giving technology but not physical fitness? 175 Little Thomas Sky Gou try one

Big beard, using body hair to foul, cheating so many free throws, interrupting so many smooth games, it was absolutely impossible in the 80s and 90s

Is there a possibility that many of today's techniques couldn't be used before? The European step counts as walking, and the Samgold counts as a wrist turn.

Not to mention that LeBron James has been speculating all over his career, just take the 411 that Buster guys brag about all day long. What is that? The data is so beautiful, so he must have the most championships, right? No! Ranked first in scoring history, that season must have the most scoring champions, right? Not yet! With such versatile data, he must be averaging the most triple-doubles per game this season, right? Not even once! If you look carefully, after playing for more than 20 years, apart from these data, there really is nothing to show off!

After reading it, the writing is okay, but the understanding of basketball, especially modern professional basketball, is too naive and taken for granted.

This system is very creative, but the difficulty level of the tasks is a bit confusing, and the protagonist's intelligence is a bit low 🙂

If you have watched videos of players showing off their skills in the 1980s, you won't say this. Later games look like players are playing more smoothly, which is based on the premise of relaxed rules. Iverson's butterfly step would have been blown away in the 1990s. Melon's hesitation step, the old rules of walking, not to mention the eight-step crab and the porcelain hand. In the era of the civilian Pistons, no one would complain if they were beaten to blood. After the rules were changed, the little emperor singled out the entire Pistons. The old stars of the past, the league did not give them a chance to show off.

The current tactical system and efficiency are indeed much better than before. But if you compare most of the current players to the past, it doesn't take much to compare them to the 1980s. Why? It's very simple, because the confrontation is not at the same level. If you want to refute it, please go and watch the video of the Bulls playing the Pistons. Let alone now. If you put A Tan, Wade, etc. In 2003, including Curry, Durant, etc. In the 1980s, they will not be able to play because they have been abolished. In the 1980s, you can have nothing but no confrontation. It is not certain whether Wade Curry can complete a game when he meets the Pistons. As for A Tan, I guess he will have to hug Isaiah in one season. Most of the former stars can still play well now as long as they adapt to the rules. This is the biggest difference. The shooting type is okay. Breakthrough types like Wade and Tan are really useless. Are you going to break into the Pistons penalty area? Stop making trouble. If you push Ranbir over, he really dares to open your head 🙂

There is no negative review of Iron Elbow King Malone

This novel is very well written, I can understand it even if I don't know how to play ball.

The new book has set sail, thank you all for your support.

It's a pure old-fashioned story, and the plot is extremely smooth. It's so funny. When an old guy appears, you only need to learn about his past and his interesting stories. One chapter must be one-fifth of the knowledge. You're so stupid before it's even released on the shelves. Is it really okay?

How many champions would there be in the 1990s? Ha ha