Greece Rebuilds Rome

There are four point-and-shoot books of the same type, one for independent reading, and three of them are about George's son Constantine, one is about Otto, and one is about George's original character. Many people chose Constantine because they valued being able to write until World War II, but the start time was too late. Greece's foundation was very poor. If they wanted to take more territory in the Balkans, they could only develop in advance and strive to have a foundation that was ahead of Serbia and Bulgaria at the time of the Treaty of Santo Stefano, so as to avoid the Three Kingdoms being unable to eat enough territory and wash away the culture. Otto's problem was that it was too early and there was no suitable time for caponing, so he couldn't do big things. The person who replaced George was the great-grandson of the founding father of Greece and had a certain local background, but letting a grassroots be king is not as good as being a king with aristocratic royal status. Whether other countries and Greeks can recognize him is a question Therefore, it is most appropriate to let George be the protagonist starting in the 1860s. In addition to having enough time to deal with the Russian-Turkish War and the Capon Competition, this is also an era when many countries actively or passively start to change, and Greece can also ride on this wave Read this book The writing is particularly solid, and the reform is advancing steadily. It is at the level of fairy grass. However, some book reviews say that it expands the perspectives of other classes. If the author can see it, he hopes to describe them less when writing about war. The book next door likes to write about war. The new characters occupy a large space. Rather than writing about big-headed soldiers rolling in the mud, it may be more appropriate to advance the battle report In addition, the author's view of the largest territory is the size during the time of Alexios I. I think it is conservative to eat the ground in Asia Minor. There are many Greeks on the Black Sea coastline. Even if they can't eat at first, they can first establish Trabizond's independence and then slowly merge it. The southern coastline mainly competes with Italy. Cilicia belonged to France and Syria according to the partition plan of World War I, and could be taken after Türkiye followed the example of Türkiye in World War II. It's not that the inland cannot be eaten. You can conquer it again after World War I, expel or assimilate the Turks, add Greek immigrants, and develop the inland as a colony. You can't eat it all at once, but you can slowly eat it near Ankara. The above-mentioned development in Minor Asia can broaden the base and weaken the local chickens (rush to the corner to play Three Kingdoms with the Armenians and Kurds)

