NCAA: From the Start, I Got Nick Young's Player Card

I can only say that Nick Young's attribute card with a 59 rating and Duncan, a junior with a 79 rating, understand both.

American universities do not recruit undergraduate medical students. Just let the protagonist study accounting! That school's trump card major. Wake Forest University's admissions are relatively strict, so the school's basketball team's record is not very good. Even with Duncan, it is only in the top 8. The fact that the system can answer questions is a bit confusing, just use it as a tool!

I read the comments and they all complain about Nick Young's low rating. Author, if you want to limit the protagonist, why don't you just give him a card from Nick Young's college period or rookie period? It's fine if he's not at his peak. If Nick Young has such a rating at his peak, that's really an exaggeration.

Nowadays, authors always try to make the readers' protagonists smarter first, so as not to make money easily.

The content of the works is extremely high. Basically, I have to cue my giaot in every picture. This is 1996, so you don't need to black out every picture.

It's a bit strange. My physical talent is very good, but I can't run any exercise and my value is as low as 60 or 70. If my physical talent is good, then I should only add technical points. Moreover, such a good talent and technology can not only be improved by adding points, but also can be upgraded through training and competition. Apart from this, it's pretty good.

The attributes at the front are a bit low, but at the back they are okay. Come on, author.

The author wants to divide it into sections. You can check it out on your mobile phone. There are so many sections and the experience is so bad! Newbies should improve more!

Can you divide it into paragraphs? There are more than ten lines in one paragraph. It seems that the experience is very poor. This is not a mature way to write web articles.

This sports article is written with real ink 😅