Three Kingdoms: An Ordinary Man in the Late Han Dynasty

The good part is that it is not too exaggerated and can be considered a step-by-step development. The bad part is that the system is not written well, especially in the field division. There are no useful literati at all, and there are not many literate people. It is impossible to divide the land into households, and the land division system is also written in a relatively naive way.

Very good, it has the flavor of a horse riding on a mountain and a river. Unlike other historical hegemony texts, gunpowder is still gunpowder, as if there would be no war without gunpowder.

Rebellion at the bottom is not a dinner party. Instead, kill those with vested interests. Then reshuffle the deck. To win over the people's hearts. Form new interest groups. Let everyone feel that there is a future in working with you. To gather people. Not all high-ranking families can plunder family assets. Cutting off the roots. Even the initial accumulation of modern capital was bloody. What's more, it was the business of the Yi people in the feudal dynasty. This is not playing house. You can shout benevolence and righteousness. But it must be ruthless. Thick face and dark heart. Literary youth cannot write historical articles. Designated to fight

Well, finally he is no longer a prince or general. I don't know why everyone is so affectionate towards meat eaters even though they are sheep...

I want to say that the author thinks everything is too simple. What happens after dividing the fields? No one was farming, because according to the production capacity at that time, one family could not cultivate dozens of acres of land. In modern society, with machinery, it is hard for a family to cultivate dozens of acres of land Then there is complaining, why did the ancient military system have tuns instead of camps? One is the lack of talents, the other is the transmission of information, and the other is decentralization.

The author of the Xiaobai article in the Xiaobai article knows a little about people's hearts, military, and politics, and knows how to do it, but he doesn't know why it is like this. It is not the older and more advanced. At this time, we should practice formation, cultivate their discipline, win people's hearts, and let them have a sense of belonging, instead of just learning from the ancient military formations. Big brother military formations need to have grassroots officers, do you have any? People are illiterate, so you ask them to practice changes? At the beginning of the rebellion, you are a bandit, and no educated people will join you. So at this time, don't be vain and accept any medals or titles. This is meaningless. At this time, you should learn the political commissar system and care about the lives and psychology of the soldiers. You should not learn what you really should learn, you should not learn what you should learn, and you should mechanically apply what you shouldn't learn.

I found that many historical texts simply imagine guerrilla warfare as military behavior. When the enemy comes, I will run away, and when the enemy is alone, I will fight. If this is just the case, can it be called a great strategy? If you just do it this way alone, isn't it true that the rogue bandits in history have ever succeeded in this way? The flaw in the great man's theory of guerrilla warfare is not how to fight, but how to create a red base based on the people. This is the terrible thing about guerrilla warfare. Without the support of the people, where will you go? Going up the mountain? Not to mention the ancient beasts and poisonous insects, if you hide for more than ten days without salt, your feet will become weak. Without the people to inform you, where will you attack?

If you don't climb the technology tree, you might as well be the protagonists of the entire ancient aboriginal people. I don't believe that modern people who have traveled to the past can bear not to climb the technology tree when they have territory and people. It used to be difficult to overcome the vast ocean. For those who have lived in modern times, life in ancient times was definitely a time of suffering. If nothing else, you won't be able to bear it for a month if I throw you into a mountainous area with no Internet, no digital products, no running water, and no modern convenience products.😅

The war runs through the whole book, there is no cheating, and the writing is very historical. It can be seen that the author has worked hard to find information. The plot is okay, but the writing style needs to be strengthened.

Especially in cultivating talents. There is no need to use all ancient textbooks. Teaching efficiency in ancient times was not necessarily high. You are in the first grade of elementary school. The four arithmetic operations are addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. 500 Words commonly used in daily life (in the form of military songs). Knowledge of astronomy and geography. National History (Storytelling). This adds up to less than 3,000 words. Education through fun can also be done quickly. If you train scholars and officials according to the ancient teaching methods, there will be hundreds of schools of thought. Do you think you have the ability and time to organize such a school?