Which colony is stronger, China and Europe look at Germany The two can take food from the mouths of Britain and France at an absolute starting disadvantage, and can also make each colony have good economic value. Write about a small country in the 19th century that wanted to colonize? Just follow the Germans 1. Cameroon: a large warehouse of iron (3.4 Billion tons) and aluminum (1 billion tons), and other reserves such as nickel, gold, uranium and diamonds are also very considerable. In terms of renewable resources, Cameroon is a producer of various types of high-quality wood, coffee, bananas, and rubber. And it is still an oil-producing country There was no conflict with France or even an armed conflict with the locals. Germany was able to capture this place entirely because in 1884 Bismarck asked the former doctor and then German explorer: Gustav Nachtigal to go to low-cost colonization. In the end, this guy really relied on diplomacy to get the local chief to sign a protection treaty recognizing this as a German protectorate, and then relied on information Chai came up with a treaty to declare a fait accompli at the "Berlin Conference" that carved up Africa in 1884-1885. Since the principle of the "Berlin Conference" at that time was that fait accompli came first, strength came second (it was originally intended to prevent fighting for the colonies, and strength came first, then the conference was meaningless). Moreover, the French, who did not have the consciousness to penetrate West Africa at the time, also suffered this small loss silently. Germany acquired Cameroon for nothing without a large-scale invasion 2. Togo: The main mineral product is 260 million tons of high-quality carbonates (used for fertilizers). Corresponding to the scarce mineral deposits are good agricultural conditions. Nearly 44% of Togo's fertile land area is cultivated land, and the local production of cocoa, coffee and cotton is considerable How did this land come from? Still Gustav Nakhtigar, still not using force but diplomacy, still protecting the country, still 1884, still a fait accompli of the "Berlin Conference" 3. Namibia: This is the opposite of Togo. The western coast and the east are large expanses of desert, and only the central and northern parts can be inhabited. But there are a lot of corresponding minerals, including diamonds, uranium, copper, lead, zinc, and gold. Among them, the diamond reserves rank sixth in the world and the uranium exports are also at the forefront of Africa (due to Namibia's poor geographical environment, many of these mines cannot be mined with the technology of the 19th and 20th centuries). As for how it came about, it was born. This time, a man named Adolf Lüderitz was born in 1883. He fell in love with a small seaport in the western desert of Namibia, and deliberately used the famous "mile" when buying land from the local chief. Vs geographical miles" information gap made the chief believe that he only sold one port but in fact the country was sold in the treaty. Later, Germany declared a protectorate and then the "Berlin Conference" 4. Tanzania: The highlight is coming. Non-renewable resources have more than 200,000 tons of proven reserves of uranium ore, more than 2 billion tons of coal, and a large amount of nickel, iron ore (130 million tons of proven reserves), copper, graphite, lithium, rare earths and other minerals. There is also gold, diamonds, sapphires, emeralds and the unique tanzanite, oil-producing country. In terms of renewable resources, it relies on the resources of large lakes such as Lake Victoria, Lake Tanganyika and Lake Malawi, as well as good agricultural conditions under the nourishment of a large number of rivers, as well as a large amount of forestry resources. So how did Germany obtain this Feng Shui treasure land? An ultra-nationalist: Carl Peters went to the interior of Tanzania in 1884 and tricked local chiefs into signing a bunch of messy treaties. Then the German government directly announced the treaty to take effect and declared a colony in the Zanzibar Sultanate. Later, the British came over and said: "You can't do this." Then Germany assigned Uganda and Kenya from this land to the British. In the end, the matter was resolved. The originally huge and loose Sultanate of Zanzibar had only a section of coastline left without a fight, and Tanzania directly swallowed it later This is why I recommend that all small and weak countries in the 19th century break the situation and study German literature. However, the case of Germany's low-cost and high-return colonization is worthy of study by novel authors. It is always reasonable to spend some diplomatic resources to grab one of the four before the Berlin Conference What if it is too weak to grab Germany? 5. Democratic Republic of the Congo: Non-renewable/renewable resources: Please enter text No matter how weak you are, you can't even beat Belgium, right? If you are stronger than Belgium, then you will definitely be able to cut off one of the four German colonies in advance. If you are weaker than Belgium, then you will most likely be able to replace Leopold II and come to the Congo This is the parallel world in the book by the authors. No matter how you squeeze the Cyber ​​Congolese, you will accumulate merit. In the cyber world, helping the Cyber ​​Congolese get rid of Cyber ​​Leopold II will also accumulate cyber merit.

So don't ask where Greece will eat.

I don't know anything about Greece. But the author's research makes me believe that what he said is true. Every important person, every local mineral deposit, travel map, or policy has a chart. In this regard, it is better than many authors. The disadvantage is that Greece is too biased and I have no impression of it at all. I have never played Crusader Kings and it is very unfamiliar to me. There are no other major problems. 🙂🙂

Because the protagonist needs to marry the British princess Louise, many book friends think Louise is not good-looking. But divorce is impossible. Difficult labor cannot be difficult. In order to prevent the protagonist from being too miserable, the author asked Louise to add a good-looking female partner as a lover to the protagonist. (This made perfect sense in the late 19th century) Just to clarify. Remarks: The heroine of this book, the protagonist's queen, Princess Louise (Louise Caroline) Official setting by the author Historical photos The reason why the characters are getting better and better is because the early photography technology was very poor. Female 2 Aspasia in this book (Greek Fanar noble, the protagonist's female officer, confidant and lover) Official setting by the author

Ports did not create wealth in the early days. Their core is how many inland areas they can connect to. For example, the success of Shanghai and New York is inseparable from the Yangtze River and Great Lakes water systems behind them. The upper and lower limits of a port depend on what it connects to. There are many ways to develop ports, but the cheapest and most effective is transshipment-capital. Accumulation-industrial accumulation-becoming an economic center is the road to success for Shanghai and New York Athens and Rome are typical examples of the country's efforts to pile up industries. It's not impossible, but it just can't support the second one Thessaloniki and Smyrna can be seen as success and failure cases, and the Balkan regime Lin Liguan Taxes and geographical risks directly destroyed the possibility of Thessaloniki becoming a world-class port. The reason why the entire metropolitan area has less than one million people so far is that the wealth of the Balkans refuses to be concentrated out to sea from here. After the founding of Turkey, Smyrna has extremely well connected the wealth of the entire western and central Turkey. The entire metropolitan area has successfully developed to Level 4 million So if you want to develop Thessaloniki's future diplomacy, it is essential. It is unreasonable for Asia to just eat along the coast Because in this case, the turbulent inland cannot provide an economic hinterland for the coast. It is said that the eastern coastal provinces are rich, but without the inland, can the eastern coastal provinces develop as they are today? If there is no chaos, the trapped Turks will start to challenge Greece's maritime hegemony again and eat a circle along the coastline = lack of strategic depth and population

