Rewriting the Technological Landscape

I discovered that in the rebirth novels in Qidian, the protagonists love to fuck Muggles and praise Jack Horse. Is it because Qidian was acquired by Muggles for the sake of final dignity?

It is very well written. I suggest you arrange a right-hand assistant. The persona can be a business elite around 28 years old. His dream is to be able to create a world-wide enterprise with his own hands, so that the protagonist can let go and engage in research and development. A few of the supporting characters can be drawn into the book to give them in-depth characterizations. Come on, I believe this book will be a big hit. I will support it with monthly tickets after it is released.

The author writes very carefully, and many things are very good.

The protagonist is really selfish. Can't you tell the country about your rebirth? Isn't it better to tell the country about the future than to make a small fuss here?

All the people who are reborn still play games. I think such people are trash no matter how many times they are reborn, so I say goodbye.

The author is probably a civil servant, and his words are false and empty. He probably has never even published a script, so the plot he wrote is fake.

I want to say that the Internet is not the same as high technology

I don't know what happens next. I just read the 100th chapter, but I just don't feel comfortable. There are a few things here and there, and a lot of the protagonist's remarks fill a whole chapter. The overall experience feels a bit messy. It feels like the author wants to write everything, but can't write anything well. The intention is very good, there is no g Et is a bit more fun, and generally after the protagonist talks for a long time, the others basically say nothing, and then the matter is settled like this. There is no description of the other party's reaction. The main content is all the protagonist's opinions and explanations to himself. It seems that as long as the protagonist speaks, the conversation will be over.

It can be seen that the author is a person with ideas and ideals. But his writing seems insufficient to support his ideas. The writing is a bit awkward in many places and the overall wording and sentence making are not very good. Generally speaking, the writing style is too immature, not sophisticated and interesting enough, nor elegant and concise enough. The three views expressed by the author in the book are still very good. But when he wrote it, it felt awkward and secondary, which is really a pity. I hope the author can perform better. After all, you are a novelist and an author. How can I do it if my writing is not good? Come on!

Alas, why can't we look at the problem objectively? Returning to one's ancestors is a deep-rooted culture among Chinese people. However, at that time, very few people were willing to return to serve the motherland. It is true that the United States blocked it, but you learned your skills from others. Isn't that normal? Ten or even 15 years ago, how many people tried their best to immigrate to Europe and the United States, and how many wealthy people and eunuchs' children were abroad. Why? You must face up to your own shortcomings, and you must also recognize the strengths of others, learn from each other's strengths, learn from foreigners and learn skills to defeat foreigners, instead of being mindlessly patriotic, and look at problems objectively. The author doesn't know if it's a real angry youth or a deliberately created topic to attract readers, but it's really not advisable.