A Nineteenth-Century Guide to Medicine

Sigh, the writing is excellent, and the science explanation is very engaging... But as a story, there are still a few things I just have to say... The most important point is, how many supporting characters are there in this book? As a protagonist with an overpowered personality, becoming famous was only a matter of time. Did he really need that much fame?

The Lady with the Lamp & Little Army Headquarters – Florence Nightingale Florence Nightingale was born in 1820 and died in 1910. She was first and foremost a wealthy heiress, and then a brilliant mathematician and statistician who holds an extremely important place in the history of applied statistics.

I saw some readers asking about the female lead in the comments section, so I'll provide a unified response and explanation here: @reader, because the comment section (I think) only allows 150 characters per reply, I created a separate thread for this. First of all, this book definitely does not have a female lead. Why? This issue actually involves several aspects:

I absolutely, positively love the author's inclusion of the national treasure storyline. : D Some people say that there's no need to open one; focusing on popularizing medical science is enough. Some people said that it's okay to open it, but only in a side story, otherwise they feel it would affect the main plot and that the national treasure is of little use to the authorities, so penicillin…

Chapters 28-32 contained spy/agent plot points because the author had a mental breakdown while working at the makeshift hospital. This storyline was subsequently cut. The author admits it's his fault, and Mick will only be a plot device from now on. However, if you really can't accept this plot, please don't read it. You can drop the story, and you can criticize it in the chapters, but please don't use the comments section. This is hereby corrected.

This is just a personal suggestion, which I've already posted in the article, but I'm worried it might get deleted because I pointed out a problem, so I'm posting it here again. I think the article is very well written. As for the spy storyline that people criticized... I'd like to offer a personal opinion: as long as the subplots are well-written and connect well with the main plot, that's fine.

The writing style is clearly a translated work, making it awkward and uncomfortable to read, unsuitable for online writing. It hurts both the eyes and the brain. It might be okay if it were written for oneself or a small group, but it wouldn't attract many readers; it's too highbrow and doesn't appeal to a wide audience. However, the quality of the writing is undeniable; it's acceptable.

There are some problematic plot points in the early part of the story, specifically in chapters 28-32, mainly involving murder, but these are resolved after 10,000 words. If you find them offensive, you can skip them without affecting the main plot; they're basically not mentioned again later.

I'd like to recommend a game! It's also related to medieval medicine, similar in theme to this book. The game is called "The Divine Healer." As the title suggests, you can choose to be a traditional "divine healer" or embrace new medicine to become a true divine healer.

The title of this book reminds me of the great Dr. Lister. That's right, it's the doctor who's well-known in the country for his 300% mortality rate. However, in real history, Liszt was such a person: He clashed with the Royal College of Physicians of London over a patient and deeply resented his colleagues' unconventional behavior (yes, doctors were incredibly wild back then).