The Rise of the High Tang

Why is it always emphasized that Shi is not trustworthy? Being a good person when you are young does not mean that you will not become bad in the future. This setting doesn't feel good

I have read many of your books, and the one that impressed me the most was your Cao Thief, without too much rouge. Your previous writings were really good, but you really disappointed me with this one. This is not a history book, and it is not even a book that an experienced writer should write. It is childish, boring, and disgusting. When will you also The writing is disgusting. This book even makes me feel that this is a fake work written by you. This book is really disgusting. Can you please write a book like Cao Thief and Prisoner again? Stop using this style. That kind of book is only suitable for children. It will only disgust adults after reading it. -Advice from an old book lover

The 75-year-old Wu Zetian's fair and delicate face is speechless 🙂

The author wanted to show the protagonist's wit, but what he wrote showed signs of weakness in every aspect, especially when he still didn't know the identity of Princess Anle after more than half of the book was written. It's too poisonous.

Since many things are your speculations, just say that you are the ones who speculated. Don't say that history is not trustworthy. You don't even believe what is clearly recorded, but you just believe in what you made up out of thin air. Isn't it ridiculous?

I find that most of these novels with historical backgrounds have one characteristic, that is, urgency! The environment of the peaceful era made it really difficult for the author to understand that era, but it can be seen from various historical books and other materials that human life in those eras was like grass and in troubled times! The ancients were very smart, but the cultural process only went so far. It's not that they were stupider than modern people! Most authors who write historical novels cannot avoid the word "urgent". As soon as they are exposed to that environment, they start to express themselves unscrupulously. The story progress is also urgent, and they wish they could do the things of a dynasty alone. This is actually a pity! It is absolutely impossible for an abnormal person not to be suspected, and even Mu Xiu Yulin died within three episodes! As the saying goes, there must be monsters when things go wrong. There is only one fate for a heretic, and that is to be killed in the long river of history! There are other so-called uses of products of the new era to change the society of the old era, but that is impossible! From the contention of a hundred schools of thought, to the dethronement of a hundred schools of thought to favor Confucianism, to the disputes between Buddhism and Taoism, as well as factional disputes, reforms, etc., What is not a river of blood? Which one doesn't accumulate over time? You, a so-called time traveler, just go over there and brag without restraint and everyone will accept it? What kind of joke were you kidding? If you really want to carefully think about whether it is possible for a modern person to participate in a certain era, then how can he adapt to that era first, integrate into that era, and then do something for that era, even if it is just planting a seed! Unfortunately, the novels I have seen so far are all the same, basically obscene, and satisfy most people's pretense of superiority! It is completely nutritious and not worth looking at! No author really works hard to write a good work, they all just want to cater to the majority of readers and make some easy and quick money! If the author reads this book review, have you ever thought about whether you put yourself into that magnificent era before writing the book? In addition to seeing it in history books, have you ever thought about adding it yourself to make it bloom differently? (Imagination and lust are not the same thing, although time travel is impossible)

What does the author mean by always emphasizing that history cannot be trusted? There are also those who say that Li Shimin changed history. The Old Tang Book was written in the Later Jin Dynasty. Although it does not mention that Li Shimin forced his father, it clearly records that Li Shimin personally led his men to kill Li Jiancheng and Li Yuanji during the Xuanwumen Incident. If it was really changed beyond recognition, how could you, the people of the Later Jin Dynasty, know this? There is also the Battle of Talas, which was obviously just a war between one part of the Tang Empire and Arabia, and the previous Sino-Western wars were victorious, with only one defeat, and had no substantial impact on the relationship between the two countries. To you, has it become a turning point for China to lose control of the Western Regions? The root cause of the loss of control over the Western Regions was the decline of the Tang Empire's national power after the Anshi Rebellion. What does it have to do with the Talas War? It doesn't matter if you don't understand history. Please don't write a book with bias.

I started reading books in 2005, and I got a high V that year. Over the past ten years, I have read not only tens of thousands but also thousands of books. I am definitely considered an old bookworm. The older I get, the more selective I read, and the less I read. In fact, I have read very few books in recent months. Fortunately, I came across this book, which really opened my eyes. I have just started reading it. The last time I had this feeling was when I was a "reborn layman" who chased a blind man a few months ago.

The more I watched, the more boring I became. The content was too long-winded and the plot progress was too slow.

Sometimes forcibly lowering one's IQ is poisonous. If the travelers come from the sea and are not of my race, wouldn't the travelers instantly think of the Japanese country? Have you ever been a criminal police officer?