Transmigrating and Landing Right in Front of Chongzhen

Sliding away, this book has now completely become a Ming fan's lust for the late Ming Dynasty. The protagonist is not a protagonist, but a tool man. No credit is required. Readers also work on the Ming ancestral system all day long, and you understand the Ming Dynasty better. But you don't understand politics at all.

After reading for so many years, I've finally found a great author whose writing truly suits my taste. What many people like might not be suitable for you; finding something that suits your taste is the most important thing. Keep it up, author!

It's all because the Mongols conquered Europe. White people still remember the Yellow Peril. But look at the Chinese: at the end of the Ming Dynasty, white people repeatedly and without cause massacred Ming citizens; the end of the Qing Dynasty was even more tragic. White people were the aristocracy among the yellow race. Foreign masters—royal family—officials—lackeys. But in just a few decades, the yellow race has forgotten their hatred. It's truly a pity for those who died unjustly.

The late Ming Dynasty was essentially a dead end; the emperor couldn't even control his harem! Imperial edicts couldn't leave the capital! Without any external assistance, the only way was for the emperor to rebel, slaughter everyone from top to bottom, and then occupy the capital and surrounding areas—at least then there would be no shortage of money and supplies!

It's just a cool novel, meaningless. The protagonist has no revolution and no people's democracy. In the end, the country is still the private property of the emperor. People who have seen modern times still don't understand what socialism is. Is it possible to travel to ancient times just for high-ranking officials and generous salaries? We have entered space and stepped on the moon.

Sigh, it's so hard to find a historical novel with a single female lead. So many time travelers have fallen victim to this. They uphold kindness, justice, integrity, and diligence—all the fine qualities of modern people—but they just can't seem to maintain monogamy. Don't bring up the idea that ancient times required multiple wives and concubines.

The author's writing about Chongzhen is untrue. Chongzhen's character was inherently suspicious. How could it be possible for the protagonist to trust the protagonist without reservation after just a few words and showing him some documentaries? There is also the fact that ancient scholars read the Four Books and Five Classics, poems and songs, and some may also read some military books.

The most important issue regarding trains isn't technology development, but rather storage and transportation. For example, in ancient times, some areas suffered disasters in the same year, resulting in crop failure and even cannibalism, while other areas had a bumper harvest. However, transporting grain from one disaster area to the other would result in over 50% loss during the journey.

To be honest, I read a lot of historical materials from the late Ming Dynasty, trying to find some possibility of turning the tide, and then came to the conclusion that it was hopeless!

Even in the seventeenth year of the Chongzhen Emperor's reign, it would be easy to save the situation; all one needs to do is escape to the south. By removing the traitors and civil officials, and elevating loyal ministers like Huang Degong and Zhou Yuji to lead hundreds of thousands of troops to defend the south, holding the south would be no problem.