The Mountain Spirit's Edict

1. The protagonist has failed classes for several years in a row. If his tuition fees come from his parents' hard-earned money, it doesn't matter if he is guilty or deserves death. If he is also from the Qidian Institute and works to earn tuition, then this is his attitude towards life. He can advise but cannot criticize. If you criticize, I hope you will be criticized every day. 2. Carrying private goods. If this was a classroom and he was a teacher, and he was teaching this in class, there would be nothing wrong with using the word private goods. But he is an Internet author. This is a character under the double theme buff of alternate history and fantasy. He is not a newcomer to the Internet literary circle. It is common for such works to have two lines of light and dark in the history, right? Only the protagonist in the world is aware of it. That's called subduing one's wits. There's no problem with history books. This book just sets the protagonist to be a bully. That's the author's subjugation of one's wits. It shouldn't be the reader's subjugation that the author is dealing with reality! What has the author done in history? If the author is really so capable, it won't be the readers' turn to complain. 3. Imaginary history. This theme is touched upon by all four major classics. Wouldn't it be a crime for later Internet authors to use it? Isn't it against morality? Doesn't it violate public order and good customs? It's not that this subject matter is so noble, no one else is qualified to write about it, right? The most important thing is that it's only the first chapter. I used some internet jokes in the first chapter, so that's not a death sentence, right? Wait, oh! "Internet jokes", let's look at the people who trolled, "humanities and social science students", it's not really what I thought, it's true that college student special forces are everywhere except in the classroom 😁 Cough, the above is a joke, if anyone feels offended, I apologize. But it's really hard to rule out that the quarrel in the first chapter happened because of this. After all, the current trolls don't look at the content when they start trolling, they only look at keywords. When the keywords are searched, they will immediately find a set of unbeatable combos. There are also a few that use their brains, so it is better not to do anything. It was said that there were fourteen months between December 1950 and February 1951. I don't know if it was deleted or not. Before the history teacher said anything, the math teacher blocked you first. This time is also a classic. "Human Fireworks" is compared with firefighters, just like Li Gui met Li Kui, and the official history of the Qin State is compared with folk unofficial history. Serious historians have to quote the classics to argue. A student dares to talk about it and boasts that he is right. Just because this unofficial history is posted on the Internet and "cannot be shown on the stage" can he be scorned at will? What kind of student is this, and what does he study? Before the coffin is sealed, whether he is discussed in alleys or pavilions, it will have no impact on him. 4. The above is the biggest flaw in my post, because this piece of unofficial history may have been proven to be false. It's a pity that this flaw can be fixed. The author said that this unofficial history in this book is true. Apart from the fact that you can't bear to abandon the book, can you really say that you can't write it like this? Click on the next question, it's only the first chapter. No matter how good this book is, whether the author is right or wrong, in just the first chapter, which of the above questions can be clearly concluded as right or wrong? I couldn't see the serious and pragmatic attitude of the "humanities and social sciences student". I only saw an eye-catching "online college student" without any scholarly qualities. It's not sure whether he is a real college student.

I still give up on civil science and pseudo-history, as they easily affect my normal view of history and are too idealistic.

The author probably has a cognitive system. There is indeed a big difference between science and our old traditional culture. Everyone knows that we should re-establish a cultural system that adapts to the development of the current era. However, there is no one whose teachings can really convince the public like the great sages like Confucius, Laozi, and Sakyamuni. The general environment continues to encourage people to indulge their desires infinitely, but the development of science and technology cannot make people live a happy life. Earth's civilization is only a few steps away from the abyss. Human beings who want to live a happy life must rely on the guidance of thoughts. Where does life come from and where does death go? There must be an answer. In the past, officials in ancient times were given posthumous titles when they died. Being a loyal minister and a filial son was beneficial, and the common people would even build temples for you for worship. Mythological systems, heaven and earth, and the Western Paradise can all solve ideological problems. Now everything has been overturned, but science or technology has solved the problem of people's food and clothing, but what about the problem of human survival, where do I come from, and where will I go when I die. Unless this problem is solved, human thought will never be able to settle down. If the mind cannot be stable, there will always be disputes in society. This is a fundamental problem. Only by solving this problem can human civilization have the possibility of upward development. If there is a great sage in modern society, he must be the one who solved this problem and explained it scientifically. The author writes well, this book definitely has the appearance of a god 👍

If the popular science knowledge is wrong, don't read it, otherwise it will reinforce the wrong impression.

To tell a joke, we don't have the patience to read well-written books.

Is the science knowledge in this book true? I hate this kind of science popularization that doesn't know right or wrong.

I feel that the research in the author's book is a bit too civilized, too counter-intuitive and counter-intuitive. Of course, if it's just a bunch of nonsense, I can treat it as an aside and not be affected. But the author's writing is very logical and self-explanatory, making people feel that it is really the case. At least with my meager historical knowledge, I can't see much of a problem. This makes me feel very uncomfortable. It is so counter-intuitive and counter-intuitive. It seemed fine following the logic in the book, but it went against my own common sense, which made me feel very uncomfortable and instinctively disgusted, and I couldn't get into it at all. It's actually a good book, but I just couldn't get into it and couldn't relate to the plot. This is the case with the author's last book, "Is It Possible to Live Immortally?"

When I read the introduction, I thought it was fantasy. When I read the content, I thought it was fantasy. When I read it, I thought it was urban fantasy. Only later did I realize that it turned out to be a popular science article.

I suggest the author not to torture a first-year junior high school child like that... And the heroine actually made a joke about asking her to be the hero's girlfriend. It's really torture.

From the first chapter, I want to complain about the topics you are researching and who is whose brother. Even if the research is confirmed, it is useless! Some even use state funds for research. What do you think is the use of your research? Where can it be used? Money is still spent, wow!