The Mediterranean in 1864 Protagonist•King George I of Greece Greek Palace Canaris Kumunduros Deligiogis Rufus Vulgaris Ai-generated schematic of Palikal in traditional Greek clothing

Greece's "Great Ideal"

The author's Greece is probably as big as it should be. Anatolia can't even take it all. Ankara in the east is enough. At most, southern Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Albania can be added to the north.

If Greece wants to solve the fertility problem, to put it bluntly, it must ensure that men can tie up their partners. Otherwise, the more they talk about women's freedom, it will just become women selling indulgences to men.

Some exquisite maps of Greece Topographic maps of Greece Scenic spots and people in Greece

I originally wanted to do it for free, but this book is worth subscribing to. It has detailed data but is not boring, and it is logical and not stupid.

The situation in Greece before the population exchange

It's been a long time since I've seen a historical novel with real data and reasonable deductions. It's not like a small and weak country suddenly industrialized rapidly with a wave of its hand, punched Britain and kicked Germany, and became number one in the world in a few years. That's just ridiculous. If Europe wanted to expand its territory in the 19th and 20th centuries, it had to consider geopolitics, economic strength, military strength and, most importantly, timing, otherwise it would not develop at all. The author also buried clues earlier. He carried out military reforms according to the German army, and also planned to take advantage of the impending defeat of France in September 1970 to take advantage of Napoleon III? Then he used his influence to import rifle production lines from France to strengthen military logistics capabilities, so the strength of the army should be greatly improved. Regulating stock exchanges and setting up circuit breaker mechanisms are intended to seize the opportunity to take advantage of the sluggish economic development of European countries under the background of the economic crisis that began in 1973 for several consecutive years, attract foreign investment as much as possible, and take advantage of the opportunity of the second industrial revolution in the 1970s to accelerate the take-off of the industrialized economy. However, Greece is now a small country with limited resources. It should not be possible to develop a full industrial system. I feel that it should develop a few key developments in the major categories of mining and processing, electricity, machinery, steel, ships, and military industries. (There are too many technologies and subdivisions in machinery, steel, ships, etc. It is probably unrealistic for Greece to develop a complete set of independent industrial systems due to lack of resources.) Then it should be enough to develop light industries such as textiles and food (mainly developing high-end wine) that protect the national economy and people's livelihood. After the military and economic development, coupled with the Bulgarian diocese and the Greek language issues that were foreshadowed earlier, we should be able to seize the opportunity to regain Albania, Macedonia, southern Bulgaria and other regions in the Balkan Peninsula when the Tenth Russo-Turkish War in 1977 is reached. The territory will be able to expand to more than 200,000 people 🙂 and the population will grow to six to seven million. It should be no problem. You can even conduct additional deductions, fight the historical Greek-Turkish war in the 1980s in a different way, and regain a few islands, and then you can continue to develop your country's military, industry, economy, science and technology, and education with peace of mind. When World War I breaks out, Ze's strength will be stronger than Italy's in history, and it will be considered a regional power in the Eastern Mediterranean (referring to economy, industry, military strength, diplomatic influence, etc.). By then, it will take over the castle and the coast of the Asia Minor Peninsula in one fell swoop, and drive Turkey into the interior. At this time, there should be more than 500,000 people at the level? Coupled with the division of Turkey by the great powers such as Britain and France after World War I, Türkiye completely lost its access to the sea and could never threaten Greece. Then according to the author's intention, plus the compensation from Britain and France, the oil-bearing area in eastern Libya will be allocated to Greece as compensation to prevent Greece from further invading the interior areas of Asia Minor? In this way, Greece can be completely made great again. The area will be larger than the great ideals of Greece. It will completely become a regional power along the Eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea, turning the Aegean Sea into an inland sea 🙂. If it develops well, it should be able to have the strength of the great powers before World War II (referring to the European mainland, excluding the major colonies of the great powers). It is simply unrealistic to want to be the number one in the world, or the top three in the world. By then, it will be able to become a regional power with a developed economy. As a country guarding the Eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, so close to Suez, and located at the crossroads of Eurasia, it will be great to become a regional power with certain influence and voice in Asia, Africa and Europe.

