Plowing the Han

After seeing Chapter 134, it's still hard to accept it and I'm not happy about it. It's right to foreshadow the plot, and it's right to want to sensationalize, but I just feel very uncomfortable. I just think this is a whitewash. Do you have the guts to be corrupt, have the guts to run out to eat, drink and have fun, and finally help the protagonist block a knife to clear your name? Zhang Gou leaked so much information and killed so many people, but the protagonist actually thinks he didn't betray? So the protagonist feels that leaking information about friendly forces is not considered betrayal? Do you think it is not a betrayal that those who died were not our intelligence officers? If the slaves who provide information are killed by someone other than one of our own, does that count as betrayal? The protagonist gave me a really good feeling at the beginning, and I really liked this different Three Kingdoms story. I tolerated the system and the flaws in the technology, but up to this point I only felt that the protagonist was really incapable of implementing his ideas. Even if he went to attack Dongpingling, I didn't think it was unreasonable. It's only natural for people to be angry and revolt. But when someone betrays his ideals, he actually chooses to forgive him. This really subverts the purpose of the book, so much so that I feel that every next sentence he says is a show by the emperor. It's too uncomfortable, I wrote a lot, and there is no logic. Just watch it, just to vent your emotions.

I was disgusted by this betrayal of brotherhood and ran away. Then in the past two days, because of the recommendation of Jin Mo Long Sword, I ran back and picked it up. Because it had been too long and I had forgotten the details. I thought it looked good at first, but then I kept thinking about why I slipped away in the first place.，：1，，，，，，，，，， Of course, the war can continue, but in fact there is also a break. You can write about daily life, write about political reform, system innovation and talent cultivation, and write whatever you want to advance the plot. Of course, it must be a war in the end. A war ends a plot. Is this a novel? The author is so kind, he cut it right from the beginning and left it to play the whole war. 2. In fact, the first question is not the most critical question. The most critical issue is that the author will suddenly give you a defense. At first, the brain was quite normal, but suddenly it became abnormal. Originally, the Taishan Army was trying to develop well, but suddenly someone betrayed him, the protagonist suddenly became emotional, and suddenly the literary youth wanted to kill him alone. Please understand, you are the leader of a military and political group, and the power of an emperor lies in gathering the crowd. What are you trying to illustrate with this plot? This kind of inexplicable plot that suddenly appears is, in my opinion, connected to the first problem, which is that the author cannot write plots, so when he wants to write, he can only write this kind of reply. 3. There is no main line. I guess the author originally wanted to follow the historical process like many Three Kingdoms novels, but accidentally broke down the writing, so he started fighting all the way. As long as he fought, he would win. I don't know how to win. It is said that the protagonist is invincible. He can boost the morale of a powerful military and political group with a few words, so that the army can keep fighting and getting stronger. If you understand, the readers are tired after reading it. The people in it have to want to die, and you don't let people rest. That's it, you've been blinding me for a few days, Mike is a rip-off! Why did you give him so many monthly votes for nothing? You tricked me into watching this.

What a barren stuff the latest chapters have written. The protagonist's career has improved, he has gathered thousands of troops, and the situation is looking good. Suddenly another traitor appears, and the protagonist insists on taking two people to fight against him, and ends up trapped in a tight siege. The protagonist is so incompetent and furious...

Regarding the issue of "Cheat Finger" I see many friends are discussing the issue of "Cheat Finger" and "system", and everyone has their own opinions. Let me share my views after communicating with the author: We all know that "poor literature and rich military power". In ancient times, especially in the pre-Qin and Han Dynasties, aristocratic families monopolized culture and knowledge, and also monopolized force. Without enough nutrition, medicinal materials and free time, it is impossible to build up strength and cultivate force. Therefore, if you really want to rise in the troubled times of the late Han Dynasty, you must be a bad guy in terms of force. Otherwise no one can beat it. So the "system" emerged. After all, the protagonist's monopoly on culture and knowledge has made up for his shortcomings through time travel, but in terms of force, the shortcomings of the original Zhang Chong are actually difficult to make up for with materialism.

There is another pitfall. The protagonist writes Zhang Jiao too badly. The three Zhang Jiao brothers all have no descendants, so there is no way they have any intention of fighting for power. I think that the three Zhang Jiao brothers know that rebellion will inevitably lead to death and defeat. Knowing that they are being used by aristocratic families, they still want to start a rebellion of the lower class people and let them see the anger of the lower class. As preachers, the three Zhang Jiao brothers have healed dozens of lower class civilians in the world. They are a powerful family. I think they are more like idealists. They also knew that they were about to die, so they started a rebellion in the last years of their lives. Moreover, I read in other Three Kingdoms novels. The authors checked the information and said that the Year of Jiazi was another year of drought in the country at the end of the Han Dynasty. The poor people at the bottom would starve to death if they did not rebel. The three Zhang Jiao brothers foresaw this outcome and rebelled in this year.

