Turning the Clouds

What are you doing, author? In addition to this book, I see that you have written three books. None of them are about peasant uprisings or worker-peasant revolutions. They are all about the upper-level line Revolution of Qin. Not to mention, the protagonist wants to influence Qin Shihuang from the beginning. He is from the upper level and has not cultivated his own base. This cannot be cultivated. Men, just wait for Zhang Jiao to die, and you will be the Taoist Master of Taiping Dao. Now that Zhang Jiao is not dead, you can be considered half of it. You haven't cultivated your own basic base, and you haven't told your senior brothers about your ambitions and goals. In this book, I married Miss Xie and used her political influence, but I still didn't have my own base and didn't cultivate comrades. They keep describing class suffering, but they fail to cultivate comrades. I don't know what others think. Anyway, I don't want to take the upper-level route. The protagonist is now trapped in the rules of feudalism and the bourgeoisie, and the protagonist is still thinking about how to win within the rules. Even if you go to rebel somewhere else, then negotiate an exchange of interests with this Dayun, and then slowly cultivate comrades and blossom everywhere. These are troubled times and modern times, when the cause of communism is making rapid progress, but you are rising to the top! When Lenin founded the Soviet Union, he only thought that if he could survive longer than the Paris trade union, he would be successful. If you want to temper the protagonist's will, it is not impossible to temper it in the revolution. I also think that the best and fastest way to temper the will is in the struggle between iron and fire. There is no need to go up to the upper level, this is no longer the ancient times.

On the surface, the author writes that the protagonist wants to overthrow oppression, but why do I always feel that the protagonist wants to be seen as a domineering person? Why don't you stop pretending and just wake up and take over the world, get drunk and lie on the knees of a beautiful woman.

Why does it feel like the author is kneeling and shouting for freedom?

After reading it, I am speechless. It is good to read, but if you publish this subject at the beginning, it will be difficult to write about it later, unless you go crazy and take other paths. So I will burn incense here in advance

I have never been superstitious about the market and firmly believe that good writing can break everything. Come on.

Everyone, I'm withdrawing! The reason is probably that the protagonist is holding the noble's thigh while sharpening his knife to chop him! Even under the banner of righteousness, it can't change the character of the protagonist, who is just a "selfish white-eyed wolf"!

He is not willing to understand his enemies at all, and thinks that his enemies are still stereotypes. The old society is not without smart people. Don't think that you can change everyone by yourself, just like our society relies on the overall strength to change individuals.

I feel a bit contradictory. I think the male protagonist wants everyone to stop kneeling, so the price is that most of the characters who appear now have to die, because they are vested interests, and the author describes these characters as despising the lower class people in their bones. Of course, the author can also write them to change their minds, but it will ruin the characters, especially the sixth lady in the article has already written to kill several servants, and the other characters are not developed too much and the characters can be changed. If the author writes the characters who appear now so that the readers will be bored and die, they will not feel much, but if they are given a positive description, it would be a pity to write them dead, and it would be even worse to write them alive. So, I feel a bit contradictory.

It seems that there are more than ten chapters. I originally wanted to read some good niche online articles, but I was struck by lightning at the beginning. A pound of sweet potatoes costs six cents, and a pound of chicken and fish costs about one cent. The author himself said that one dollar is equivalent to three to five thousand in future generations. He actually pities the old man who runs the stall and earns two or three cents a day, which is equivalent to a daily income of one thousand yuan. He even followed his teacher to conduct an investigation. The old man said that a family of six eats and drinks for only a few cents a month. These prices are crazy! In the large-scale high-tech farming in the United States, the price of meat is not that much different from that of biscuits and sweet potatoes, and the income from stalls cannot be so high. They also despise the old man's low income (can feed 60 people). The meat-related industries, pig herders, chicken and duck farmers, fishing workers, and large farmers and landowners, are selling at this price?

The world view of this book doesn't feel very reasonable. Dayun should currently have three social structures. Land and factories under the control of the emperor. Land under the control of nobles and gentry. A factory controlled by some nobles. This structure is actually very similar to Spain, but Spain's industrial capabilities are very weak. It actually has a large number of colonies, but they were dumped by Britain and France. Why is Spanish industry weak? Because without free market competition, there will be no efficiency. History has illustrated this countless times. A monopolistic and bureaucratic economic system like Dayun is bound to have low production efficiency and lacks motivation to expand production. For example, the emperor was a monopoly in many industries, or an administrative monopoly. In this case, what most people want to think about is not expanding production and developing technology. This conflicts with Dayun in the book who is eager to open the market. On the other hand, it is abnormal for nobles and businessmen to be so honest. . . It has all developed to this point. Profit became the supreme belief, and feudal morality began to decline. Why are you so honest?