Global Mist: StarCraft System from the Start

The author has gone too far in reducing the troop types. If the armor of the machine gunner can be easily penetrated, then it would be enough for the human race to just fight the furry dog ​​wave. Why make a Hydralisk Thunder Beast?

I've only read Chapter 20. Let me start by saying that what you wrote is too vicious. . . . . . Hey The following are the shortcomings and poisonous points I see You have to understand the concept of destroying all communications, which is equivalent to destroying the world Let's not talk about the ancient ways of transmitting information, let's talk about modern times. Telegraph (current propagation), wireless communication (electromagnetic wave propagation), wired communication (photoelectric signal propagation) In other words, destroying all communications = destroying the magnetic field, current = destroying the "electromagnetic force" among the four basic forces = destroying the world Even if you say that the equipment circuits are overloaded and all scrapped, it is better than "destroy all communications" The protagonist has been training for 3 months in the doomsday, but he chooses to "exercise" even after recruiting his younger brother? Can't you hide in a safe place and let your younger brother kill you and increase the number of people quickly? Do you have to take this risk? The background is extremely outrageous. The background you set is that there is no army and no government? When will it be the turn of the rich and powerful to speak out in the doomsday situation? Civilians are not allowed to enter... The most critical resource, the population, has been abandoned like this? The most basic national emergency regulations must be in place, right? Without communications, shouldn't the military zone be on alert immediately? There are no three (defense facilities? Ridiculous... . . . . The power armor can fight against the protoss and the Zerg, and it can resist most small weapon attacks. . . . . . . . . . . .

Technological sense

Maybe I am too demanding. I can't stand watching the executioner's ax splitting the SCV in half.

🌹

I came here for StarCraft, but you poisoned me 😭

If the author of this comment sees it, please refer to it. Maybe it can open up new ideas for you! The protagonists of all apocalyptic novels have a golden finger, which is what we readers like, but a protagonist with a golden finger who rises quickly will cause the monsters to mutate and become stronger. What about ordinary people? Because we readers need a sense of involvement, not just being introduced as the protagonist, because it is an apocalyptic novel, so we usually also bring in the perspective of ordinary people to think about it. At this time, we will find that we can't stand it, because it is difficult for the protagonist with a golden finger to survive or face various crises. What about ordinary people? Complete virtualization or various lucky halos? This is not logical! I hope the author will not increase the difficulty because of the gradual rise of the protagonist. Your perspective, author, is God's perspective. While you have to create the lucky protagonist, ordinary people must also take care of it. In this way, the whole book is a real world, a world created by your thoughts, and what we read will be truly interesting! The above is my personal understanding 🙏

As for the interstellar novel, there is nothing wrong with the author's general route, but many friends say that the suppression of human technology is too great. In fact, the author can change the name of the golden finger of SUV to buy sheep's head and dog meat, so that no one will compare the power of the interstellar human race. They have guns and cannons, and they have nothing in their hands, so it seems very inconsistent It is better to write about strong people exploiting weak people and doing things that the protagonist can't stand 2 Develop a points system. The purpose of the protagonist is to give them energy to give them food for 15 days. After giving them, they can't be left idle. After all, there is no threat. Count the crowd, cook, administrative staff, clean, build daily necessities, give full play to it. Giving weapons to others, what does it mean, strength, human rights, but the author, you actually doubt the nature of human greed. The point system is to liberate labor and send out tasks. If you need food, hang it, and hang it for exploration. Even if these people are timid, the protagonist can let the troops sweep them through first, and then save people who want them to save people, and kill monsters if they want to get the benefits. You can see how enthusiastic they will be. Three Whether I read it or not is a matter of one. I felt that what the characters said needed to be tactful. The writing was very fearless. I felt that it needed to be domineering, but the characters were explaining, so it seemed very inconsistent. Apocalyptic novels write female characters, either as vases or in charge of logistics, and are given some special abilities. No writing is true. It will appear very deliberate. Even if the female characters are written by great authors, I think the ambiguous writing is pretty good, well-founded, and has a beginning and an end. However, the author dug a hole and wrote it too slowly and a bit depressingly. As a result, most of the characters the protagonist encountered were female characters with high IQs. Half of the readers felt very irritated and said goodbye. So I didn't write about women if I could.

A savior like you shouldn't have a heroine. A heroine will be poisonous.

I have to regroup my troops! !