Reversing the Course of Greek Mythology

If you don't want women who have been used by others, then how many women can you accept to create a harem as chaotic as Greek mythology?

There are too many private goods, and they are also crazy about themselves. It is really a pity for such a profound foundation of Greek mythology. Apart from his understanding of Greek mythology, what this author writes is just crap

Zeus By the way, Zeus is the dominant supreme god in Esotericism, Theogony, and Homer's epics, the only god in polytheistic religions, but Greece perished before it became a monotheistic religion. Even the most implicit theogony describes Zeus as being more powerful than all gods and men combined

The biggest shortcoming of this book is that the protagonist has no brains and thinks he is in the mission world. He has not even figured out how many lives there are, so he is brainless. He is also arrogant and arrogant, which blinds the author's understanding of Greek mythology.

Since you have the godhead of light, just evolve, go to Syria to be a shepherd, and go to Egypt to shepherd sheep. A few years later, I brought a group of sheep back to Greece.

In the world of Greek mythology, where killing and fucking, especially fucking, are top of the list, inserting a castrated protagonist to talk about history is really weird.

I feel that the image of the protagonist is too fragmented: His behavior and moral principles are all authentic red-neck style, and he can even be said to be a barely civilized barbarian But his analysis of myths and attitude towards gods do contain the Asia-Pacific's loose dialectical attitude of trusting what is useful and not trusting if it is not useful This causes the protagonist to always be in a state of reckless duality. As long as he does not fight, he will think that he is invincible. The moment the battle begins, he will worry about the comparison of the combat power between the enemy and ourselves. If he can beat us, he will switch to the Greek "big hero" form: I have a big fist. I am justice, and the enemy with big fists is the enemy (especially when killing Odysseus, Athena is the mastermind, I can't beat her, so I will kill you. The cause of this incident, because I can beat you, so I am just) The protagonist fought against Athena for the first time. He was knocked down twice and was immobilized by one glance. However, after he quit the battle, he became reckless again: I can't beat Athena, but I have the courage to defeat her! Then he tried to touch Athena without considering any way to strengthen himself and weaken his opponents, just because he based his guess on mythology that the gods would become weak. He did not consider whether the weakening was gradual, or whether the opponent would be so weak that he could not defeat him as a "two-in-one enemy" before he and Athena started fighting The most important thing is that the protagonist is superstitious about "systems". This is a mode of thinking that modern people can only have after being influenced by online literature. But if you assume that he is a primitive god playing for two weeks, then how do you explain this "system detachment theory"? Because Zhou Mu is a modern person, and now he has been marinated by the fools of Greek mythology? Then his willpower is too low, right? As a Chinese with black hair, black eyes and yellow skin, can I think he is a banana? The author can completely set up a golden finger for the protagonist to break the iron law that "mortals cannot kill gods", and then see this history through the eyes of the protagonist, an outsider, and criticize this myth through the mouth of a Chinese. But if you set the protagonist to be a player in the second game, a Greek primitive god who has been pickled, I feel that the sense of substitution is gone, and the rationality is torn apart by the setting. You said you want to introduce history, but I just feel that its historical weight is gone, and there is only a pornographic article about a goddess who has been captured and spreads her legs to penetrate her.

I feel that the author is very proficient in Greek mythology, but his knowledge of other myths and history is less than satisfactory. For example, his understanding of Hittite mythology. Not many Hittite myths exist in the world. It is basically a myth about the storm god King Taipushu and the plant god Tieliepin. The sun goddess Alia has a high status but no mythology remains, and she is even lower than her husband Taipushu. It is unlikely that Alia represents the Hittites, and it should be Taipushu.

How to put it? Facing the protagonist It feels like a kind of arrogance unique to Westerners Seeing the protagonist traveling through time, I didn't describe much. It also gives people the impression that he traveled from the West and is proficient in mythology. If I say it unpleasantly it is arrogant and arrogant It is written like an Eastern narrator with a Western protagonist It feels like it is not well integrated But the author's story is very well written. Why~it is not a story, but it can be clearly felt that the author is very careful and he is serious about writing novels. , Very rigorous, Just like in middle school, use? The proof method makes the article more ~~ This is the feeling. But I feel like the author doesn't have much description when writing the protagonist, and often doesn't think about it, just like the red-skinned barbarian (Ultraman, no one really knows about it) just type it up. The writing style of writing the protagonist and the story are a little different, one is too thick, and the other is too thin. It's not adjusted well, Of course it's just my personal opinion, the author has a look at me, Add more details (*^ω^*)

After reading more than a dozen chapters, it seems that there are really very few Greek mythology novels! Probably no more than one hand in the whole network! It's the author's way of writing the narrative that makes it feel distorted. The readability of this novel is completely lost. It's like I'm reading the original version of ancient Greek mythology. It's the way ancient Westerners write narratives!