The pace is already slow, and having to describe the side missions in detail is really uncomfortable. Zhang Liao's chapter sets up most of the chapter, Zhang Liao appears, and the introduction is over. And he's not going to join the protagonist. Is it necessary to introduce it in such detail? ? ? ?

About Yang Qiu. Historically, this king was a cruel official and wanted to eradicate the eunuchs. But it is strange, why did he want to kill Duan Xi, who was a powerful man in the army at that time? History has no record. The author came up with an idea based on Yang Qiu's character: Because he must retaliate, an overtaking before entering the palace caused this political bloody battle. Originally, Yang Qiu planned to enter the palace to express his gratitude, but because of Duan Xi's insult to him, he ignored the plan and angrily decided to falsely accuse Duan Xi in order to vent his hatred. This is also the influence of the strong customs of the Han Dynasty. Also, how did Duan Xi die? History records that after the death of Wang and his son, Xi also committed suicide. Suicide? Is this the end of a heroic warrior from Liangzhou? Maybe history means he committed suicide. But how does the author creatively depict this person? First of all, as soon as Duan appears, the author describes a unique means of travel, a chariot carried by twenty people. Historically, does Duan have this? In fact, no, because it was specially made for Shi Hu's fat body during the Northern and Southern Dynasties. The reason why the author added this paragraph is actually because of Duan's character, who is as straight as a stone tiger and cruel. Also, he hid troops in the palace and insulted Yang Qiu in the imperial edict. The author was all expressing the Liangzhou warriors' disdain for the entire central officials. Not only him, but also Dong Zhuo behind him, it can even be said that almost all Liangzhou warriors had this trait. Why? Because they had developed from the war into the most violent group at that time during the three conquests of the Qiang, and this group was abandoned by the central government several times. Everything they have now is earned by the children of Liangzhou themselves in the war. Therefore, they looked down upon those Kanto scholars who wanted to abandon them. So when the author writes about Yang Qiu, he is not writing about Yang Qiu alone, but about the last group of scholar-bureaucrats with big ambitions. They still try to use methods within the system and rules to eradicate the eunuch group. After the deaths of Yang Qiu, Chen Qiu and others, the scholar-bureaucrats of the Han Dynasty no longer considered using this route to resolve disputes. Later, Yuan Shao invited foreign soldiers to Beijing because of Yang Qiu's failure. Then the author writes a paragraph, which is also very clever. From the beginning, the emperor didn't want him to die, and then Yang Qiu wanted to force him to commit suicide, but how could a martial artist commit suicide, so he broke out of the prison, and in the end he was captured by the judge and committed suicide. The whole story is designed with twists and turns, and finally a tail is given, that is, why the emperor will kill Yang Qiu a few months later, explaining the motivation. Finally, I especially appreciate the author's careful exploration of a character and his matching. Historically, Shen Pei never appeared in this story. Through discovery, from the time he was born of Chen Qiu to the second-ball league, this person had to be creatively added. In the future, Shen Pei, as Yuan Shao's important adviser, opposed the establishment of the emperor. Wasn't it because of his experience with the establishment that he was completely disappointed with the Han Dynasty? Finally, what I want to say is that when reading these chapters, I always thought that they were not written by the author, but that history was just like this, just telling us under the guise of the author's pen. What do you think?

Hedong, Guanzhong, Shandong

Xuande, the guy next door, banned me just because I said he was stupid and crazy! It's a shame that I haven't subscribed to this book recently, so I subscribed to him. Absolutely!

A: The reasons why there is a golden finger: 1. Accelerate the protagonist's growth in force. The protagonist's class is too low. The possibility of him being able to stand out and even change history can only be had on the battlefield. But four years later there will be a big change. How can he, an ordinary farmer, survive, so this golden finger is a last resort. 2. In order to give readers a richer experience. Let's talk about why online game cheats are so popular? Because it is quantifying this complex world. Words are too lacking to describe actual force. Either you are proficient in bowing and horse riding, or you are proficient in spear and stick, and then you can't write down the details of what you have mastered. This golden finger divides martial arts into four levels: mastery, proficiency, penetration, and integration. In this way, when a character appears, readers will know at a glance, oh, his strength is at this stage. B: Will Golden Finger destroy the entire book? No, because this is a real world. For example, a warrior who is proficient in swordsmanship can be caught in a net and stabbed to death by a peasant with a manure stick if he is not careful. There won't be the absolute dominance of high levels over low levels like online games. The real world still lies at the upper limit of personal martial arts. No matter how brave Lu Bu was in history, he still had his head taken off. Lu Bu is brave enough to be like this, but he doesn't say he will be victorious in every battle. For real war, the impact of personal martial arts is greatly weakened. So this golden finger will not appear, killing indiscriminately, unparalleled. Finally, what I want to express is that this is a rigorous and orthodox historical text, not what you think of as a systematic historical text. Readers can continue to read further.