Three Kingdoms Lord: From the Start, I Threw Myself into a Giant Python’s Mouth

Let me make some pertinent comments The author quotes a lot of allusions, so it seems that this book is very powerful. However, if you exclude the classical Chinese and allusions mixed in the article and look at the plot alone, it is obvious that the logic is irrational and the plot still needs to be polished. 1. At the beginning, the protagonist thinks that there is a world of great war, so he risks his life and throws himself into the mouth of a python to kill the python. The purpose is just to eliminate the villagers' prejudice against him. This plot portrays the protagonist as a very adventurous person who races against every second and has great courage. But what happens after killing the python? The protagonist started to play fish in the water again, inexplicably portraying the protagonist as an image of inaction, mediocrity, detachment and indifference. Isn't there a big gap in the protagonist's personality? According to the protagonist's initial personality, shouldn't it snowball and expand rapidly after gaining an advantage? It's hard to imagine a person who was so brave and fearless at the beginning, but then became timid and hesitant after gaining an advantage, but the author portrayed such a person. 2. The protagonist's golden finger can be considered to be an immortal paradise composed of unknown fragments. But for this unknown fragment, according to the description in the article, the protagonist probably only saved a few hundred, and then he put together a hundred usable fragments to synthesize the Immortal Blessed Land, and then he pieced together an Immortal Island. It can be seen from here that the probability of immortality is still considerable. So, there are so many people in the world, and there are many lucky people who have an advantage over the protagonist at the beginning. Can't they discover the secret of the unknown fragment? I think the golden finger of the protagonist is too far-fetched. 3. The protagonist's description of where players gather is logically confusing. There is a supporting character named Li Mei, who is in her thirties. The background given to her by the protagonist is that she was alone, and was forced into a shack by three people to become a woman. In the end, she was even used as a money-making tool by gangsters. This description depicts the chaos of public security, moral decay, and distortion of human nature in the place where players gather. But when the protagonist establishes a village later in the article, he also portrays the player group as a vibrant and spontaneous image of selling tofu and setting up a stall. Isn't this contradictory? The author's descriptions of these places are always brief and do not go into detail. However, the description of each character will reflect the background environment at that time. The background environment is inconsistent and illogical. This needs to be polished and carefully considered when conceiving the plot.

Miracle, a treasure emerges from a pile of junk!

This book has so much potential, bro, it's so cute. Give it a try.

It's really good. It may have flaws, but the flaws are not hidden. I hope it won't collapse or be written better in the future. Finally, there are slightly fewer updates. There's no rush. It depends on the author's daily inspiration. Just keep updating. As a reader, I have this requirement.

I haven't started reading yet. Let's start by asking if the author has any misunderstandings about 7 billion. 7 Billion traveled through the Three Kingdoms in ancient times. More than 90% of them would starve to death just by eating. Ancient productivity simply could not feed that many people.

Wouldn't the author give it to me? If you have no idea or no time, just send out a leaflet to talk about it, otherwise I will be worried about the author himself, ugh

Let me briefly talk about my views on this book: 1. The content is very interesting, with many allusions and stories about gods and ghosts. I personally like this kind of book. 2. The logic is relatively self-consistent. For example, if the earth travels to ancient times and there are 7 billion people, it is obvious that food will not be enough. So before I read Chapter 49, the book stated that the most important thing in the player's goods is food. 3. The protagonist's character has a normal IQ. Unlike other junk books, the protagonist talks in a nonchalant manner whenever he has a chance or asserts his identity as a modern person. For example, at the beginning, the protagonist was framed by the eldest brother of the Liu family. The protagonist did not retaliate irrationally, but worked hard to get out of the current predicament and made full preparations before retaliating. Another example is that there was a female partner named Ma Xiaojiao who said bad things to NPCs due to various profit reasons. The protagonist knew for some reason that this female partner had an opportunity that he had not received and was not a big threat, so he decided to fatten up and then kill her. 4. Goldfinger seems to be fun and not over the top at the moment. For example, the protagonist has an immortal weapon, which is an independent world and building a village in it has different effects, such as obtaining some strange villagers (very interesting species, somewhat similar to the human race in Shan Hai Jing) There are currently no others. There are also shortcomings, such as the words are obscure and difficult to understand, but this is also a characteristic. Summary: Daliang grass has great potential As a lazy person, I don't like to post long reviews, but I found that some people actually spent money to slander this book, so in order to prevent a good book from being lost to people who work hard, I posted this long review. Finally, everyone should have their own ideas about things on the Internet, and don't be used by bad people. Well everyone.

I want to know what to eat in an era when hundreds of millions of people suddenly descended into rebellion because they had no food to eat? Is the food refreshed in the middle of the night?

The first chapter persuaded me to quit. Personally, I felt that the opening chapter was quite good. It was the last two paragraphs of the first chapter. Is this guy talking without thinking? There are also such ridiculously bad plots. I decided not to read it later.

It's a bit fake. In this comment section, no one has discussed or liked the plot of the book in detail. It's just pure and unnutritious praise. Based on my experience of reading online articles for nearly nine years, it's a bit strange.