A Nobody in the Martial World

Good people deserve to die, right? Author. According to what you said, people who do good deeds should die.

It's obvious that the author didn't write this book to make money 🤭 Play with the literary youth fan

What kind of answer is that? Good people should be held at gunpoint

The protagonist is even more ridiculous. These victims do not distinguish right from wrong. The protagonist does not distinguish right from wrong just to get some money. This kind of story is disguised as a martial arts world. In fact, what is written has nothing to do with the spirit of chivalry. The ideological concept has long been deviated. It is just a replica of the Count of Monte Cristo. In normal life, there are many reasonable people, but the protagonist of this book and these victims are all ignorant and extreme, 🙂

It can be seen from the opening chapter that the characters created by the author all have their own omissions and are not flawless characters. So can I make the following deduction? According to the author's logic, these victims deserve revenge for their loved ones. Regardless of whether Lord Shen is a good person or not, he is the murderer of his relatives, so Lord Shen deserves to die. Then the people who were saved by Master Shen before also have reasons to come to the door. So how will the previous group of people respond? Will they be killed at the neck, or will they defend their lives to the death? If it is to be killed at the neck, then the logic has completed the closed loop. If one person is involved in another person, there may not be a few people left in the world. If you fight to the death to defend your own life, it will become a game no bigger than a fist. If you are more skilled, you will survive, and if you are less skilled, you will die. There is no reason to explain, and the final outcome may be death on the roadside. After all, no one in the book is perfect, and there are always times of negligence. Both of these endings will cause a large number of people to die, and are full of realism. It always feels like the spirit of martial arts is lacking. After all, martial arts is a kind of romantic fantasy, which is about wanting a kind of perfection without reason, strong martial arts, saving people, it is so chic and classy. However, these realism factors added by the author make the novel less martial arts, and the chivalry is not perfect. It always has to choose between dilemmas, but it doesn't look like martial arts anymore. This is just my humble opinion, I hope Haihan will accept it.

It looks a bit disgusting, but maybe some people like it.

In the first chapter, people are not dogs. People have the right to deal with dogs because dogs are not people. According to the logic of the protagonist, after killing Shen, he should commit suicide.

If they don't surrender, kill the hostages and let their families kill the officers and soldiers in revenge. By analogy, as long as you control a few hostages, kill the county magistrate and prefect, and finally kill the emperor to change the dynasty, so easy

That person named Tianyi has been exporting his three views. Let me just say: Pig's feet are paid to kill people! He just kept talking about bullshit heroes who accidentally hurt people and deserved it.

I can't stand it anymore. The world is like this. If I kill the fire-fighting person, will there be any help next time? If the government allows good people to die and have someone to support them in old age, where will these heroes come from? Just for one sentence, those who hold salary for everyone should not be allowed to freeze to death in the wind and snow. This book should be cut

Then according to the author's thinking, I can scold him!

I still can't help but say a few words. According to the author's idea, when a good guy kills a bad guy, he must pay for all the possible consequences of his good deeds. Therefore, the good guy should watch from the side when he sees the bad guy killing people. After the bad guy kills them all, no bad consequences will be produced, and then kills the bad guy. In this way, no one can blame the good guy, and the cause and effect is cut off.

Like others said, why should good people be held at gunpoint? You said that good people have to be responsible for the innocent people who are accidentally injured and killed. Essentially, it means that you are incapable of dealing with evil people, so you express your anger at those who will not hurt you and then move yourself.

The author doesn't understand the readers' preferences. In this environment, if the protagonist adheres to deontology, he will definitely be scolded. The user groups of Qidian are basically rough egoists and utilitarians, and I'm afraid there are more of the former. Your talk about deontology is simply a direct comparison. It's not impossible to say it, but you can't write it like this. You have to write that the protagonist's family was killed by Master Shen, and then Master Shen left fifty taels of silver in front of the protagonist's dead parents and left. Then, when the protagonist killed Master Shen, the people around him tried to dissuade him. Master Shen is a good person. If your parents die, just die. In this way, the comment area will be in a different direction.

The writing is quite good. It describes the sentient beings behind the heroes. Those who were accidentally injured by the heroes have reason to take revenge. After all, it was the heroes who hurt them. No matter what the reason is, whether it is for the common people or for righteousness, the heroes' deaths are not innocent. Saving people and killing people is not a matter of quantity, but the main reason why the heroes died was because they had too much responsibility for the world. If it were Han Li or Fang Yuan, this problem would not have occurred. Ha ha.

The value of this sentence is still rising. This type of hero is right to do justice, but this is not a reason to hurt innocent passers-by. You can say that in troubled times, civilians are worse than dogs, but if they cannot be harmed, they must calm down, be grateful, and shout that heroes have killed well. This is not bad, at least there is some compensation, but that's it, rely on your own strength and spend some money to go private. (For ordinary people, who dares to be fierce in person, are they not afraid of being chopped with a knife?) Then, the hero slays demons and protects the Tao, and gains both fame and fortune. Aren't these innocent people even willing to take revenge? You must know that murder must be punished with life. Some netizens say that when bad people cause harm, look at the author's examples. Which one is the bad person doing harm to? It's just that bad people pass by or stay there, and then passers-by suffer. Some netizens also gave examples, such as Mexico, yes, they do have to run away, but shouldn't revenge be used as a black gun? In the final analysis, it is better to stand and talk without back pain. When you suffer a loss, you may jump higher than anyone else.