Suddenly I realized that if this world line reaches modern times, Greece will become the only country spanning the three continents of Asia, Europe and Africa.

I ordered three books about modern Greece in Qidian. The level of this book is more than one level higher than the others.

The writing is quite good, but it's a pity that modern Greece's start was too unpopular.

It is convenient for a small country to implement policies. In this small country, with a population of a few million, it is equivalent to the size of an ordinary third-tier city in the country. If it is other larger countries with a population of tens of millions, they will not see results for several years without reform. So if you feel that the policy is being implemented very quickly, that's normal. With a population of about two million, the government is all our own, and nationalism is prevalent, can you be unhappy?

I feel that those who like to watch farming or business types will like to read it. I feel that there is a lot of useful information, and the latest chapters are basically not informative.

I can't help it, I feel like my plot has fast forwarded to the time when the world mourned the death of George and the flags were flown at half-mast. By the way, this book is really good. Unfortunately, I forgot to vote for the monthly ticket last month and it has expired. The main reason is that Qidian's expiration reminder for foreign regions is strange. The actual deadline is based on domestic ones.

A rare perspective of the struggle of a small country. Although I only know Otto when playing v3, I don't know much about George behind him. I only know the deeds of the Monkey King. But the author introduced the characters very well, and also wrote about the feeling that the expansion of a small country is not only its own business, but also a chessboard for the game of big countries. In reality, it is a pity that Greece failed to win the castle. I originally sympathized with Greece, which has a long history but is quite similar to the Han people, and its tragic modern experience. I hope that the Greeks in the author's writings will be as mixed as possible 😊

The most detailed book on the development of small countries written by Diplomacy Tengnuo, which is more realistic and logical.

Gradual Decline of the Greeks

What does the author think was the Greek population in that territory in 1925? What proportion? I think if Greece had a population of 20 million, World War II could have eaten the Kosovo region of Bulgaria and Serbia, or the territory of Romania on the Black Sea.

The Danube Front begins in 999 when Rome was founded. It reveals the origins of the crisis in the third century from various perspectives, builds the future Queen of the Cities, determines the political pattern of the empire for the next thousand years, and shapes a new common identity (there are too few foreign historical resources, so I will take a place to advertise, sincerely thank you, and wish the author an early ascension to the throne 🌹🌹🌹)

It's quite good-looking. I finally saw a normal Greek text. It's not like the one next door where Yuri's reincarnation and King Otto's mind took possession of the Balkans.

With the land and population of Greece, I don't know if some high-level talents can be produced by the end of the century. Although education has kept up, the population base is too small, and the probability of SSR is not high. However, it does not rule out the author's divine power. Greece's destiny is to produce some local bosses. Whether it is military, technology, or administration, Greece is too short of talents. However, with the protagonist's prophecy and general direction, plus the Greek culture, the scientific and technological route will not go astray. Those high-level talents in history are also very important. It depends on whether they can be retained if they are given enough.

As shown in the picture

The writing is very good! But I skipped dozens of chapters and saw that there was no violation at all! And there's nothing cool about it! Something! Just like a biography! Either squirt or express your feelings.

Most modern foreign novels do not handle China well. According to normal logic, it is normal to beat up the drowned dog, but no one dares to write like this, not even to change history. Or just ignore it completely, as if this country doesn't exist. The most disgusting thing is white skin and yellow heart. A white person kneels down to lick or make friends with a yellow person. This kind of thing is really unbearable. Author, what you wrote is that Greece is a small country with a population of just a few million, and it may not be self-sufficient in food. Moreover, that era was the era of nationalism, and nationalism in Greece was even stronger. The Balkans were just a powder keg, and I felt that it could not become a big country. It did not have the foundation. I have seen a book called "Dream of Magna Graecia" in other software. This one directly started a fight with the Soviet Union, acting as the vanguard of the United States, and then built it like a lighthouse in the Balkans, becoming a small overlord of the Balkans. After thinking about it, Greece cannot become a big country like that, or Europe and the United States will not allow Greece to dominate there, unless it is reckless, and it is not a country with a solid foundation like Britain, France, Germany and Austria. I would like to ask the author, what is your treatment of China and the yellow race