The Grand Secretary of the Ming Dynasty

The writing is too confusing. The protagonist is a 10-year-old child. I couldn't understand it since he entered Beijing. He encountered horse bandits and went to the border to do business. Traveling all over the country. The chaos was ruthless.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​I saw a lot of comments that asked questions. Some said it had too many classical Chinese texts, and some said it contained too much popular science and was too verbose. In short, I just felt that this book was not good or bad. Of course, it is not ruled out that some well-intentioned readers will feel sorry to see this novel with solid knowledge and rich content not popular, and thus remind the author how to improve it to meet the public's taste. After reading this book for a while, I also have some thoughts that I want to share with readers and the author. First of all, reading is a process of two-way selection between readers and writers. If you think this book is not to your taste, then you can quit and read another book. There is no need to criticize other historical articles in the comments. Mentioning other books in the comment area of ​​a book itself is a very rude behavior that disrespects the author. It's not that giving opinions is bad in itself, but that the behavior of pushing back is inappropriate.         ，，""，"" The ambition contained in this book is so huge that the "short and concise" form of online writing - completing the rapid plot advancement in a small number of words is not completely suitable for this book. That's why many readers have mentioned the problem of "large sections of popular science to persuade people to quit." Personally, I don't dislike articles of this style, because I don't treat online articles as a mere pastime for fragmented time, but with a serious mentality of accepting knowledge. I believe that there are not a few readers who agree with me, and at least I can insist on reading more than 2 million words of readers who have similar thoughts. Furthermore, as I mentioned before, the author's ambition is not satisfied with just telling a story, but wants to shape a real historical world through systematic description. But unfortunately, there are certain problems in the way the author shapes the world. The author believes that as long as he lists enough detailed historical information to prove that these characters were chosen in the original history, he can construct the authenticity of the world he creates. In fact, this is not the case, because when the author chooses a historical time-travel novel, the direction of history will inevitably change with the participation of the protagonist, and some choices will also change accordingly. At the same time, from the perspective of storytelling, listing information is certainly an effective method, but listing a large amount of information becomes an act that makes readers doubt the author's creation. If the character described by the author in the previous article is three-dimensional enough, then it would be reasonable enough that he would not need to elaborate on it when he makes a choice that is consistent with the logic of the character.         ，，， At the same time, the description of the behavioral logic of each character in the story is also relatively reasonable, and the behavior of each character basically conforms to the character image created in the previous content. The only regret is that the author could be more confident in his character description and does not need to quote large sections of historical documents to support it. After all, this is not an academic paper but a novel. Moreover, if it is necessary to explain the logic of the next action, you can try to use dialogue and specific events to do it. Simply using psychological description and historical documents does not conform to the form of the novel. Finally, I really like this book. Its description of the late Ming Dynasty has filled many gaps in my personal knowledge of this period of history. I sincerely wish that the results of this book will get better and better, and that the author's writing ability will improve step by step.

The writing is good, but the reason why this book does not do well! 1. There is too much nonsense in popular science, and there are whole paragraphs of popular science! Dialogue and plot are the key to the book. Does the author really not understand? 2. There is no female protagonist in cultivating immortality, I can understand that! After all, people have been in seclusion for hundreds or thousands of years. It's normal to be devoid of desires and not have time to have sex. But pragmatism is a man! Even if she is young, she can still appear in the early stage, and it would be good to make her a princess and princess to whet her appetite. The county leader came here through time? Did you shoot all the cannons before traveling through time? 3. Since we are taking the auxiliary route, we should...

The main content of the novel should be the plot. A large amount of popular science and narration will only distract from the main topic. Long paragraphs of the inner thoughts of the characters will only reduce the reader's reading experience. This is why the author's writing style is good and his knowledge is excellent, but his works are not popular.

What's interesting is that one is flattering and the other is flattering. As someone who doesn't know much about Ming history, it seems that this book's criticism of Zhang and Gao's affirmation are more reasonable. Reading the two articles makes people more interested in the Longwan era. Except for the long part of tracing the roots, the depth and plot rationality are better than Xiaoge Lao. Xiao Ge Lao is even more dramatic. The author can learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses. I hope you can write better works. It would actually be better to delete a lot of information hahaha.         💰❤️         ！

The author has said atheism several times... The problem is that you say atheism from time travel, and I always feel that it is very inconsistent.

This book should be greatly underestimated. A very nice book, great!

Some people who criticize Zhang Juzheng are really ridiculous! After seeing the boasts of several marketing accounts, I thought I understood everything. I really dared to boast that Zhang would be the same person for eternity. What a big face! Even Mingyue said clearly back then that he just liked Zhang personally, so he only wrote about Zhang's positive side in the book, and described Zhang's shameless behavior in one stroke with Spring and Autumn style. In fact, Zhang is famous because his whipping method caused all the people in the mainland to lose their homes and property, and they were exploited twice a year by the southeastern gentry and wealthy merchants! The southeastern gentry who had taken advantage of it had the right to speak. Of course they had to praise Zhang vigorously and wished that his whipping method could continue to be implemented! The funny thing is that it's already 2020, and there are still modern people out there following the trend.

The author is very serious in writing the book, and his writing style is also good. Many of the contents are quite informative. However... (Cough), the grades in the book were not good. When the plot is tense, the author will suddenly add content such as narration and personal biography, which is very long and seriously affects the continuity of the plot and the interest of the novel. The author has a very strong desire to explain and is often eloquent. If you listen to it not as a novel but as a history lesson, it will be very interesting. By the way, the author is not a teacher, right?

Come on, keep reading. For something that is clearly stated in one sentence, you must quote the scriptures and explain the source in detail.