A Priest in North America, Yet the Deity Is Actually Me

It is ridiculous to use a lot of space to emphasize the requirements of belief in gods. How does loyalty to the family count? Does cheating count? In ancient times, there were three wives and four concubines. Does that count as loyalty? Does loyalty only need to satisfy one, or does it need to satisfy all loyalties? Do people who are loyal to the family but betray the country qualify, etc. What's even more ridiculous is to use ancient filial piety as a requirement. There is nothing wrong with being filial to parents, but the premise is that parents love their children and don't care about anything. Directly using the need to be good to parents and the need to make parents happy as a requirement is really powerless to complain. Ask yourself if you can be filial to the parents who have problems. And that family, after it develops, doesn't it become an ancient aristocratic family and clan? When it develops, doesn't it mean that it has a proper feudal social environment. It will not progress with the progress of society at all. If we use the requirements of feudal society to demand modern people, we can only say that this kind of god is not worthy of belief. What is the difference from the Western gods who forcibly stayed the society in the Middle Ages for belief The protagonist has no organization. It is best to change the belief requirements to the more normal moral requirements of modern society. Understand the twenty-four-character core values. Isn't it better to choose a few randomly? Don't copy ancient things every day, because ancient times are not always the essence.

It feels very strange. As a religious person who has become a god, the protagonist always emphasizes the power and significance of the clan, but he still takes the incense route. While worshiping himself, he also asks believers to worship the clan. Isn't it just reducing the incense. If this game is popular in the southern region of the country, it should be considered a compromise. How can this be done in a place where there are no traces of the clan? I thought the author was writing about ancient hegemony stories about uniting clans.

Chapter 16 is G. If you talk about filial piety and loyalty to the Ameken people, you might as well talk about bread to the Germans. It's very abstract.

I don't understand how many words you wrote, but the plot inexplicably jumped from a small town priest to an important figure that the world's major powers are demanding. However, the protagonist's skills have not improved at all, and he relies entirely on his words, pretending to be powerful.

The land god was poisoned. Now America is in a national crisis and is asking for help. As a result, the protagonist turns it into a business negotiation and allocates five places. He is poisoned. The highlight of this novel is that I am alone, even in the early stages. But after the content was put on the shelves, I only saw a good old guy who was essentially submissive and had no confidence. He was a low-level cow horse. Even if he was approved by a layer of immortality, his essence has not changed. This is strongly separated from the refusal to give in when facing the Knight of Destruction. The other natives in the book, as long as they have brains, will realize the problem. A few knights of destruction can destroy a country, and the forces of heavenly soldiers who are stronger than them can test and insult them. How dare you? I thought it was just playing house, could I do it again? Don't say that America doesn't know that the protagonist is a god. Even a priest has to beat a dog to look at its owner. Especially after beating the dog, when he asks for help again, he dares to negotiate terms later? I paid the monthly ticket by mistake earlier, so I gave it up. Goodbye.

The last few chapters have been boring to write. The protagonist seems cautious, but in fact it gives me a feeling of self-righteousness. Why should the protagonist admit that he is the wrong person, because the protagonist is relatively frustrated? It can't be Yang Jian? That's it. All respect the author's arrangement. I can praise the merits and wait for others to realize that I have admitted my mistake. It's none of my business if you admit your mistake again. I'll stop it. The way of writing this little bastard is a bit old, isn't it? I hope the author can clear up the situation as soon as possible. Failure to explain it affects the reading experience too much. It made me really upset after reading it in the middle of the night.

... Chapter 20, I read 20 chapters. The same thing must be said over and over again at least 3 times! The protagonist thinks/says it once, the others think/say it once, and then the text mentions it again... Brother, this is all in 20 chapters! Although it's free up front, you can't do this, water injection? I think a few words have been lost in the water... I really can't stand it anymore...

The idea is good, but the logic of your writing makes the protagonist look like a timid fool...

I've read Chapter 7. The plot is quite interesting, and the storyline is okay, but there's too much nonsense. It's not a matter of watering down, but it's really a lot of nonsense. Author, do you usually talk like this?

It's so poor, it's almost all nonsense. The story of almost 20 chapters can be shortened into one or two chapters, and it won't be unclear. The whole article is about popular science, and it goes beyond the power to grant gods. What do you take, and you can also grant it to others? The title is quite big, isn't it?