Rich? Rheinmetall. Poor? Rheinmetall!

After reading more than a hundred chapters, I really can't stand it anymore. It has the same problem as a novel of the same type that I read before. They all started out in the military industry, but they want to develop hundreds of industrial categories in China, both military and civilian. Today's China has tens of millions of companies and factories for the entire industrial chain. As far as the author is concerned, one company and one factory can do it all. This is a typical example of greed for big things and seeking perfection, selling both missiles and mobile phones. I want to see you selling mobile phones, refrigerators and color TVs, while some other authors write about private companies. Take a look at Norinco, China's largest weapons manufacturer. Does it sell mobile phones, cars, and color TVs? I came to see you to see you sell missiles, not to see how you take over Xiaomi, Huawei and Gree. I am really speechless. Even if you say that you want to develop an electronic countermeasures jamming system, I would be very happy, but if you go and say that you want to develop a computer and mobile operating system, I don't know how to complain.

About the moon landing fraud. What do you say about this thing? If you want to praise the United States, you'd better pray that this thing is fake. If you want to harm the United States, you'd better pray that this thing is true. Because whether it's true or false, he can't get in now. 🙄 You have to say this thing is fake. You still have someplace to blow. It is said that the United States was so wise and powerful back then. It deceived the Soviet Union with a fake Apollo project and deceived it into oblivion. Its intelligence capabilities were like those of a fairy flying in the sky. If you want to say this thing is true, it would be even more embarrassing, because you can't get on now. Your glory back then can only serve as a foil to your current abjection. Talent gaps and skills are lost.

The author's latest updated three chapters talk about the moon landing, so I'll talk about it too. First point, the author said that there is no delay in the lunar live broadcast signal. First of all, the delay between the earth and the moon is about 6-7 seconds. The delay-free call videos on the Internet are all edited. It is recommended to watch the uncut live video of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Here we mainly talk about the live broadcast on the 11th. The live broadcast signal on the 11th cannot be directly connected to the American radio and television signal. The solution is to convert the No. 11 Live broadcast signal into a TV signal through specific equipment for broadcast, and then use a video recorder on the ground to start the live broadcast on the TV. The second point is that the orbital data from the earth to the moon to the return are all calculated. The third point is that in order to reduce the weight of the Apollo lunar module, the outer shell was made of aluminum and lead plates. The fourth point is that the lunar rover battery uses a silver-zinc battery, which has a higher capacity than other batteries of the same volume. Fifth point, calculated based on the longest mission time of Apollo 17, from launch - entering orbit - accelerating Hohmann transfer - decelerating into lunar orbit - separation - descent - landing - EVA mission - lunar surface takeoff - docking - return, the entire process lasted 7-8 days. The transfer and return took about 5 days, and the lunar surface was active for 3 days (the moon has gravity), and there was basically no impact on bone density and muscles. Unless you stay in space for more than a month, there will be no impact. (In order to eliminate this effect, there are sports equipment in the space station, and astronauts will exercise regularly.) In summary, I subscribed in vain again, and I was fed a big mouthful while reading. Don't even think about it. All the major space powers have not denied it, but you can see some experts' opinions being flaunted. Also, in the space race between the United States and the Soviet Union in the world, if the United States is really cheating, will the Soviet Union tolerate it?

287 When I see the protagonist personally doing the minion mission, I immediately go 88. Damn, I don't understand why you authors like to feed 💩 to screen readers. That's awesome.

I have read a book before that has almost the same first chapter as this one. But that one seemed to have started in the 1980s, and it was also forced to be sensational, so that one was criticized badly. 🤭

After reading more than 300 chapters, there are some words that I really feel uncomfortable saying. When the protagonist is fine, just stick to his face, his nose, and his butthole. Well, I'll just think of it as setting up a character for the protagonist. When a bunch of Arab guys come up, they just say: There is an old saying in China%&@*, well I will just pretend that they all came to China to study. American generals, British bosses, and foreigners all over the world have all started idioms one by one. There is an old saying in China and an old saying in the East. I really don't know how to evaluate it. Then I read about the beginning of chapter 300. The protagonist saw that the information written for foreigners used a bunch of ancient idioms and was very angry. He asked them to rewrite it, because foreigners knew nothing about idioms. A few chapters later, I saw an American general educating his son. There is an old Chinese saying... It doesn't mean anything but a drama, just like watching a Tang and Song Dynasty costume drama, where the actors recite Shakespeare. After performing a part, I still have to touch my buttocks...

I can't watch it without a brain, and I can't watch it even more with a brain. The plots are inconsistent. One moment it's five yuan, another moment it's ten cents, one moment it's all potatoes, the next it's all meat, it's all nonsense.

No matter how noisy it is, given the fact that the United States currently does not have the capability to land a man on the moon. There is no irrefutable proof that the United States ever landed on the moon, or vice versa. Those who believe that the U. S. Moon landing is a fact and ridicule conspiracy theories attack the character of a scientific issue without providing rigorous proof. You don't think you are very scientifically literate, do you? But on the other hand, anyone who currently questions the U. S. Moon landing cannot produce any evidence to prove that the U. S. Moon landing was a lie. If the United States makes false claims, how many top scientists at NASA will leave holes for you? Pictures, communications, flags, traces of the moon landing... All doubts have reasonable explanations, but these are just explanations, not ironclad evidence. If we discuss the U. S. Moon landing in private, I will say that there is a high probability that 99% of the time we went there. But in public, I will say that the American moon landing was a hoax. The Soviet Union has only been gone for a long time, and it is the US military that rushed into Berlin 🙂 The United States has lost its ability to land on the moon for so long, so don't blame us for questioning. This issue has nothing to do with scientific literacy, it is a matter of stance. That is, whether the credibility and strength of the United States are enough for us to believe that it did indeed land on the moon. Both are being lost, so don't blame the devils at home and abroad in the United States. What? Do you think our country's scientists believe that too? They also believed in the steel parameters of the United States 😐 As the backbone of the country, it is much better for them to believe in the strength of the enemy than not to believe in the strength of the enemy. But we, a group of spectators, can say whatever it is interesting to say. Anyway, the United States has no irrefutable proof of the moon landing.

I can't stand it anymore when I see you taking people to Afghanistan. You are an industrial writer and you actually let the protagonist go to the front line and fight with terrorists. I really can't complain.

I couldn't stand it when I saw the protagonist going to Afghanistan. The author underestimated the wisdom of the country and even the protagonist he created. How could three or five people go to that place under such circumstances.