Back to 1995

Having read books for so many years, I feel that the protagonist's future development in this book will most likely involve being "fed" (i. E., Exploited and exploited). After all, he doesn't have a strong background. Think about it, even someone like Bill Gates, with his family's wealth, had to get various conglomerates to invest in his large company.

I suggest the author write less about domestic events; the male protagonist's actions perfectly illustrate what it means to be a top-tier simp. To be honest, the fact that the male protagonist didn't use his foresight to harm China shows that he lived up to his identity as a Chinese person in his previous life, and his patriotism is commendable.

Guys, can you recommend some American business novels? Completed or ongoing, it doesn't matter!!!

This is ridiculous and absurd. The US had video calls in 1996? Why didn't they just do live streaming? Forget about this kind of BL (Boys' Love) content.

I think that considering the protagonist's faction and the fact that the majority of readers are Chinese, to avoid creating any negative elements, it's acceptable for them to participate in the development of the domestic internet, even if it means exploiting its users. However, they absolutely must not involve political infighting or any secret assistance; that would severely damage the story's logic.

[The protagonist's acupoint] In the US, political correctness is paramount, and anti-China sentiment is a key indicator of US policy. By focusing on whether the main character is "pro-US and pro-China," the US can strip the main character of everything. Evidence 1: Has Chinese ancestry (the most fatal point)

Have you been writing something rather disgusting lately? You're an American, and of Italian descent at that. It's one thing to be optimistic about the Chinese market and invest, but why are you so eager to fawn over it? What did China have to fawn over 2000 years ago? If you're going to write about America, just write about America properly, don't be so disgusting!

Shouldn't all shareholders dilute their shares when exchanging equity and raising funds? It seems like in the Yahoo equity exchange, everyone contributed their own shares, and none went into private hands. Shouldn't the equity be distributed among all shareholders according to their respective shareholdings after the exchange? Why did it seem like only the main character contributed?

Good evening, everyone! I'm 9527, your reporter for the time travel segment! The current situation for cross-country sports is excellent, and it's only getting better! After traversing the 5,000 years of history before China was occupied, the people of the Celestial Empire have now crossed national borders and are traveling to friendly nations around the world!

I just don't understand why the protagonist always ends up giving away all the benefits of their shares (and the company has other shareholders besides the protagonist). If that were the case, why would the protagonist need to give away all their shares? The company could grow even faster and better that way.