I Really Just Want to Lie Low and Win

The value of your C lying down is doubled, is it still considered a lying down win? Selling dog meat over sheep's heads is a bit of a failure.

This weight is really funny! Skinny and bones are not that light, right? Height 201cm and weight over 70kg.

Except for the wealthy families, there is no strategy at all! What tactics can a group of talented players have each year? Basically, it's singles, you just play what you're good at, right? Do you think there are any NBA stars who play Princeton tactics in the NCAA? How can you get five-star high school students with this poor tactics? Looking for guilt? Except for a few top wealthy families, wouldn't it be a baby bump for a five-star high school student to go to that university? When you chose a college, you didn't tell me what tactics you were going to use? No matter what you are good at?

I think this lottery draw in the early stage is the biggest failure. When the protagonist is only C-level, wouldn't it be nice to add some 100,000 to win? Author, if you want the protagonist to upgrade slowly, you can completely reduce the casual win value. It is disgusting to have to make a lottery. Isn't it good to put this lottery in S to increase SS? Anyway, 100,000 casual win value will only increase a little!

It's outrageous that toxic athletes rely on KFC to gain weight

Doesn't this send the joke to Africa? Joke is so talented, it would be a pity not to go to Africa.

The plot development of this book is okay, but the author's character attributes are really bad. Character attributes are composed of physical attributes and technical attributes, and physical attributes are talents. The author has set the strength and speed to be around 3040 except for physical fitness of 80. What is this concept? This is the attribute that people who have not trained have this attribute. People who have trained are all around 60. Those who are talented can improve quickly without limit and get stuck. Those who are not talented will get stuck when they reach the limit. The NCAA is 70-80, but can you enter the NBA without 80? The technical attribute author settings are also around 30. Isn't this nonsense? Take shooting as an example. Wouldn't it be possible to calculate the average by shooting five sets of 100 balls? With the addition of anti-interference, you, a five-star high school defender, can't say 70? You don't have the body to defend yourself? Author, you'd better play more games and take a look at the property settings in the game.

I don't know how to complain. Some of the things in the author's book are unreasonable. What the hell is a jump of over 40? It's true that there are levels of physical talent, but if you compare this with Americans, well, and if Carter is 90 and his peak jump is higher than the basket, then doesn't 50 exempt him from dunking? At most, it's not much higher than free deductions. This guy doesn't need to upgrade (except for pig's feet). It comes from talent. The NCAA has more than 40 bounces. However, I personally think there are a lot of 60 in the 70s, and very few below 50. The physical talent is innate, right? Are you funny at 40? Pig's feet 50 is understandable

If the protagonist's carry is doubled, why does he need others? The protagonist's carry reward should be set to be normal, but if his teammates win, it will be doubled randomly.

This attribute, well, it seems that it has not been set properly.