Reborn in 1983: The Prodigal Son Comes Home

After reading many comments, they all say that the author gives money to others and is poor and generous. The author says that people are stingy and their education is in vain. The author is not stingy and is quite a good person. Then you should not put it on the shelf. Take it off the shelf and let everyone see it for free. Be generous and don't be stingy.

The most ridiculous thing is that his parents took advantage of his absence to divide the good and new houses and let the protagonist's wife and children live in old and dilapidated houses. As a result, he was a second-rate man and rushed to give gifts without crying or making trouble. It really made me laugh to death. What else is the author writing?

No wonder you are so aggressive, and such words as refined self-interest can still be said in this era. I also admire it. Restrictions and exemptions cannot save your grades. I don't think about it. You have to write more than one million words to get such a few grades, and you are here to educate people all day long. Everyone, please read this book. Come here to relax. You are the oldest person here to educate people. Let me give you a suggestion. It is better to stop writing and go to work. Writing a book is not suitable for you. A master like Chen Dong wrote a book about the Holy Ruins that had a bad ending and was scolded by readers. He could change the ending to suit the readers. How come you are so refined and self-interested? Isn't it self-interest for you to make money by writing books?

While the house is dilapidated and the family of four is poor, they pretend to be generous and loose money! What character are you preparing? He was generous to his friends but didn't give his wife a penny!

The writing is almost meaningless, and has no sense of the times. He gives away money to everyone he sees, and he often gives half of the money to everyone when he is traveling to sea. The family is almost too poor to open the pot, but he is still poor and generous. A forty-year-old person has no experience or wealth.

I don't want to look at it when I see money being distributed casually. This is not a matter of brains or lack of brains.

The author has a hard time writing the book and the readers have a hard time reading the book. Can the royalties be shared equally?

I have read your New Peasant, and I think it is pretty good. However, the novels you have written since then have been worse than the previous ones. The content is mixed and messy, and the protagonist is very strange. He has no experience and no means. You always say why there are so many sophisticated egoists. When you help others, you think about your own wife and children, and you don't even fill your stomach to help others? That's not called being poor and generous, that's called stupidity. If you have seen opportunities, you rise to the social level. You only see individual phenomena and you give a general overview. And if you help him and he still feels that you owe him, it may be because you don't know people well. Society has always been that society, but our channels for obtaining information have become more efficient and more comprehensive.

The most annoying drama about the prodigal son returning home. A bad person will always be a bad person. You've heard of bad people getting older, not to mention the author's values.

Stop yelling at a group of refined egoists. It doesn't matter if your wife and children are hungry, but you can't be hungry, brothers outside🐶