Serving as a Priest in the City-States Era

I have finished reading the first hundred chapters so far, and I will briefly describe my personal thoughts after reading it: Advantages of this book: 1. The author has a very good foundation in history and mythology, and some of the things he considers are also very logical. 2. Combining history and mythology. If this subject is well written, it may become a god. Disadvantages: 1. The characterization is too poor, especially the protagonist. After reading a hundred chapters, the impression of the protagonist is very shallow. It is not as impressive as a Cadmus who just appears. This feels more like a group portrait? The protagonist is just a tool to promote the plot, right? 2. The protagonist's character setting is not clear. He can either take a kingly route to change the world, or follow the trend and integrate into the world, but I still don't understand what the protagonist wants to do? The biggest flaw is that the protagonist is a modern time traveler, and modern people have different views on the mythical era. They are always confused about their own position. They always like to point their fingers in self-righteousness and cause all kinds of troubles. However, they have high hands and low feet and lack of ability. If the Golden Finger is not strong enough, it will easily fall apart. If the Golden Finger is too strong, it will become a Long Aotian-style cool article. It is difficult to grasp the power of it. 3. The protagonist's personality is really unlikable and he can't figure out his own position. If he wants to have a harem, just open a harem. If he's selfish, just be selfish. What's the big deal. He likes people but is timid and submissive. The girl takes the initiative to get into his arms and pretends to be aloof. He is simply a scumbag and a hypocrite. He doesn't take the initiative, is irresponsible, and doesn't refuse, right? 4. The plot is too rigid and logical... It lacks a sense of logic. It is more like promoting the plot for the sake of promoting the plot... To summarize: the author is more suitable for writing papers. The plot of the novel suggests taking the route of fighting for world supremacy. The emotional drama is simply a headache. It is recommended to simplify it as much as possible and write less... The above is a personal comment, not to find fault, hope you know...

There is a particularly big problem with the plot of this novel. Pig's Foot traveled through time and became the overlord of the Mediterranean in one year, and even went directly to Egypt. Even a horse would have to run like this for more than a year, not to mention fighting in the middle! This development is too fast! It's not that fast in modern times

I would like to make some suggestions. First of all, the author has always emphasized that the protagonist is a modern person, so he can crush the ancients. Let me give you an example. Prime Minister Zhuge defeated the Wei State by himself. Can you, a modern person, do it? Not to mention whether you can adapt to the ancient system, as far as economy, logistics, military, etc., You are not a modern head of state. The two are not suitable, let alone a modern ordinary person. Secondly, the author cannot say that he knows nothing about war. He can only say that he is enjoying himself. I suggest the author go to station b to read the analysis of various famous battles. How much does it mean to bulldoze the Mediterranean in one year? I won't go into details about the problem. Finally, marriage does not mean that the country will surrender to you, or that you have the right to inherit. This is outrageous. Only one country is complete. Marriage is to strengthen the connection between internal forces and to stabilize the political power. It is not used to conquer enemy countries without bloodshed. The Han Dynasty and the Huns can annex it, right...

The author should not write Eastern mythology into it. If it is difficult to control, just write Western mythology! The East remains mysterious

I feel like the title of the book is no longer appropriate. The protagonist has only been a priest for a hundred chapters? After reading this, I feel that the main pleasure is to conquer and conquer the goddess "The Age of Mythology, from Priest of Athena to the King of Gods" "The Man of All Goddesses" "Civilization, Goddess, and Conquest"

The author puts aside popular science myths and stories, but they are all rubbish. My opinion is that it is better to read foreign myths and history.

After a long time, I returned to Athens. To be honest, this should have been done before death, so there shouldn't have been such a rush. It's not like he has a terminal illness or anything. Forget it, you didn't leave any backup plan behind. You didn't even take the most basic measures. You yourself know that it is impossible for the two women in Athens to command the entire Athenian Empire. Amnesia and loss of power, I usually skip this as if it is not a book. It feels like it's just for the purpose of deliberately keeping the word count low, as if if I didn't write it this way, it wouldn't be able to advance the plot. I will come back to see when the consequences of the sb operation that I committed for my own death have been dealt with. It's really just a matter of risking your life. And this kind of bet was originally unnecessary. How many years does a demigod live? You can take a year or two to consolidate it, or let the whole country build their own statues of gods together. Put your faith in compulsory education. After getting these things done, it's not too late to go looking for death. As a result, not even the prototype was completed, and the funeral arrangements were not clearly explained. Are you just telling those in Athens that they are the main component? What percent of the empire? So I said it many times before. The main character's wife must be the most powerful one, capable of suppressing others. It will be easier to deal with after death. As a result, you told a few people that in reality, you would have run away with others and fallen apart. It's really the kind that doesn't move your brain at all. In order to deliberately promote the plot, it is obviously inexplicable. It really makes me want to give up the book

The book is very good and the knowledge is very rich. It's just that the protagonist is not likeable. ——And the writing is a bit rough.

Little knowledge about the ancient Greek mythology era P1 (updated later depending on the situation) In any pottery urn or fired mural unearthed in ancient Greece, you will find a large number of scenes of heroes facing off against each other. This is the pinnacle of personal heroism... At the same time, in the hero duel scenes in ancient Greece, spears are almost always used as duel weapons. Leather armor is almost something we modern people have imagined. Product, the few animal leathers used in warfare in ancient Western history were also used in siege towers and battering rams. They were laid on them to prevent the enemy from using flame weapons to burn the equipment, and they usually got wet... Heavily armed bronze armored soldiers are called Hoplites, which read roughly like Hoplites. They generally operate in the form of a spear phalanx. In real wars, only heavily armed soldiers can fight against each other, and the way one side wins is often ridiculous... By not Continuous pushing and pushing squeezed the enemy's heavily armored soldiers out of the core of the battlefield, and then let some of the heavily armored soldiers turn around to reduce the dimension and attack the unarmored soldiers. Therefore, the casualty rate of the heavily armored soldiers in ancient Greece was often less than 5%. The ancient Greeks liked to make things up. Make up some unfounded stories. For example, if you can't defeat the enemy, you will write in the history books that the enemy used some sorcery to release the three-headed dog of Hades. Anyway, in ancient times, people of the Aegean generation in the West did not have the concept that history cannot be made up. For example, Homer's epic poems, the Odyssey and the Iliad were regarded as the most "authentic" history in the eyes of the Greeks at that time. Almost everyone thought it was true and did not accept refutation... Digression: The chaotic charge of the Persians in the Three Hundred Warriors of Sparta actually looked like the Greek coalition in real history... The Greek coalition encountered the Persians and the army for the first time, and was shocked by their strict and orderly marching and combat methods! Therefore, the Three Hundred Warriors of Sparta are worthy of being filmed by America to disgust Persia. Today's Persia is actually Iran...

Incorporate personal work into the book, include domestic political content in the book, and avoid such important political stuff.