What Do You Mean, a Supervillain?

Let me mark it first. I don't see the flavor of cyberpunk, but it does have the flavor of a light novel. When it comes to writing about female supporting characters, the concentration is beyond the standard, and there is also the role of a nanny. Apart from these, it is still readable. I can barely look forward to the follow-up development.

The villain is set up to do a decent job, and is the protagonist at the beginning of the final battle. However, most of the female protagonists are eunuchs. The scenes are very complicated, and it smells like a light novel. It doesn't feel good to do anything. I don't know how to describe the frustration? Pretentious? Keep it up and look at it again if you don't have to watch it later.

Sure enough, even a book in the name of a villain must reflect the hero's majesty and righteousness, and deliberately arranged for an inhumane real villain to trample on it.

Distribution, resources, ecological niche, organizational form. I don't know anyone who can get rid of the vulgar taste and educate everyone about it. The form of social organization in the context of interstellar colonization? It's not like fighting for profits like monkeys fighting. Is it like a battle between gods, where fierce generals challenge each other? There is a saying that I have always agreed with. From the earth age to the interstellar age, the organizational form has not changed much. Whether it is feudalism, slaves, capital. They are just different distribution methods based on the weight of each component element. There is not much of a difference in nature, there is still exploitation and class. I am not an angry youth here, nor am I defending anything. Just pointing out some facts. Not talking about humans, in any ecological environment, competition among multiple species and populations will lead to resource allocation problems. Any species in an environment with limited resources must concentrate resources to allow the population to take advantage. Avoid being eliminated in multi-population competition, and eliminate those that evolve slowly and cannot keep up with environment version updates. In order not to be eliminated and to prevent all individuals from being reduced to food, dominant individuals are needed to verify the direction of evolution. This verification process requires continuous investment of costs and resources, and may not necessarily be consistent with version updates or keep up with the evolution speed of other species. If you want to increase your success rate, you need to take on multiple projects at the same time and invest in multiple routes at the same time. The lower the ecological niche, the more limited resources must be concentrated to ensure the speed of evolution and the degree of alienation. Strengthen risks and improve profitability. At the same time, when a single species takes an absolute advantage, it will differentiate itself into different ecological niches in the population to ensure competition and evolutionary pressure. Even if there is no capital, no money, there is no so-called exploitation. There will also be other evolved resource allocation mechanisms within the population to implement this goal. This is even more obvious for animals that live in groups. Because the sample is easier to observe. The artificial class concept is nothing more than the fact that humans are too strong and after wiping out many species, the missing ecological niches are replenished by the groups that humans have differentiated themselves from. I am explaining an idea here, just a hypothesis. Humans have eaten all large-scale farm species to extinction, leaving no meat to eat. What if there is a branch of humans with low intelligence, fast growth, easy reproduction, and reproductive isolation from humans. They are said to be human but have not been recognized by law and politics, and have no labor value. Just one branch of humanity. Why can't you eat it? Whether it's a monkey fight or a genocide battle between ant populations. Is there a big difference? What is the difference between humans and aliens, and a life-and-death battle between two different genes? Evolution? Purely cold-blooded animals? Nausea? You enjoy the hotbed where our ancestors exterminated all large carnivores that posed a threat to humans, and gave birth to the most primitive and destructive moral values ​​used to restrain humans. You want to use that kind of humanity to refute the bloody facts. Sorry, you may not even realize it. Human nature, or the concept that humans are born above all other species, is itself intended to make eating meat more stress-free. So what is the difference between you and the so-called superior God? The ultimate evolutionary creature in the earth's ecosystem, the most powerful destruction machine, is this all? So enlightened? Remind me again, why do we start to use human nature or morality to restrict human hunting journeys? Of course it's because there's not enough food to eat, and we humans are the only ones left to compete with each other. So there must be a bottom line, and we must protect those who fail in the competition from being completely desperate and avoid a situation where the fish is dead and the net is broken. Haha, come on, aliens👽, humans need new prey. The hunter's spear is almost rotten.

After looking at dozens of pictures, I think the protagonist will not be allowed to embark on the road of stars later. After all, it would be too bad for a giant company not to open branches on other planets.

I don't understand why such a wonderful plot is not popular.

I'm actually quite curious about what kind of game can kill the final boss at the beginning, which is almost like killing a dog. From the boss's point of view, the protagonist is either a Xiaoqiang who cannot be killed, or a rat in the sewer that cannot be caught. In other words, there is not enough attention in the early stage, and it is too late to pay attention in the later stage. But now you are a boss who is like a reborn boss. After knowing the protagonist, you actually let others develop, and you still have no power and can't take action. I am very curious that others are riding on your face, rushing into the company to snatch people, and you told me that you can't send men to arrest you. Are you not trying to force yourself? I don't see what a boss should be like at all. He just keeps being frustrated all the way. This way of writing is better than writing a good-for-nothing protagonist who is scorned by his family and then climbs up the ladder step by step. At least it doesn't look so frustrating.

Fans to the novel! Otherwise, you can only read it if you follow the author's ideas! And this book inherits the usual shortcomings of Internet writers! You can obviously be a chess player, but you have to be a chess piece! Things that can be accomplished by sitting on the dragon's throne, you have to be a soldier in person! If those people in the Kingdom of God wanted to kill you, you would be dead long ago! Purely relying on the author's cheating to survive!

As shown

As shown