I Heard I’m a Tomb Raider

If this book becomes popular in the future, tell me and I will broadcast the lighter electric bird

If there were no eunuchs in this book, I would call you daddy live. No one saw it anyway.

I have never been to prison, but I believe in the people's police. What is this book about? What is written is a complete inference of guilt. Although it is a coincidence, the police will not think in multiple directions. They will just focus on the inference that the protagonist is a criminal to kill the protagonist indefinitely. I am thinking that the tomb has been stolen. What about the surrounding surveillance? Aren't you going to investigate? Just staring at the protagonist, right? This kind of article is completely from the author's own arrangement, and I feel absolutely terrible about the author's arrangement.

In fact, if there is no solid evidence at all, the protagonist cannot be imprisoned for so long, and he will be released in one day at most. After all, he is not an ordinary citizen, but a well-known and influential public figure. If it gets too big, it won't have a good impact, unless someone takes the opportunity to be the protagonist. After all, if you are detained for too long, there will be no evidence of guilt in the end. Many people from top to bottom of the prosecution will be implicated and punished. So in reality, some people are detained for a long time like the protagonist, and there is no evidence to convict them. Then the official might be pinned down inside with his hands. Neither judge nor release.

I saw Chapter 153, and there are still more than 60 chapters left. I think it is quite poisonous. Although it is just a poisonous point, it is still poisonous, but the writing is not bad. In other words, is there any problem with the protagonist telling others that he has traveled through time? Could the situation be worse than it is now? Just show off your space ability, give me a big return pill to study, and treat you as a treasure sooner. And it's really hard for me to accept the setting of concreteness. It's very rigid, but I can understand it. The whole book is written around the premise that the tomb robber cannot be falsified, so this identity must be constantly added. But if the system does not restrict you from speaking out, this thing can be falsified. This is the biggest poisonous point. You might as well write about the system from the beginning. You can't speak out, but I can accept it a little bit. This way of writing greatly limits the development of the subsequent plot, because this provable proposition, that is, he is not a tomb robber, must remain unproven, which will cause conflicts between the protagonist and the relevant levels, making the protagonist distrust them. Then, in order to maintain this situation in the following plots, the atmosphere will become increasingly bad, which can only be said to be one poisonous point after another. Next, let's talk about the issues of the captains. Someone said in the chapter review that their behavior was bad. I can only say that it is against the rules, but it is understandable. From their perspective, a man who has done many evil things is standing in front of them, but he cannot be convicted. Are they just watching him run away? Although it is the author's method to enhance the conflict between the protagonist and xx, the character description is also interesting, which is the main reason why I can read it. Back to the topic, it is a good thing to do things according to the rules, and it is a bad thing to do things absolutely according to the rules. Recall the so-called self-defense in public that the protagonist has done. He is undoubtedly innocent when he acts according to the rules, but his method can be copied. Others use similar means to cause the same effect, but his target is indeed an innocent person. So, is the self-defense in this case considered self-defense? Some people say it's very simple, just find the truth, but follow the rules. As long as he does everything flawlessly, you can't investigate him. So people always need a fearless spirit to seek the truth. From God's perspective, the reader feels that the protagonist is unjust and wronged, but this is a risk he should take. It is appropriate not to reveal the truth and to bear doubts. Life will not let you take advantage of all the good things. Having done so many dangerous things, if I were the person involved, I might have thought of killing him with a single shot from a sniper rifle from 2,000 meters away. Master Mei, a popular online novelist, famous fighter, and arranger, unfortunately fell into the water and died yesterday. Let us deeply remember him.

I think this book is at risk of being cut. As far as the current update status is concerned, the story is basically finished. There is only one big fight left, and I have been procrastinating to write the criminal investigation case. The author wants to give me a golden finger but is afraid that the writing will collapse, so I have been pressing on and writing along until now. If Goldfinger breaks out, it will probably be changed to fantasy and immortality, and it will have nothing to do with the title of the book?

I'm not saying that the author's writing and story are definitely at the top level from the starting point. But we can't mess around like this. When I first started writing, I had to update it at least once a day, right? Stop updating after less than 10 chapters? Who dares to see this? I couldn't get enough of the last book I read.

It's amazing. I almost forgot about it. I thought I was a eunuch. Unexpectedly, I still persisted. I can say anything without being a eunuch.

The current book is good, but there are problems with the author, and the visual review is very shortᯅ̈

It's not much, you can just do it. If you really find it difficult to update, you can give up on this subject. I understand. If you're in a bad mood or feel uncomfortable, you can take a two-day break if you want. There's no need to force it. As long as you still have the motivation to write a book, I'll accept it.