Neither Clear Nor Unclear

I really want to complain about this name. I'm not sure, so are you writing about the Ming Dynasty or the Qing Dynasty? History is not a mess. Adaptation cannot be random. And this cover is really disturbing. An emperor with the face of a Manchu Manchu and wearing a dragon robe. Wearing a Qing Dynasty hat on his head. You can choose this picture. It's also well-intentioned.

What the hell are you writing? It's all nonsense you're talking to yourself.

You are just the successor of the prince's dynasty, and your legitimacy comes from your bloodline. No matter how bad my father is, he can't kill his father. Otherwise, your most basic legitimacy will be indifferent, and the courtiers will depose you in the name of the Queen Mother, and it will only take a few words to choose a new emperor.

I've read more than 10 chapters, and it's so serious that it contains private information. It's just for the sake of being flat. If you don't like it so much, you can write about the Qing Dynasty as Qianlong 😂

This book wears the skin of the Ming Dynasty and writes about braided drama

Looking back on previous novels, the author should not be Han Chinese

This author is always like this, blindly calling what he thinks is true. I have reviewed the zombie movie before. This time I will talk about what the author thinks is the Ming Dynasty. In his opinion, Zhu Yuanzhang did not resist but only fought among himself. So, let me ask you, why did the Yuan Dynasty waste so much effort and enter the Central Plains, and then it was because of internal strife? Feeling bad and then retreating to the grassland? Then why did the Hu regimes in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period of the Qing Dynasty still fight against each other until the emperor no longer had any power? A Central Plains regime that has been stable for ten years would definitely not be able to go back and continue to be nomadic without external pressure. Normally speaking, who would want to go back and rely on the sky to make a living? Unless there is no room for him at the original dining table. Let's talk about Zhu Yuanzhang's killing of heroes. Let's take a closer look at the period when he killed heroes. It was after the death of the prince Zhu Biao. The emperor's grandson Zhu Yunwen whom he supported had an unfair reputation. Zhu Yunwen paved the way, and the reason why he chose Zhu Yunwen was just because Zhu Yunwen could act, and he cried the worst when Zhu Biao died. So at that time, Zhu Yuanzhang was an old man who died first of his wife and then of his son. Needless to say, his mental state at this time, so I said he killed out of desperation, not planned. Then let's talk about the operations of the Ming Dynasty emperor. Isn't this what the struggle for imperial power is like? Then you put it this way, the entire Song Dynasty was a conspiracy theory, the entire Han Dynasty was a dynasty of cultivating immortals, the entire Qing Dynasty was a feast of Buddhism (Qianlong was upright when playing esotericism), and then let alone the Tang Dynasty.

I feel that the author has a mentality of standing on his father's shoulders and looking down on his grandfather. He always looks down on the ancients with the superiority of modern people, but ignores that his own achievements are the accumulated achievements of his ancestors over time. From a vertical perspective, you are indeed better than the ancestors of the Ming Dynasty. From a horizontal perspective, are you really better than the ancestors of the Ming Dynasty? For example, Mingzu's per capita income was one-half that of Europeans at the same time. What is your income today?

The most unacceptable plot of patricide is simply toxic and insane.

I just read a few chapters, and there are a lot of comments in the comments saying that the author has some personal information. I don't know what they are complaining about. The Zhu Yuanzhang written by the author is the Zhu Yuanzhang in the author's own cognition. What's the problem? And to be fair, aren't cruelty, violence, protection against shortcomings, etc. All the labels of Lao Zhu? He killed corrupt officials, so he is righteous? So just ignore his dark side? Compared with the actions of the heroes and corrupt officials and his perverted sons, I really can't tell who harmed the people more. If Lao Zhu really loves the people, shouldn't he control his own family first? But what did he do? How many sons have you killed? Will he take care of it if it doesn't cause anger among humans and gods? How could his perverted sons be so perverted? It's not because of his family education. We modern people all know that the problems a child exhibits are most likely caused by the family of origin. The problems displayed by the child are largely a reflection of the parents themselves, so it is conceivable how Zhu Yuanzhang himself viewed the common people and people whose status was lower than his own. He has been the emperor for so many years, and he has always practiced a principle, which is "I have suffered all the sufferings of my old Zhu family. From then on, my Zhu family has always wanted to be a master. Anyone who hinders my family from being a master, I will chop off anyone." Go read the history books. When did Zhu Yuanzhang deviate from this line?