Heart of the Castle

There are two types of Holy Mothers, one is compassionate to the weak without any bottom line, and the other is condoning evil without any bottom line. If it were the former, it would still be worth watching, but it's a pity that the protagonist is the latter. Huck at the beginning is a refugee camp leader who takes advantage of the fire to rob the self-proclaimed village chief. He is incompetent, greedy, jealous, and narrow-minded and selfish. If he is allowed to control the refugee camp, the refugees will be exploited and killed by him sooner or later. However, the protagonist actually talks to him about aristocratic rules and reason. Even after saying that he is the self-proclaimed village leader, you still talk to him about aristocratic rules. I am speechless. If it hadn't been for Grace, he would have driven the protagonist away. A virgin like the protagonist is really not suitable to be a friend, because if there is no plug-in to help him solve the disaster caused by indulging in evil, then he will be a lone star of evil, and everyone around him will be killed by him.

It's strange that there are so many other websites and some good novels that end in a sudden death. You guys have the ability to create a book that is now popular?

How long have you been reading? When you learn a term about the Holy Mother, come here and spray it.

WhenNian was a good book, but no one read it. Now this is a magical book, I really like reading it.

Who says knights are righteous? Western knights are like the Confucius family in ancient China. Hypocrite

This book was a good book back then, so you don't need to criticize it from your current perspective!

After reading this book, I suddenly understood that the reason why the savior is called the savior is because he has gathered around him a large number of people who help him. Even if he is a pig, if fate chooses him, as an assistant chosen by fate, you must obey. What's more, I think the most tragic character in this book is the one who was chosen by the author. At the beginning, I wrote about Levi, who traveled through time but was absorbed into the memory of the indigenous people. The sad thing about him is that he appears but there is no part of him in the whole text. It can also be said that more than 20 years of memories that transcend the boundaries of the indigenous people's vision did not have the slightest impact on the indigenous Li Wei who he traveled through. Therefore, the early writing of this book is indeed not very good, at least to me. I understand that the author wants to write a novel imitating Game of Thrones and A Song of Ice and Fire, but what I want to say is that imitating cats and tigers is not the opposite of dogs. Since you don't give Levi a role on Earth, don't write about him traveling through time. However, he was absorbed by an indigenous Levi after traveling through time. This is also the saddest thing in the whole article. The knight mottos in the article are regarded by the indigenous people as their belief and nobility. But in my eyes, I regard it as despicable. I think if Earth Levi could affect even one tenth of the indigenous Levi, this book would be more readable and interesting than it is now, especially after watching Game of Thrones. It feels like the original millet porridge has turned into the current black bread, which is difficult to swallow!

The author may be disappointed. How much have we lost? There are still people who can't accept this noble and valuable spirit. Why? Even if some people can't accept it, there is no need to slander this spirit. Don't you feel ashamed?

The protagonist is really childish. It would be understandable if he was really a 15-year-old aborigine. The key is that he still has all the memories of a time traveler and is still so childish, with no mental growth at all. In this case, what is the use of the author writing that the protagonist has the memories of a time traveler? It would be better to directly write about the original people. After getting the heart of the castle, he actually had the idea of ​​​​telling this golden finger. After being framed, others wanted to kill the protagonist directly, but the protagonist only had the idea of ​​​​blaming others face to face. This approach is still the psychological thought of the time traveler after getting all the memories. I can't stand it anymore.

It has become popular now, and I have missed an era.