Heroes of Might and Magic: The Overlord

Do you know why ordinary people are equipped with a gold finger as standard? Because the average author cannot write how an ordinary person without cheats can reasonably push the world←_←

What are you writing about? The protagonist didn't even know whether he had the courage to fight in close combat, so he chose a knight because he was afraid of death, and then he didn't care whether he died or not. He took 10 archers and ten farmers to fight more than 20 wolves, and then when the fight started, he was too scared to move.

After reading the previous article, I was poisoned and died. I can only say that the author is either a student or has never experienced social beatings. Not to mention the chaotic character design, the rules he set are also various and messy. Morale itself should be used on living people. As a result, you directly Let me tell you that the soldiers and peasants under your command are cyborgs, and the morale thing is purely for attack. You can just turn it into a game, and you have to add a fantasy color to it, making it nondescript. No wonder Qidian gives you a limited exemption. If you don't limit the exemption, you can see the ghost!

Let me give you some advice. Isn't it funny to summon a female knight at the beginning of the summons? Do you think current readers still like this kind of novel?

Ordinary people want to be the protagonist even though they have nothing? Do you rely on the author's yy?

Remarks cannot be displayed, the ability can be roughly reflected in the name. These are regular arms, and there are also some hidden arms, which I will not reveal for the time being. Interested book friends can add more. Also, thank you to my brother Huanmeng for your support!

It seems so strange. It is clearly stated that all the troops recruited have no intelligence, but there is also a morale setting imposed on it. In a fantasy setting, we know that the protagonist is a hero and is destined to be powerful. How can he have the courage to question the soldiers that the protagonist has recruited to squeeze out the living space of ordinary people? Ordinary people in ancient times would question the powerful aristocrats, just to get angry. In the setting where the protagonist travels to the magical background of the Middle Ages, it is really inconsistent to do this. It is better to set the recruited troops to have normal intelligence and solve most of the inconsistency problems. As for the plot of questioning the protagonist, it can only be said to be poisonous.

After reading dozens of chapters, I finally understand why this book with millions of words is still not popular. The early stage is the time to lay the groundwork, looking at the protagonist's strengths, story settings, character creation, and narrative writing. Only by passing the test can we retain people. As a time traveler in modern society, the protagonist is very casual about camp selection, hero selection, and resource use, and his understanding of military units is also poor. Various conversations with village chiefs, priests, and temple reinforcements are also standard low emotional intelligence, and everything is based on immediate interests. Without the slightest understanding of interpersonal communication, it is true that marginalized people in society are. There is not much logic and thought in troop advancement and skill selection. They all rely on randomly generated heroes to give their opinions and then implement them. There is no highlight in the plot structure. It is extremely unreasonable to have only villages and no troops on the border of the empire. It is recommended that in addition to writing a book, the author also learn more about current affairs. He or she can read books or materials on social structure, interpersonal communication, team management, and various historical military affairs to enrich his knowledge. Before starting the next book, he can reasonably construct the background of the story, adjust the protagonist's personality and logical thinking, and optimize the way of character creation. Only in this way can we make big breakthroughs and retain readers.

If you don't write out the main character's thoughts, it can improve the perception of the novel. No one likes to see a hesitant and stupid person who wants to die. He is forced to do it for a long time and then regrets it. This kind of person should have died in a different world. He is a huge failure just by being alive.

If you can barely bear the other little poisonous points, the protagonist is like Erbi who is mentally immature. This point is completely unbearable. The protagonist's every word and deed constantly emphasizes his waste. I don't know what kind of mentality the author has to create such a protagonist.