The White-Robed Chancellor

This feels right, I still have to draw the cover myself

Starting today, brothers witness

I came in through Qidian Advertising and thought it had 300,000 words. Look carefully, 30 words!

How could Lao Wang not have idioms for Solitaire?

Please give me some advice from all the talented men and women.

Grenade cart wheel talk, Mai Ke tried his wife many times, Lao Wang doesn't know how to fight🤡🤡🤡

Created a cover using GPT

Lao Wang, update quickly! ! !

On September 6, 1915, he wrote a letter to his friend Xiao Zisheng. (Xiao Zisheng (1894-1976), courtesy name Xudong, was a native of Xiangxiang, Hunan. He was a good friend of the teacher when he was studying at Hunan Provincial First Normal School.) In this letter, when the teacher talked to Xiao Zisheng about the relationship between majors and Ph. D. S, and the importance of general knowledge, he put forward his views on Wang Anshi: "Wrong This is bound to fail. For example, Wang Anshi, who wanted to carry out his ideas and rely on ancient times, annotated "Zhou Li" and wrote "Zhuo", and his articles were also proud of the Han and Tang Dynasties. It can be said that there are specialized scholars, but those who fail have no general knowledge and do not fully understand the society, so they implement inappropriate policies. " June 20, 1965. In the morning, I talked with Professors Liu Dajie and Zhou Gucheng of Fudan University. The talk included academic discussions, the history of Chinese literature, modern Peking Opera, educational reform, "Cihai", etc. Regarding academic debates, the teacher said: Don't be afraid of criticism. Only by having criticism can we make progress. It is not that we ask others to criticize you (referring to Zhou Gucheng - editor's note), but that the masses spontaneously criticize you. I criticized you this time, which is good for everyone. For now, you should take your time writing articles. When they stop criticizing you, you can take a good look at their articles and do some research. You should accept what they say is right and do some self-criticism; if you think you can argue with them on some points, you can write an article to argue with them. In the debate on logic issues, I agree with your opinion that dialectics and formal logic should be distinguished, but I do not agree with the argument that the two are confused. Formal logic is about form, that is, the rules about the form of thinking. The teacher told Liu Dajie that he wanted to read his "History of the Development of Chinese Literature" and said that if you publish another book in the future, you must give me a copy. Liu Dajie asked the teacher some questions about literary history. The teacher said: Han Yu's articles in the Tang Dynasty were okay, but they lacked ideological quality. Han Yu's poems are a bit strange. Han Yu's ancient prose has a great influence on later generations, and he should not be underestimated when writing literary history. Liu Zongyuan's article is more ideological than Han Yu's, but it is more difficult to read. Qu Yuan wrote "Tian Wen", and it took a thousand years for Liu Zongyuan to write "Tian Dui", which was very courageous. At best, Liu Zongyuan can be said to have some elements of simple materialism. Liu Yuxi did not write many articles. He wrote three articles on "Lun of Heaven", advocating the theory that "the heaven and man interact with each other to win and use each other." He was against superstition. Liu Yuxi can be said to be a simple materialist. The most valuable thing about Wang Anshi of the Song Dynasty is that he put forward the idea of ​​"people's words are not enough." During the Song Shenzong era, he carried out reforms. At that time, many people attacked him, but he was not afraid. Feudal society was no different than today. Public opinion could kill people, but he could hold on. This was not easy to do. We must learn from Wang Anshi's spirit, not to be afraid of criticism, but to dare to express and stick to our own opinions.

I was attracted by the many Douyin videos promoting books. Those videos criticized the books of Grenade and Mike, and they said this book was good. Anyone who works in business knows that planting grass in advance is intentional. I read it out of curiosity and thought that this book was powerful and well-founded, but it was too unheroic. Where there is oppression, there is compromise on the part of the protagonist. Even if you risk your life as a fellow villager, you must strive to repay the favor to the court. I feel quite uninterested. It's not that the book is boring, it's that the people are boring. How can I still touch Porcelain Grenades and Mike's books? Save it, ah