The first introduction link at the beginning already involves distorting values. Different people will have different feelings when they see the same work, but the values ​​must be the same.

No one has ever discussed the bones and innocent souls behind the heroes' heroic deeds. They will only praise the heroes for what good things they did today, what evildoers they got rid of, and how they saved the common people. But no one ever paid attention to those NPC-like passers-by in the background. Maybe it was just a casual sword strike from the hero, and the pillar of a family died. He was the husband of his wife, the son of his parents, and the father of his children. He was just working normally that day. Who would have thought that there was a hero fighting with a monster next door, and the hero came over and struck a blow. The sword just struck me to death. Do I deserve to be a small price to pay in this heroic act of justice? I can pay some compensation afterwards and pretend it never happened. There have been so many innocent people who died tragically in all the heroic acts of justice in the world, so that their family members, who are like weeds, are angry. Is it wrong? Just like people in the world, they can't help themselves. No one is right or wrong. If you kill my family, I will kill you. Your family can also come and kill me for revenge. That's all.

The logic is untenable. Killing for money? When you can't even determine what's right or wrong, you have no martial arts skills and it all depends on luck.

The first few chapters are really disgusting to read. If the hero like Shen is killed by the protagonist, but no one comes to kill the protagonist, then it can only be blamed on the good people not being clique-y and ruthless enough. The most disgusting thing is using the compensation money given to you as money to buy your life. What he did is not bullying men and dominating women.

This beginning is very interesting, except for the protagonist The hero's law enforcement efforts and the issues of accountability and follow-up tracking for incidents caused during the law enforcement process. The author gave 4 sets of data, old woman (direct cause of death) brother and sister (indirect cause of death) craftsman (personal disability) woman (accidental death) The heroes are correct in enforcing the law, but the first 2 are incorrect for law enforcement agencies and will be fired. The last 2, one lost his job and the other withdrew money. The opportunity is gone and the situation is not handled properly (compensation is not adequate 😁 It is undeniable that all the members are evil, the protagonist is a pure evil, the other 5 people are both the perpetrators and the victims The hero has serious faults, the civilians are looking for a punching bag without killing themselves, the protagonist is making money by promoting his own ideas

This book you wrote is really disgusting and vicious.

🙂According to the author's intention, people can be kidnapped by morality, and those who feel compassion should be killed and humiliated by little people.

I was a little confused after reading the introduction. What does it mean to be a person who achieves great things and doesn't stick to trivial matters? This sentence is not originally used to describe a knight. A great knight serves the country and the people and draws his sword to help when there is injustice. Therefore, a real knight will not do evil things and has no reason to do evil things (please refer to Lu Zhishen, Guo Jing and Shi Potian). So the question is, who is the revenge story the author wants to write to avenge? Does the author want to include the object of revenge in the group of knights? Since he can do evil things, it means that he is not a true knight, so what the author writes is a simple revenge story, similar to The Count of Monte Cristo, but it actually has nothing to do with the chivalrous spirit of martial arts, right? 🙂

After reading the second volume, the characters are full-bodied. The protagonist is a very rational person, with goals and opinions, and a person who divides many things very clearly. The plot cannot accept the cunning, so don't read it Is the connotation of the book speaking for the few people who have sacrificed for society and organizations

There is no time travel, no halo, no dazzling moves, and disgusting male and female plots. Everything is very ordinary. There is something extraordinary in the ordinary, and the book is very comfortable to read. I haven't felt this way for a long time, and I never post book reviews. The purpose of comments is to hope that the author will see that there are still people who hope that you will finish writing this book and we will want to read it.

This is how people's hearts are, but it's easier to accept it when you see some positive plots. After all, reading is for relaxation rather than for thinking, and I have become accustomed to self-imposed confinement early on. Write whatever the market needs, write whatever you want to see... I have long lost my self-awareness. Brain-numbing and brainwashing Shuangwenshuang dramas are the mainstream. I think the author can charge a fee to prevent you from scolding the cook after eating here. If you want to see it, pay to keep it. If you don't understand it, just let it go.

Now that your protagonist is killing this hero, he says he deserves to be killed if he accidentally kills someone else. Aren't you just getting paid? Why do you want to put yourself in a great and upright position? So that means you should commit suicide when someone whose relatives saved this hero comes to you? When a young man is ill, he will export his self-righteous views. I feel that everyone in the world is drunk and I am sober.

It slipped away and I really couldn't stand it anymore.

It's quite good-looking. It doesn't talk about right and wrong, only about cause and effect. For the grassroots who are seeking survival at the bottom, family and hatred are greater than right and wrong. For example, Zhang Koukou committed a crime, but I think he did the right thing.