Hollywood in the Making

It's really disgusting to see that 60 million US dollars was spent to film the Joker. Will Smith's 2013 science fiction movie Return to Earth only cost 60 million. Keanu Reeves and Halle Berry's rapid preparations in 2019 only cost 55 million. In reality, the Joker in 2019 only cost 50-70 million. You invested 60 million in making Joker in the 1990s. Where did you spend the money?

Okay, you update less and I can understand the word count. It's a good meal. But in Chapter 388, copying and pasting someone else's video uploader's video is too much, and it doesn't even cover it up. You are really strong in cross-border plagiarism I have ordered all of your book. It is difficult for people to think that you are writing a book seriously.

Seeing the script leaked, haha, I really can't hold it in anymore. With an investment of 160 million and a box office profit of hundreds of millions in the later period, this leak will kill a lot of people. The author and capitalists have really clean hands. It's so funny. He is a fat pig and can cause several accidents. If you have some courage, try it. It will really make you laugh to death.

Naomi Watts- 6 Halle Berry- Uma Thurman- 6 Ethan Hawke-

After being reborn for more than 20 years, the protagonist has not saved the initial funds to make the first movie, even the funds for a low-cost movie... Such protagonists are really rare, it is better to set it up just now.

To put it bluntly, it is actually best to make commercial films across generations. Every feature film has its own contemporary characteristics. Just like the second film of the protagonist. It is simply impossible to succeed, or it is impossible to release it in 1992. No distribution company or theater chain would dare to do this. 92 Los Angeles riots. It's because of black issues. From April to May, the movie you said is the protagonist will be released in May. Isn't that a joke? Which distribution company would dare to release this kind of movie? It would not be an eyesore for the government. The protagonist is still white. Even if it is for its own benefit, it would not be possible. I would rather die than pay for it.

Do you think clowns can surpass dinosaurs? A 19-year-old movie with a box office of 1 billion does not mean that it can get 1 billion in the 1990s. In addition to inflation, there is also the expansion of the movie market, the increase in ticket prices, and the acceptance of the audience. I don't think it can surpass the dinosaurs. I always feel that this paragraph is too narcissistic.

When I read Chapter 182, I only had the last level of poison resistance left. The author really never thought about the reason for being so aggressive? Do you have to disgust the readers?

Did the author check any information when writing the book? Were there Internet stocks in the early 1990s? There should have been the Internet at that time, but there should have been no Internet companies listed yet, and Microsoft was just a technology stock. Companies that represent the starting point of the Internet should be Netscape, Yahoo, and Amazon. Com.

I don't want to make a good Hong Kong version, but I want to make an American version of Infernal Affairs. I don't know what the author is thinking. It's not as deep as The Matrix, and the interest in reading that was aroused by Batman is now shattered by you. The reason why Time and Space wanted to make an American version of Infernal Affairs is not because the Hong Kong version was too good. To say that the American version of Infernal Affairs is good is because the film companies hired film critics for the sake of box office. I have never seen the American version until now. Just like the Joker, some people in our country went to see it because of the huge popularity caused by Batman 2: The Joker. The same is true abroad, maybe partly because of the social conflicts in Europe and the United States. You ask Warner to try making Joker 2 now. I hope the author doesn't take it too seriously when choosing movies, as this can easily lead to losing a large number of readers.